Leaderboard

THIS PROJECT IS DEPRECATED Due to loss in interest in maintaining Docker container, this project is no longer being worked on and no updates can be expected. ------------------------------------- Welcome to my fourth Docker Container that I've ever created. qbittorrentvpn, a fork of MarkusMcNugen's qBittorrentvpn, but with WireGuard support! Overview: Docker container which runs the latest qBittorrent-nox client while connecting to WireGuard or OpenVPN with iptables killswitch to prevent IP leakage when the tunnel goes down. This project is based of my DyonR/jackettvpn, which is based of MarkusMcNugen's qBittorrentvpn. Base: Debian 10.5-slim Automated Build: Not yet Application: https://github.com/qBittorrent/qBittorrent Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/r/dyonr/qbittorrentvpn/ GitHub: https://github.com/DyonR/docker-qbittorrentvpn Because this project is quite similar to MarkusMcNugen's Project, I asked permission of him beforehand.

Can someone create a Template for tgorg's locast2plex docker? Also, if its possible to add built in open VPN support inside it so we can change the location of the ipAddress. I really would appreciate this! trying to set it up through dockerhub, but I think lots of people will find this container VERY useful!

This maybe of some concern for certain users using specifically tagged docker images:- https://www.theregister.com/2020/08/14/docker_container_retention_policy/

No, all proofs are not equal. The reason I asked for mathematical proof is because it must state all assumptions upfront then use logic to arrive at a set of guaranteed conclusions. To be brutally honest, you statement "proof is proof" and casual use of "Q.E.D." give me the impression that you don't seem to appreciate the rigid standard that the science in computer science has to adhere to. "Some efficient programatic ways" don't automagically materialise from hope-and-pray. Good algorithms are always backed by sound maths and adding "Q.E.D." doesn't make your math sound. Firstly, an assumption you didn't state is that there is only a single error (because your apparatus precisely control for that single variable, which is further apparent when you mentioned we don't need to assume parity is wrong). The implication when trying to recover data with the assumption violated, which you ignored, is further corruption to the array. In other words, the conclusion is NOT guaranteed. Perhaps someone who knows exactly what he/she is doing can use that as a last resort but that should be reserved for specialist data recovery products or even a plugin, not as a main Unraid feature. Unraid has to cater for layman users who for example, despite the big red warning that format is not part of data recovery process and data will be lost, still click format, lose data and ask why. There is also an elephant in the room. Why should LT small team put any effort in implementing this niche feature (among way more highly-requested features) when there is a better, guaranteed solution already implemented? Use btrfs file system, run a scrub and it will tell you exactly which file is corrupted. Not just which disk, which file. I can understand a feature request to do a partial recovery (which with BTRFS would allow file-level data recovery). I don't understand forcing in a feature that MAY fix a rare issue (random data corruption on a single drive) but would confuse and even risk the ability to recover from a relatively less rare issue (a drive failure).

Better performance, lower CPU usage and lower write wear. The last one is pretty major as Johnnie tested and it halved the amount of loop2 write. which was a bug with btrfs multi-drive pool.

But also note that using an earlier version, then upgrading to 6.9.x, while it would still support the old alignment, will require reformatting to take advantage of the new alignment.

Olá Lucas! Washington é uma cidade muito legal, estive ai em 2016 para atender a Speech Tek, uma conferência em reconhecimento de voz. Só conheço eu que usa UnRaid regularmente por aqui. Ajudei um Brasileiro (William se não me engano) no Facebook a instalar o Unraid suportando duas VMs Gamer, para jogar ele e o amigo dele, e também encontrei um Youtuber Brasileiro que fez um video instalando Unraid não sei exatamente para fazer o que - Estilo Linus Tech Tips. Tô achando que os Portugas tem mais instalações de Unraid que os Brazucas.

I figured out what the issue is in libtorrent max_peerlist_size is set to 3000, increasing that solved my issue... for now... 😁

Okay, I'm sorry. Thanks for that fast reply. I dont know how to edit the startscript, that reboot on midnight sounds good, how to do it?

Thank you, @johnnie.black. Removing the referenced files in the scrub seems to have resolved the issue.

Note that if you start with 6.9.x, any newly-formatted SSD by Unraid will not be backward compatible with 6.8.x because of the new 1MiB alignment. So downgrading would require a re-format of the SSD. Keep that in mind if you just want to try things out and want to change your mind later. I run 6.9.0-beta25 at the moment and have no problem to report. But make sure to read the release notes - people tend to ignore them but they contain some very useful info.

You might find this part of the online documentation useful in explaining why you do not get raw disk speeds when writing to the parity protected array and how the ‘turbo’ write mode can speed things up.

