pish180

Thanks that was very helpful mod and if it was also you with the quick license change thanks for that as well! Almost everything was recovered since I had the cache drives with all the appdata stored there and I was able to identify which drives were the parity drives. I also solved another issue that I was having with Radarr and got confirmed the backups are running with Unraid Connect. The Unraid Connect backup feature is really nice! Great feature! Highly recommend getting that setup ASAP! I do wish you could move you license manually but it was a pretty quick turn around after I posted here and sent in the email. Thanks! One thing to note for anyone who searches in the future. You can "pause" the parity rebuild but you can't "stop" the array and think it will pickup where it left off. I did this while reconfiguring Unraid and it had to start all over again. Just let it rebuild. It would be nice if the rebuild had a state file when it is restarted to continue where it left off. Overall off one of the easiest systems to recover from and I've had many RAIDs and severs go bad on me in the past. Good stuff!

Yup this sucks. I swear I had setup backups to the Unraid connect but it doesn't seem to be there. So I need to get my license transferred to my new GUID USB drive. I sent support an email already. I do not know which drives went where. I had 2 parity, 8 data drives, 2 cache drives (1 was no present, being replaced at the time of failure), 1 unassigned drive. How am I am able to figure out assignments? Can I mount the drives via console and see what is on them? I think I read the parity drives won't mount or something. Not sure. Any help would be appreciated.

I have a similar question on this topic. I am running Dual Parity with 10TB drives and all my data drives are 10TB. One of my data drives needs to be replaced but I only have 2 x 16 TB drives for replacement. Do I have to replace BOTH parity drives before I can start upgrading the capacity of the data drives to 16TB drives? OR can I upgrade 1 parity drives with the 16TB drive and then upgrade the failing data drive with the other 16TB drive? What would be the recommended procedure in my case?

Amazing job! App works amazing and is so much better to use than the ones in Sonarr and Radarr!

If anyone is having this issue I think I resolved it. Not very hard but did require time and tinkering. You will need to open a console to the UnRaid server and everything will be done under /mnt/user/appdata/ First try and get Sab to boot so you can get to the config settings menu screen. I had to chmod 655 the sabnzbd.ini file. Do this from the console (mentioned above). This file will be sabnzbd/sabnzbd.ini Restart the container once you do this from the Unraid UI. Go to the settings menu within Sab and backup your Sab settings. It's at the bottom and says "download backup". You should now have a sabnzbd-config.zip file on your local computer. Stop the Sab container From the console mv the sabnzbd folder to sabnzbd2 (just so you have the orig) (basically just renaming it). Start Sab container (This is going to cause the container to rebuild the files). If you had https it likely won't work so navigate to your http port. Mine was 8080. You should see a Sab setup wizard screen with an option at the bottom to import a config. Import the config. Save settings, Restart Docker. Test to ensure everything works. (Mine changed internal docker IP so I had to update Radarr, Sonarr, Lidarr, etc). Once I did this no more errors in my Sab docker logs. I noticed that after docker rebuild everything that nothing is root anymore in the sab folders. Confirmed this with an ls -al in both sabnzbd (after this process) and compared it to sabnzbd2 (folder that I backedup). Everything is set to nobody users. I'd image another fix would be to just reset all the perms from root root to nobody users may fix the issue. However I think having it fix it all was a better option. Hopefully this helps someone.

Messing with it a bit. I had to set the sabnzbd.ini to 655 to get it working. I was watching the log and there were other permissions issues. I had to change the admin/rss_data.sab to 666 Then it complained about can't Write to "History database" Which is (also at the default) set to 644. I'm guessing there is going to be more with the current trend. I recently upgraded both the SAB container and Unraid to 6.10.2 from 6.9.2 so I'm not sure what update broke it/updated perms. Anyone else having this issue?

After upgrading to Unraid 6.10 I am getting permissions errors on the docker config file. If I need to change this, what should it be set to? Perms on config. I assume it means this config file (/mnt/user/appdata/sabnzbd/sabnzbd.ini)

Prefect that worked! Had to restart FF after I applied the changes though.

Weird. I got some new monitors... the problem is gone. I'm guessing it more windows display setting issue than the actual monitors but still very weird. Anyways, looking forward to the 6.10 and hope the problem doesn't come back. As an FYI - Old Monitors were MSI MPG27CQ and the new ones are Samsung Odyssey G7s

Outstanding thanks. I'm on Unraid 6.9.2, any ideas on when 6.10 is going GA?

