Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/22/17 in all areas

  1. Application Name: SWAG - Secure Web Application Gateway Application Site: https://docs.linuxserver.io/general/swag Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/swag Github: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-swag Please post any questions/issues relating to this docker you have in this thread. If you are not using Unraid (and you should be!) then please do not post here, instead head to linuxserver.io to see how to get support. PS. This image was previously named "letsencrypt", however, due to a trademark related issue, it was rebranded SWAG and is being published in new repos. In order to migrate to the new image, all you need to do (at a minimum) is to open the container settings and change the "Repository" field from "linuxserver/letsencrypt" to "linuxserver/swag". If you prefer, you can change the container name to "swag" as well, although it is not required. As long as you keep the environment vars the same and the "/config" folder mount the same, all the settings will be picked up by the new container. Please see here for more detailed instructions: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-swag/blob/master/README.md#migrating-from-the-old-linuxserverletsencrypt-image
    1 point
  2. Application Name: DuckDNS Application Site: https://www.duckdns.org/ Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/duckdns/ Github: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-duckdns/ Please post any questions/issues relating to this docker you have in this thread. If you are not using Unraid (and you should be!) then please do not post here, instead head to linuxserver.io to see how to get support.
    1 point
  3. Application Name: Tautulli Application Site: http://tautulli.com Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/tautulli/ Github: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-tautulli Please post any questions/issues relating to this docker you have in this thread. If you are not using Unraid (and you should be!) then please do not post here, instead head to linuxserver.io to see how to get support. 11/03/2018 - Project renamed from Plexpy to Tautulli To migrate to Tautulli use Community Applications to install Tautulli, using your old Plexpy appdata (ensure you've stopped the existing plexpy container first)
    1 point
  4. Hi Guys, We the developers of Emby have started the development of new container for Emby, right now this is consider testing but it is very stable. Please see the following for more info: https://github.com/MediaBrowser/Wiki/wiki/Docker If you would like to dictate the development of the container please come see us on our forums. Your feedback is much appreciated. http://emby.media/community/index.php?/topic/28661-docker-new-testing-image/ You can also find our official template here: https://github.com/MediaBrowser/Emby.Build/tree/master/unraid-templates/Emby
    1 point
  5. Application Name: Radarr Application Site: https://github.com/Radarr/Radarr Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/radarr/ Github: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-radarr Please post any questions/issues relating to this docker you have in this thread. If you are not using Unraid (and you should be!) then please do not post here, instead head to linuxserver.io to see how to get support.
    1 point
  6. Application Name: NZBGet Application Site: http://nzbget.net/ Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/nzbget/ Github: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-nzbget Permissions Update:- To make downloads more unraid friendly for permissions etc, set the following. go to settings tab in nzbget and this section scroll to bottom, set umask like this. Please post any questions/issues relating to this docker you have in this thread. If you are not using Unraid (and you should be!) then please do not post here, instead head to linuxserver.io to see how to get support.
    1 point
  7. Application Name: MariaDB Application Site: https://mariadb.org/ Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/mariadb/ Github: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-mariadb If you're having issues with the container not starting take a look at this post. Please post any questions/issues relating to this docker you have in this thread. If you are not using Unraid (and you should be!) then please do not post here, instead head to linuxserver.io to see how to get support.
    1 point
  8. Generally, the total power consumption for a given amount of work through the two different processors will be very similar, with the possible unintuitive result of the 7700T actually consuming MORE total system power for a given task. The T version is throttled to keep the maximum consumption below the threshold, for heat sink capacity reasons. If you hand the two otherwise identical systems the same job, the T version will take longer to complete it, thus keeping the rest of the system spun up longer. The faster processor will get the job done sooner, allowing the rest of the components to rest sooner, at the expense of a higher spike in heat as the processor works harder for a shorter period of time. There is NEVER a good reason to choose a T version of a processor if you have sufficient cooling available.
    1 point
  9. Like any computer system it can be more or less "secure". Depends on what you want secured. Note: please only use latest release. Note2: next minor release (6.4) includes https support for accessing server.
    1 point
  10. You can select which NIC is eth0 by changing the MAC assignments, use eth0 to eth3 for the Quad NIC, you'll need to reboot to take effect.
    1 point
  11. Under "normal" circumstances you should have port eth0 up, this is the main port used by unRAID. Try the following: delete the file "network-rules.cfg" in the folder "/config" on your flash device and reboot your server. Expectation is that eth0 is connected.