NVMe drives can have either a SATA or a PCIe interface. On most most motherboards, including mine, if a SATA NVMe M.2 device is used, a motherboard SATA port is disabled, especially on motherboards such as mine with 8 onboard SATA ports. If a PCIe NVMe device is used, a PCIe slot on the motherboard could be disabled. Whether or not that happens depends on the PCIe lanes used by the device. In my case it is an x4 NVMe SSD so the x4 PCIe slot is disabled. In the case of some motherboards, an x2 PCIe device may disable a couple of x1 PCIe slots (usually only found on ATX motheboards) or a SATA port. It gets very confusing without block diagrams. In my MB manual, the text in the specifications table contradicts what the block diagram says. It turns out the block diagram is correct. Another possibility is that the motherboard has fewer SATA ports than the maximum the chipset can support and that bandwidth is allocated to M.2 device use. It does appear from your motherboard manual that using an x4 PCIe NVMe drive in the M,2_2 slot will disable two of your SATA ports (SATA_56) and that M.2_1 shares bandwidth with SATA_2 if a SATA NVMe device is used. This is why it is important to know if your NVMe device is SATA or PCIe. Your motherboard manual does not have a block diagram which makes all this bandwidth interplay easier to understand. Here is the info provided in your MB manual (which I am sure you have already studied): It looks like you could lose up to 3 of your 6 SATA ports with both M.2 slots occupied if M.2_2 has an x4 PCIe SSD. A block diagram would make it so much easier to interpret as you can see the either/or paths represented graphically. Here's the pertinent portion of my MB block diagram (I have only one M.2 slot):

I had forgotten to change the path to use user instead of mnt. Everything is working now! Thank you for putting up with my newbie questions and helping me out!

As we all know, PIA is currently moving their infrastructure, which results in pretty terribly reliability and constant connection issues when using their CurrentGen Network. Today, however, I discovered that they offer OpenVPN confs for their NextGen servers: https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/pages/download AFAICT they work reliable. Only way to use them currently is to set the STRICT_PORT_FORWARD ENV variable to "no", since their NextGen network doesn't seem to support port forwarding yet.

They have probably changed stuff, but forgot to change it in the wiki. I have not tested it here, just know it from emby.

In windows, make sure you enable the setting for displaying file extensions even if known

Prezado @agarkauskas Saudações de Washington DC. Estou com meu recente instalado UnRAID server aqui. Como esta a comunidade Brasileira nos servidores UnRAID? Cordial abraço, Lucas

hi guys i want to let you know that i got a 1050ti now and it works like charm... i have no clue what exactly was the problem with this 1030, but i will send it back to amazon best regards and thanks again for your help

Your nextcloud subdomain is showing the default landing page, which likely means that your nextcloud proxy conf is not activated properly. Is it named "nextcloud.subdomain.conf" and resides at "/config/nginx/proxy-confs"?

Click on the letsencrypt container and choose command line. Then run the following command: ping nextcloud You are trying https://yourdomain.com right?

Yes, but you can access also the container console itself in portainer or isn't that enough if you run it with my script that installs screen and everything is needed? That is a limitation of Docker itself, some containers need the physical path where the files are (eg Don't Starve, L4D2,...) and some not and that's not a limitation of my containers that's a limitation of the application itself that runs in the container. There are also other containers out there that act as in your case L4D2 but that has with the application itself to do and not the container. Like I've said above you can run the containers from other directorys too but you have to link tho the path where the gamefiles are (/mnt/user is not the physical path this is just 'virtual' path that combines all directorys so that they are in the right spot if you open up a share). For example: If you make a new share, let's say 'gameservers' that is forbidden to use the cache and is exclusively on the array the 'virtual' path is /mnt/user/gameserver/... but the real path would be (let's say unraid created this folder on disk3) /mnt/disk3/gameserver/... The same goes for your appdata directory if it's on the array it would be (also let's say it's on disk3) /mnt/disk3/appdata/... even if it's available through /mnt/user/appdata/ (Please also note that if the files are spread over multiple disks this doesn't work) I also have some games on my appdata (which is set to use the cache only) where the path would be /mnt/cache/appdata/... and also got games that are on a Unassigned Drives share where the path is /mnt/disks/DISKNAME/... and even got one game that I've set to be on the array in the folder 'gameserver' (and I also set to use only disk6 in my case) where the path is /mnt/disk6/gameserver/... Hope this makes things clearer.

Also works if not on the cache drive but you must specify the disk where thegamefiles are, don't use '/mnt/user/appdata/...' For example if the gamefileare on disk3 then you must enter: '/mnt/disk3/appdata/...' if you don't have it in the appdata folder then for example: '/mnt/disk3/l4d2' then it would also work. Log in over ssl? I think you mean ssh? Please look at the post above, I've attached a script that you can use to install screen and it will also work for other containers. Some of my containers have screen installed by default since it's needed, like minecraft bedrock (to op a user). You also can connect via ssh to a unraid or host machine console and connect to the screen session inside the container.

Zfs actively being worked on for unraid [emoji1635] https://selfhosted.show/25 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SMART for parity looks OK. To rebuild to same disk: Stop array Unassign disabled disk Start array with disabled disk unassigned Stop array Reassign disabled disk Start array to begin rebuild