• Unraid OS version 6.6.0-rc3 available


    limetech
    • Closed

    Please open a new report for each issue/bug you find unique to this version.

     

    Bug fixes and improvements.

     

    Release notes:

    Version 6.6.0-rc3 2018-09-13

    Base distro:

    • curl: version 7.61.1 (CVE-2018-14618)
    • kernel-firmware: version 20180904_85c5d90
    • libX11: version 1.6.6 (CVE-2018-14598, CVE-2018-14599, CVE-2018-14600)
    • mozilla-firefox: version 62.0 (CVE-2018-12377, CVE-2018-12378, CVE-2018-12379, CVE-2018-16541, CVE-2018-12381, CVE-2018-12382, CVE-2018-12383, CVE-2018-12375, CVE-2018-12376)
    • samba: version 4.8.5
    • talloc: version 2.1.14
    • tdb: version 1.3.16
    • tevent: version 0.9.37
    • ttyd: version 1.4.0 (rev 3) remove auth_token.js reference

    Linux kernel:

    • version 4.18.7
      • md/unraid: version 2.9.4 fix Warning with stack trace when array autostart set to No

    Management:

    • Install Trial key directly and skip email collection step
    • update license.txt and syslinux menus to reflect unRAID OS -> Unraid OS
    • update smartmontools drivedb and hwdata/{pci.ids,usb.ids,oui.txt,manuf.txt}
    • webgui: Added "ignore" text to BTRFS profiles warning
    • webgui: CPU Isolation: Prevent PHP error if no CPUs isolated
    • webgui: Updated parity help text and simplified cron entries
    • webgui: include syslinux folder in flash backup
    • webgui: SMART controller update
      • changed Areca to SAS format
      • added HP cciss
      • fixed global controller selection
    • webgui: Disable PCIe ACS override and VFIO allow unsafe interrupt settings in SAFE mode
    • webgui: CPU pinning: hanlde dots in VM names
    • webgui: VM edit: fixed deletion of vdisks
    • webgui: VM settings: css corrections
    • webgui: Other miscellaneous fixes and updates
    • webgui: Docker: fixed templates not saving
    • webgui: Dashboard: fixed incorrect username references
    • Like 2



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Quote

    update license.txt and syslinux menus to reflect unRAID OS -> Unraid OS

     

    Ooh, so beginning now no more unRAID, it should be Unraid?

     

    It will take some take getting used to that after 10 years the other way, but I guess you won't mind either way for now. 😊

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    27 minutes ago, Frank1940 said:

    Waiting for that promised proper Login page so that a Password Manager can be used...

     

    Promised?

    Link to comment
    7 minutes ago, bonienl said:

    Promised?

    It seems like it was from this post in the thread that request a Proper Login Box that would work with Password Managers...

     

     

    • Upvote 2
    Link to comment

    Update from RC2 to RC3 on Threadripper.

     

    No issues.

     

    A few more updates to possbily sneak in before Unraid 6.6 final?

     

    GCC 8.2 has replaced 8.1 series.

    OpenSSL 1.1.1 (New LTS branch)

    Nano 3.0

    Samba 4.9.0 

    PHP 7.2.10

    OpenSSH 7.8 

     

    I imagine the other applications would be updated in point releases, since this release already has a massive GUI change.

     

    Awesome work again dev team and community for plugins that are already compatible! 

     

     

     

     

    Link to comment
    3 hours ago, Frank1940 said:

    It seems like it was from this post in the thread that request a Proper Login Box that would work with Password Managers...

     

     

    I was really hoping this was coming sooner rather than later, I would like to be able to use a much more complex password, but I'm hesitant to do that without password manager support, especially on mobile.

    Link to comment
    7 minutes ago, mostlydave said:

    I was really hoping this was coming sooner rather than later,

    With respect, this is the wrong place to talk about this.  Trust me, we want to improve authentication asap but it's very important (obviously) to get it exactly right.

     

    Please use this board only to report bugs/issues in the prerelease.

    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment
    Quote
     

    It seems like it was from this post in the thread that request a Proper Login Box that would work with Password Managers...

     

     

    I was really hoping this was coming sooner rather than later, I would like to be able to use a much more complex password, but I'm hesitant to do that without password manager support, especially on mobile.