    1 point
  12. On the settings page of each port you can change the port state between up and down. For those ports currently listed as "not connected" can you change the state to "up" and see if that makes a difference?
    1 point
  13. In active-backup mode only 1 interface will be active, all other interfaces won't carry traffic unless the active interface goes down. You can check if any interface is used by connecting just a single port and move the ethernet cable through all available ports. Communication should be possible on any interface.
    1 point
  14. When you create a bonding interface, you'll need to select which other ports are member of the bond besides eth0. See network settings page.
    1 point
  15. I think you are right on the threshold of maxing out the PCIe lanes, but not quite over. On my motherboard, I wanted to understand the impact of running the GPU in the third PCIe x16 slot, which was wired only for PCIe 2.0 x4 and routed through the x370 chipset. I ran the latest 3DMark Time Spy to test my GTX 670 in both the primary PCIe 3.0 x16 slot, and again in the PCIe 2.0 x4 slot. Surprisingly, the score was almost identical, only a few points lower in the 2.0 x4 slot (2038 in 3.0 x16 vs. 1974 in 2.0 x4). Even more surprising, when I looked in AIDA64, it reported that the GPU in that 2.0 x4 slot was actually connecting at 1.1 x4. Not sure if that info was correct, and if so why it was gen1.1 and not gen2.0 (probably because the bandwidth was being shared with other devices), but it really opened my eyes to how little bandwidth GPU's need on the PCIe bus. I felt a 3% performance reduction was a small penalty to pay to keep my main PCIe slot at full speed for my 24-drive storage controller. Hypothetically, you could put your LSI 9201 and Intel x540-t1 in the primary and secondary PCIe 3.0 slots, and they will both have full speed 3.0 x8, more than each device needs. The two GPU's could then be plugged into the remaining slots, and they would go through the chipset. I know the GTX 1070 is quite a bit faster than my GTX 670, and it might be more sensitive to the reduced bandwidth, but hopefully you would see acceptable results similar to mine. That just leaves the M.2. Ryzen has 24 lanes of PCIe 3.0: 16 lanes for the primary and secondary PCIe x16 slots, 4 lanes for the X370 chipset, and the last 4 lanes for storage. It's up to the motherboard maker to determine what storage it goes to. It could be dedicated to the M.2 slot (so full PCIe 3.0 x4) which is most likely, or it could be used for the many SATA ports, in which case the M.2 could be going through the X370 and sharing the bandwidth. My motherboard actually has two M.2 slots, one CPU direct connect PCIe 3.0 x4, and one routed through the X370 chipset rated at PCIe 2.0 x4, but also sharing it's bandwidth with other devices. The last thing you need to consider is whether or not your motherboard will shut off certain slots/ports when other slots/ports are in use. For example, on my motherboard I have to choose between using the second M.2 port @ 2.0 x4, or the third PCIe x16 slot @ 2.0 x4, it won't let you use both and disables the one not in use. Every motherboard is different, but it is easy to download the manual from the website and see what it says. TL;DR - You're probably okay to run the GPU's in the slower slots. -Paul
    1 point
  16. You don't need to configure sendmail. You can define the smtp server and other options while sending the e-mail in command line Type the following in commandline to see the available options: sendmail -? EDIT: I tested something like this and it works: sendmail -t -v -H 'exec openssl s_client -quiet -tls1 -connect smtp.gmail.com:465' -auMYEMAILADDRESS -apMYPASSWORD <mail.txt mail.txt looks like this: To: [email protected] Subject: Whatever you like Here's the body of the e-mail
    1 point
  17. Dunno if this has affected anyone here, but I guess a big bug is getting fixed in Ryzen via a BIOS upgrade: AMD found the root problem causing its new Ryzen processors to freeze desktops Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/ryzen-amd-bios-fix-fma3-crash/ Last BIOS release for the ASUS Prime X370-PRO was nearly a month ago. I hope the new release brings more fixes/features than just this ... whenever it's ready. - Bill
    1 point
  18. Max speed in a x4 slot with 8 disks is 190MB/s, so enough for most disks. https://forums.lime-technology.com/topic/41340-satasas-controllers-tested-real-world-max-throughput-during-parity-check/#comment-406521
    1 point
  19. PCI-e(xpress) Bus (per lane): v1.x: ~0,250 GByte/s v2.x: ~0,500 GByte/s v3.0: ~0,985 GByte/s v4.0: ~1,969 GByte/s 0,5GB x 4 Lanes : 8 drives = 250 MB/s per drive. This should be enough for a regular spinner drive.