Bump, This is still an issue for Chrome on a Windows machine. This is the most widely used Web Browser out, really need to resolve this, thanks! Confirmed still broken with Chrome 95.0.4638

Any idea if you can use the configurator on a Dell PowerEdge R730XD? I have the 10G NIC installed and the fans go absolutely ballistic. I've ran the manual ipmitools command which drops them down to 9,500 RPM (ish) which is still VERY loud. I was rather hoping that I could use this tool to set the speeds lower to say like 7-8k RPM. I always Get this message when I go to Fan Control Tab. It tells me to click on configure button but there is no configure button. Any ideas?

Any of the devs consider looking at this? Maybe something like Anchore, Clair, etc or another docker file that we can add to Unraid that would scan all the docker images we have in our Local Docker Repo and provide a report for UnRaid users? I think this would be really valuable for the community so they know of the images they are running, if there are any vulnerability and let them determine if its an acceptable risk. Thanks!

Maybe a second look for an interested container expert to get this working for the community? Please.

Wish I knew but there was something going on with the Windows host to the UnRaid host. I had tried swapping cards, cables, ports, etc. I also tried putting the 10G card in a FreeNas (BSD) box (completely separate 2u Dell server) and then ran Iperf3 on there and it worked fine. I tried driver settings and networking config settings (MTU, etc) and nothing worked. It had all the same networking hardware that was just in the Windows machine. I didn't have the time or hardware to install Windows on the Dell server to try it out there. If you have some time and the hardware it would be a good test to see if its a single Windows system or if its just something between Windows and Linux that is causing the slowdown. I know for a fact that I did a Windows to FreeNas with 10G and it saturated the 10G connection. I was looking for screenshots because I swear I took one (but I can't find it). FreeNas was in Raid-Z2 with 8 drives and the Windows was Hardware Raid6 with 10 drives. And at that time I had moved stuff from Windows to FreeNas at blistering speeds. I found it really odd that I had different speeds in different directions between Unraid and Windows. No other systems exhibited this behavior. I really put the 10G card in the Unraid box for 2 reasons. 1. The main reason... So I could transfer files from my old Windows server to my new Unraid box faster. 10g Windows host to 10g UnRaid host (Raid 6 on WIndows could easily saturate 10G). TBH... unless you are reading/writing it to an SSD or an Array setup you will max out the speed of the single drive. 3.2Gbps is much faster than sustained speed of the mechanical drive). 2. The lesser reason... So I can serve multiple clients at the same time and the network won't be the issue. Theoretically I have a 1Gbps unlink + internal Plex offerings. I could saturate that link and several home players before networking is an issue. That being said 3.2Gbps is still probably way more than you could ever saturate unless you have a > 1Gbps internet uplink. I'm not super satisfied with the outcome of this either but I just set the transfers to go and waited for them to be done with slow speed. I also ran into another issue with share settings and caching. Feel free to look up that thread I created. I did a lot of research there as well, essentially the sustained speed of the transfer would drop to double digits if you used most free with parity. Guessing it doesn't listen to the Parity write flag when it changes drives. I'm guessing but I think it started writing parity and slowing down everything. Long story but I figured out a work around in that thread for that problem.

Did anyone figure out the umask setting or how to get Qbit to write files with different permissions so that someone other than nobody/users can access the files? Currently all files are written with 755. I would also be even more happy if I could change the user from nobody to a set user that I already have set. The one post I read claims that the following works: set -e UMASK_SET=000 It however breaks the image and makes you have to redeploy the container using the "Add Container" at the bottom and choosing the template and then removing the extra line (that you just added). -- FYI for those who had the issue. Not sure if someone here is a bit more advanced with this container and/or permissions but it would be very much appreciated if you could provide some insight to this issue. Thanks!

Not on the Win10 machine. I blew it away after I built up Unraid and moved to containers. The Win 10 machine was running so much software it would have been really hard to find out what was causing it. I tried the obvious things like drivers, AV, etc. Gl.