    To be honest, the basic auth can also be done through a script and/or a browser plugin. Even if you need to copy-paste with LastPass it will still allow you to do this. Respectfully, I agree that pressing for a feature does not belong in a bug report thread.

    Edited by AlexSwensen
    Fixed grammar for clarity.
    Link to comment

    Manual update from RC2 worked without any problems so far. But same issue as before, RC3 didn't showed up in the update section. I only see the status as "unknown". Can't figure it out where my issues are. AWS download servers are reachable within the browser. Nothing gets blocked from my PFsense box. I appreciate any advice.

    Edited by bastl
    Link to comment
    9 minutes ago, bastl said:

    Manual update vom RC2 worked without any problems so far. But same issue as before, RC3 didnn't showed up in the update section. I only see the status as "unknown". Can't figure it out where my issues are. AWS download servers are reachable within the browser. Nothing gets blocked from my PFsense box. I appreciate any advice.

    To verify Internet connectivity a test is done to open "http://www.msftncsi.com/ncsi.txt"

    Check if this test is not blocked on your firewall and the name can resolve.

    Note: this test was introduced in rc1 instead of a 'ping' test, and is the same test Windows 10 performs to check Internet status.

    Edited by bonienl
    • Upvote 1
    Link to comment

    As you said @bonienl it first happened with the RC1 build. The domain "msftncsi.com" i have in an alias list in PFsense since 2017 for blocking Microsofts telemetry stuff. No issues with updating any Windows PC so far in that time by blocking that domain. Windows never showed any connection issues.

     

    I had to remove the domain from the list and also "msftncsi.com.edgesuite.net" for the update check to work. Currently the domains resolve to "a1961.g2.akamai.net" which aren't filtered by my alias list. But i have a couple more "*.akamai.net" domains in there. Let's hope the name resolving doesn't change. Thanks for the hint ;) 

    Link to comment

    I've just joined the 6.6rc family and loving it so far as things feel zippier (except for the docker page) and the cpu pinning page's visual representation has already helped me fix a VM CPU allocation error that must have been there for ages.

     

    I have a question about the CPU Isolation help paragraph:

    Quote

     

    CPU isolation allows the user to specify CPU cores that are to be explicitly reserved for assignment (to VMs or Docker containers).

     

     

    Can I check the VMs or Docker containers section is correct please as I asked this previously and was told that if you isolate CPUs then those CPUs wouldn't be available for dockers.  I'm confident the RC version is correct; I'm just double-checking

     

    If correct, this is brilliant as I can keep non-priority dockers away from VMs and let priority ones like Plex have access to all cores if needed

     

    Link to comment
    6 hours ago, DZMM said:

    Docker containers section is correct please as I asked this previously and was told that if you isolate CPUs then those CPUs wouldn't be available for dockers.

    The GUI will allow you to assign multiple isolated cores to a container.  The theory is that you should know exactly what you are doing should you do this.  

     

    On the CPU pinning page in Settings, its easy to bounce back and forth to see if there is a conflict.  Fix Common Problems however will also look for a conflict between isolated cores and multiple core pinning to docker containers and issue a warning.

    Link to comment
    1 hour ago, Squid said:

    The GUI will allow you to assign multiple isolated cores to a container.  The theory is that you should know exactly what you are doing should you do this.  

     

    On the CPU pinning page in Settings, its easy to bounce back and forth to see if there is a conflict.  Fix Common Problems however will also look for a conflict between isolated cores and multiple core pinning to docker containers and issue a warning.

    Wouldn't it be easier to have the right information in the help details, or to not allow users to try and apply settings that won't work?  We're not talking about making changes via command line where yes, you should know what you are doing before attempting, but via a GUI.

    Link to comment

    This is a very complex subject which will take some thought to determine settings that "won't work".  Also this is beyond the scope of this topic.

    Link to comment


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Status Definitions

     

    Open = Under consideration.

     

    Solved = The issue has been resolved.

     

    Solved version = The issue has been resolved in the indicated release version.

     

    Closed = Feedback or opinion better posted on our forum for discussion. Also for reports we cannot reproduce or need more information. In this case just add a comment and we will review it again.

     

    Retest = Please retest in latest release.


    Priority Definitions

     

    Minor = Something not working correctly.

     

    Urgent = Server crash, data loss, or other showstopper.

     

    Annoyance = Doesn't affect functionality but should be fixed.

     

    Other = Announcement or other non-issue.