    1 point
  20. I'll start by giving some background on the current wiki method, and then touch on a few things you may not have thought about. I had noticed already several users using unBALANCE, and had been thinking about adding a method based on it, but I won't be able to completely flesh out the steps as I've never used unBALANCE, and can't because I don't use User Shares (which of course partly explains my own methodology). I've always preferred knowing and controlling exactly where everything is, and I've a personal catalog file I keep open in an editor tab with all of my series and categories listed, with the drives they're on. For example, I know that my Alias shows are on Disk 1, and all my PBS stuff is on Disk 4. User Shares are convenient for many, but for me it just adds another layer to the access. Off-topic though ... But converting drives is a drive issue, only indirectly a User Share issue. It's drives that are formatted, and that dominates the problem. I don't know for sure, but I suspect if you wrote out the steps for doing the entire array with unBALANCE, it would be close to 19, or maybe even more. A general method for users at large has to handle every contingency and every situational variation, as safely as possible for the least technical of users. That always takes longer, and often more steps are involved, 'just in case'. It inevitably means lots more words! I do think my method is the most straightforward, safest, and fastest though, but then disk shares is what I work with and understand. It does have an extra step or two to accommodate User Shares. For User Share users, which is most or almost all unRAID users, unBALANCE sounds attractive, and I agree that it's a great plugin! It uses basically the same rsync command, so should have the same speed and file verification checksumming for the individual transfers. But in operation over multiple drives, it's likely to take longer, because it's moving the files off one drive to the others, then moving the files back when you do the next drive, and possibly moving some files multiple times, pushing them around the various drives to keep them out of the way of the next format operation. With my method, files only move once. The only way to make sure no files get moved more than once with unBALANCE is to carefully manage exactly where each file starts and where it ends up, and that sounds like something you wanted to avoid, if you don't want to care where the files are. To me, my method seems just as seamless, and allows full operation just as much. Both ways, you have to stop the array, make changes, then restart the array, just as many times. When I did it with 6.1, I didn't have to use New Config, just adjust the assignments and restart the array. Unfortunately in 6.2, something changed and it won't allow that, so we had to add the New Config step, which I agree does add a little extra hassle. 6.0 and 6.1 users don't have to do that. We have requested that to be corrected, so we can just restart the array, but as far as I know, it hasn't happened yet (haven't checked it recently though). The strong cautions though are just as important, for either method! How do you know for sure that there were not files lost when you did it? Because if there were any other processes (internal plugins, Dockers, scheduled scripts, or VM's, or externally scheduled backups) writing files to the array, they could very well have added files to the very drive you were emptying with unBALANCE. In fact, the emptying of a shared drive makes it the most attractive target for writing new files to. Either you make absolutely sure that nothing else could be writing to the array, or you should run unBALANCE a final time, just to make sure that nothing is left on the drive (written to it after unBALANCE had swept across it), before you format it. Does unBALANCE after moving folders come back and check if they have reappeared on that drive, with more files in them? So I'll add a general unBALANCE-based method, and I think many users may prefer it, as it does hide some of the detail, but it will take longer to perform. And they will have to manually configure unBALANCE for each drive emptying. The steps will have to have just as many warnings. Users who aren't running anything else at all will obviously have a simpler time, can ignore the warnings, but that's a special case. I really don't want any of this to be daunting or nerve-wracking, but each time we hear of a user doing something we hadn't thought of and getting into trouble, the word count increases. The more words, the more daunting it appears ... (just look at this post for instance!)
    1 point
  21. Which GPU is used by unRAID is normally controlled by your BIOS and it depends on what has been set there as the default graphics device to use.
    1 point
  22. In case it still maters the problem is that your Areca controller is using a 4kb logical sector Feb 12 14:55:49 Galactica kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] 1953508992 4096-byte logical blocks: (8.00 TB/7.28 TiB) unRAID currently only supports 512byte sectors, don't know it that setting is configurable on the controller.
    1 point
  23. Ive run DDWRT in the past. I find ASUS-Wrt Merlin firmware to be more stable.
    1 point
  24. EDIT: The application lists previously located within this thread have been moved to Github. Please click https://squidly271.github.io/forumpost0.html Once 6.10.0 is released as a stable version this thread will no longer be updated. Why are you looking at this thread? Save yourself a ton of aggravation and install Community Applications. I'll pay $$ to anyone who has a valid reason to NOT install it If you already are running unRaid, then there is ZERO reason to ever look at this thread. Install Community Applications and be done with it.
    1 point