Leaderboard

v4.0.0 is now available ! 2017-12-05 - 4.0.0 This is major release bringing in new features to improve the end user experience ! Transfer page Here you can monitor the progress of a transfer operation (move/copy), broken down by each rsync command that are taking place History page This is a list of all the operations that have been executed. This allows you to Replay the most recent one (excluding dry-runs) Validate the latest Scatter copy operation (both replay and validate need a confirmation before proceeding) Other features The Scatter and Gather screens are now completely separate, which means you can switch freely among them, without any side effects. A select/deselect all checkbox was added for the TO column in the Scatter screen. The default rsync flags are now fixed, you can only add flags. Improvements / Bug fixes Fix leaving empty folders behind (Gather operation) Fix display of disk location per selection (Gather screen) Fix calculation of space bar Improve throttling of transfer progress updates Avoid running stop script if not present Fix enabling/disabling buttons based on selections Refactor code to better represent the app's concepts (plan, operation, commands, etc.) The size of the bundle was reduced by approximately 70% More details can be found on github. The next steps will be (roughly): - Stop an operation - Fix permissions while planning a transfer (configurable) - Look into Freeman's suggestions a couple of posts above Let me know how it works for you !

@tillkrueger @jenskolson @trurl @unrateable @jonathanm @1812 @Squid since all of you were active in this thread. I found a way to get the file transfer back. Bring up the Guacamole left panel menu (CTRL ALT SHIFT) Input Method = On Screen Keyboard In the On Screen Keyboard, use ALT (it'll stay on, 'pressed') then TAB, select it using TAB, then ALT again (to turn off) A tip I found too, is that anytime doing a copy or move, always best to use the 'queue' button in the pop-up confirmation dialog so that multiple transfers are sequentially handled. It's easy to get to the queue, I found using this it often mitigates much of my need to see the file transfer progress window. The 'Queue Manager' is easy to get back on the screen by using the top menu, Tools > Queue Manager

Thank you! I was facing the same issue

Just posting a NordVPN possible error fix: I am a NordVPN user and this is my first time configuring DelugeVPN in unRaid. I have followed throughly the Newbie VPN Guide (in binhex - General thread) and have reconfigured the docker several times but, when launching the WebUI, I would always get the "Not connected" error. I noticed that the supervisord.log file was ending with the line: [debug] Waiting for valid IP address from tunnel... And it would hang there indefinitely. A couples lines above that, there was this error: Options error: --keepalive conflicts with --ping, --ping-exit, or --ping-restart. If you use --keepalive, you don't need any of the other --ping directives. Use --help for more information. So opening the server .ovpn file turns out that it defines a couple of parameters, amongst them: ping 15 ping-restart 0 I have deleted those two lines from the .ovpn file and after that DelugeVPN worked as supposed to. Hope I can help someone out there.

@gilahacker They just posted a review of 3 Noctua coolers if you feel like a read. http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/review-noctua-nh-u9u12su14s-tr4-sp3-threadripper-coolers.html

If you are in mathematics, see this paper. p+q, raid6.pdf

If you are still running that sempron, the parity check time will approximately double. (I had a dual parity setup on my test bed server -- running a sempron 140 back when dual parity was first introduced.) If my memory is not playing tricks with me, I seem to recall that Intel chips preformed a bit better than AMD. I also seem to recall that a CPU had to have around 2000 passmarks to eliminate the time differential between dual and single parity. Be a bit careful as the passmarks available for each core is a factor as I believe that the parity operation is single threaded.

Troubleshooting

i can update to the latest master commit sure, but i wouldn't guarantee this will fix the omdbapi issue, as CP is not really being developed any more, and the issue (i would guess) is a change of api at the omdb end, and until that change is fixed in CP it will remain broken, i would encourage you all to migrate to Radarr:- p.s this docker image has been marked as deprecated for a while and should be shown as such in CA.

I have actually made a start on a new video for OpenVPN-AS will be up in next couple of weeks, hopefully, end of next week...

IIRC, using CLI doesn't create the user in the local database. Log in with the default admin user and then add the new user in the gui as I described. Once you have verified that that user is working delete the default admin user in the gui and run step 3 from the dockerhub page to be sure the default user doesn't get recreated during updates. Let me know if this works.

I may add support to the Nut Details page (e.g a drop down based on the ups.conf) for monitoring other defined ups but that's about it. You could use the manual mode and add all the info to the conf files. The ups' would have to distinguishable from each other. From the manual: some combination of the "vendor", "product", "serial", "vendorid", and "productid" options. For instance: e.g. [mge]driver = usbhid-upsport = autovendorid = 0463[tripplite]driver = usbhid-upsport = autovendorid = 09ae

Btrfs scrubs the data and will detect checksum failures, but since every data disk is a separate filesystem it won't be able to correct them.

As I'm going through my rather large collection of movies, trying to clean things up and get each movie's folder to reside on a single disk, a lovely new feature for this plug-in came to mind. It would be great if I could select the entire Movies share, then (based on some settings parameters) have it move each movie to the lowest numbered disk that it's currently occupying that also has enough space to hold it. For example, if I have -- 2001 A Space Odyssey occupies space on: disk1, disk3, disk5, disk11 Check each disk in increasing number order to see where there's enough space for all of it, then move it there. If there's enough space on disk1, move all the pieces there, if there's not, check disk3, etc. Configuration options could include disks to exclude from consideration (maybe disk5 is getting pretty old and I don't want anything moved there) disks to include for consideration (I want to move all movies to disks 1-5 and 10-12, but skip 6-9) search disks from lowest number to highest number (or vice-versa) move to the disk that will require the smallest amount of data movement disk1: 100MB, disk3: 5GB, disk5: 950MB - move it to disk3 if there's enough room, otherwise move to disk5 if there's enough room, etc. move to the disk that has the least free space that will hold the files to be moved no matter how many GB have to be moved move to the disk that has the least free space even if all the files have to be moved to get it there. (Disk packing) move to the disk that has the most free space available no matter how many GB have to be moved (optionally even if it's moving all the files). I realize that there's a fair bit of logic involved there, but it seems that all the pieces exist, they just need to be called in a different order, and, potentially, multiple times (make all the checks on a per-directory basis, instead of a per-move basis as it does now). This could work for TV shows, as well. If I select "Seinfeld", then each sub-folder would be processed the same way "2001" was described above. That would put each season on a single disk. If I wanted an entire show on a single disk, I could select the "TV" share and it would attempt to put "Seinfeld" on a single disk somewhere. There would, of course, have to be some logic to handle the case where the directory (Seinfeld), in its entirety, won't fit on any existing disk. That could be skipped, or cause an abort (that could possibly be a configurable option). If it's skipped, I might just clear up enough space moving the rest of the data around that Seinfeld will now fit on a single disk. Yes, I can absolutely do this now, but it takes me manually moving and selecting for each movie or TV show/season. Having an automated process is precisely what computers are for, isn't it? Just a suggestion and an item for the Christmas wish list - it you say it's not doable or you're not interested, no worries - it's your baby, and I'm glad to be able to use it as is.