Is anyone able to get this to work on the UDM Pro? I posted a community post in the Ubiquiti forums about this as well and contacted their support which deferred me to the Unifi forums. https://community.ui.com/questions/DNS-Rebinding-and-UDM-Pro-Unifi-Dream-Machine-Pro-Plex/6fcc3157-0352-4f1e-a582-a1810c437ab0

DOH. Are one of the mods able to move it? I swear I recall trying to and there was no button to create a thread. I guess as you mentioned I was probably in a sub-forum. Ideally I would like it in the FR section. If not I guess I can re-create it there.

That's a good point. I would have put this post in the request section but that is blocked off. The goal with this post is really 3 things: 1. Hopefully build some interest amongst the community 2. Once we have some interest, see if any devs want to take on the challenge. 3. End Product? Wanting to volunteer someone else's time. - Seems like a negative way to word it. If that is what you consider a request to build something is then I guess I'm guilty. 🙄 Every project starts with an idea/request/issue. With more users backing a request a dev would feel. 1. More motivated 2. More likely to be incentivised 3. Have a positive impact on the community Depending on what motivates them. FTR I have supported many developers via Patron and other donations for their work. Just wanted to throw that out there. Hope that helps.

Comment: Honestly surprised this has not receive more attention in here... Considering Unraid primary function is to house all your data as a NAS and I'd image many people store sensitive or personal data/documents on their servers... right? Combine that with running applications (docker images) that share the same kernel and mounted filesystems that someone else (other than the programers) are building (the docker images)... nobody is concerns? If if you trust the image owners, after they are deployed nobody has concerns about them containing exploits or knowing if they are vulnerable? I'm not sure if everyone is naive or just doesn't care about their data on their Unraid server or their home network in general. Can anyone who doesn't maintain the docker images tell me if you have CVE-2019-5021 on your Alpine linux running containers? I'd guess nobody can confidently answer that without spending significant researching it or already have tools scanning. Supporting Info: This is a decent writeup back in 2017. https://sysdig.com/blog/7-docker-security-vulnerabilities/ Also this in 2019 (has video) https://www.techrepublic.com/article/docker-containers-are-filled-with-vulnerabilities-heres-how-the-top-1000-fared/ Summary: My point is that many of these containers are communicating with the internet. 1. We don't know what is in the images we are downloading/updating. (unless you are one of those people that hash matches all the binaries and configs to the master). 2. Your containers will or do have vulnerabilities and you will have no idea about it. If you are running a container that the image maintainer stopped updating (maybe they are on vacation) and an exploit is discovered, well good luck. Considering the current state of the world with CoVid19... you will see an increase of ransomware! It won't matter who you are... people need money and take advantage in times like these. I can personally attest to this: I have a unifi firewall and it is running IDS and the amount of attacks against my IP has increased. https://www.businessinsider.com/ransomware-attack-hospitals-coronavirus-covid-19-2020-3 Want/Ask/Need: I would really like to see some integrations of tools that scan against the images and running containers. There are a lot of smart people in here and I'm sure everyone can benefit from having a container that does scanning of other containers. Wouldn't it be nice to know you have a problem with a docker (a CVE was released yesterday) and this image is vulnerable. That could allow you to at least disable the services until it is updated or follow the CVE and perhaps mitigate the risk another way. Disclaimer: I am not a dev. I want to generate interest from the community and see if any devs would be interested in this project. As GI Joe says.... Knowing is half the battle.

Another note there is a really neat feature that I found yesterday within Sonarr, Radarr and Lidarr. The movies and exisodes that don't get automatically picked up after it kicks off the downloads (which can happen for many reasons, generally naming) they can be imported and moved automatically. At the top go to "Wanted" and then there is a button that says manually import. This is different than mass import. This will give you the option to move the files, this is SUPER Helpful for getting those stubborn ones over without the manual rename or folder creation done. Hope that helps.

I use Sonarr and it works just fine. Did you enable the option to move the files via the advanced settings? Also this question would probably be better in the Sonarr channel. You can find the support link by searching in here or clicking the question mark on the container within your unraid server.

It would be nice to see some security tools around the docker. For example maybe something that can do vulnerability scanning and reporting of your running containers. It would be helpful for many reasons, perhaps adding additional firewall rules to prevent attacks, upgrading, downgrading etc. I know there are open source tools and images that already exist with many features that we could all benefit from.