shwa87

Members
  • Posts

    42
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

shwa87's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

2

Reputation

  1. @falconexe Yes Please! Happy to test it prior to full release if needed as well. Thank you, sir!
  2. If this is the case, why does Samba/winbind lag/hang even when the array is NOT slated to start on boot if there's an unclean shutdown or if I set it not to start on boot for whatever reason?
  3. Why does samba need to be up and running in order for vms to start? There are no shares being passed to the VMs nor are shares mapped. The VMs live on an SSD pool and the domains and system 'shares' are not SMB shares...
  4. I think I have a possible solution... add this to a user script that runs when the array is shutdown: sed -i 's/shareSMBEnabled="ads"/shareSMBEnabled=“no”/g’ /boot/config/share.cfg But I don't think I can do it in reverse because the config file would only be read at startup. So essentially, I'd need a set of commands that would enable SMB AD as the array is started. This seems like it could be possible, since I can join AD via CLI without stopping the array even though if its done in the GUI it forces services to stop and start (and thus fails since the domain controller runs in a VM) Are there commands that can achieve this?
  5. I want to stop getting bootup delays due to winbindd hanging because it keeps trying to connect because my domain controller runs in an unRAID VM. So I'd like to effectively keep Samba out of the picture until the array is started so any delays aren't as a big deal. Alternatively, even being able to have winbindd stop trying after X number of failures (i.e. say 2 failures) during bootup. Thanks!
  6. Hello - is there a way to delay the startup of samba until the array is fully started and/or start it manually or via a script after the array is fully started via user scripts? Could I theoretically use a user script to disable smb on array shutdown and then a user script to enable it at startup or sometime after startup? Thanks!
  7. I agree, I posted a request in the lsio forum (https://discourse.linuxserver.io/t/un-deprecate-nzbget-or-start-a-new-one) but it doesn't look good, at least until Paul can get ramped up on development.
  8. Greetings, I'm trying to run the drive benchmark and I'm getting the following errors: Message variable [ISSSD] doesn't exist Stacktrace The Error Occurred in /var/www/Benchmark.cfm: line 482 480: </CFIF> 481: </CFIF> 482: <CFIF IsSSD> 483: <CFIF HW[Key].Ports[PortNo].Attrib.Size.Bytes GT SSDMaxBytes> 484: <CFSET SSDMaxBytes=HW[Key].Ports[PortNo].Attrib.Size.Bytes> Java Stacktrace lucee.runtime.exp.ExpressionException: variable [ISSSD] doesn't exist at lucee.runtime.type.scope.UndefinedImpl.get(UndefinedImpl.java:242) at lucee.runtime.type.scope.UndefinedImpl.get(UndefinedImpl.java:184) at benchmark_cfm$cf.call(/Benchmark.cfm:482) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl._doInclude(PageContextImpl.java:1056) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl._doInclude(PageContextImpl.java:948) at lucee.runtime.listener.ClassicAppListener._onRequest(ClassicAppListener.java:65) at lucee.runtime.listener.MixedAppListener.onRequest(MixedAppListener.java:45) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl.execute(PageContextImpl.java:2493) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl._execute(PageContextImpl.java:2478) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl.executeCFML(PageContextImpl.java:2449) at lucee.runtime.engine.Request.exe(Request.java:45) at lucee.runtime.engine.CFMLEngineImpl._service(CFMLEngineImpl.java:1216) at lucee.runtime.engine.CFMLEngineImpl.serviceCFML(CFMLEngineImpl.java:1162) at lucee.loader.engine.CFMLEngineWrapper.serviceCFML(CFMLEngineWrapper.java:97) at lucee.loader.servlet.CFMLServlet.service(CFMLServlet.java:51) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:764) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:227) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:162) at org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFilter.doFilter(WsFilter.java:53) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:189) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:162) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:197) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:97) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:541) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:135) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:92) at org.apache.catalina.valves.AbstractAccessLogValve.invoke(AbstractAccessLogValve.java:687) at org.apache.catalina.valves.RemoteIpValve.invoke(RemoteIpValve.java:769) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:78) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:360) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:399) at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:65) at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:890) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1789) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1191) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:659) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61) at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829) Timestamp 12/12/22 12:40:32 PM CST Any and all assistance is appreciated.
  9. My parity operations have always been on the lower end, but from what I remember were at least double what I'm getting now, if not more. Yes I had dual parity before, and MORE total disks than I have now. The disk speed docker spits out code errors when I try to benchmark my drives: Message variable [ISSSD] doesn't exist Stacktrace The Error Occurred in /var/www/Benchmark.cfm: line 482 480: </CFIF> 481: </CFIF> 482: <CFIF IsSSD> 483: <CFIF HW[Key].Ports[PortNo].Attrib.Size.Bytes GT SSDMaxBytes> 484: <CFSET SSDMaxBytes=HW[Key].Ports[PortNo].Attrib.Size.Bytes> Java Stacktrace lucee.runtime.exp.ExpressionException: variable [ISSSD] doesn't exist at lucee.runtime.type.scope.UndefinedImpl.get(UndefinedImpl.java:242) at lucee.runtime.type.scope.UndefinedImpl.get(UndefinedImpl.java:184) at benchmark_cfm$cf.call(/Benchmark.cfm:482) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl._doInclude(PageContextImpl.java:1056) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl._doInclude(PageContextImpl.java:948) at lucee.runtime.listener.ClassicAppListener._onRequest(ClassicAppListener.java:65) at lucee.runtime.listener.MixedAppListener.onRequest(MixedAppListener.java:45) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl.execute(PageContextImpl.java:2493) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl._execute(PageContextImpl.java:2478) at lucee.runtime.PageContextImpl.executeCFML(PageContextImpl.java:2449) at lucee.runtime.engine.Request.exe(Request.java:45) at lucee.runtime.engine.CFMLEngineImpl._service(CFMLEngineImpl.java:1216) at lucee.runtime.engine.CFMLEngineImpl.serviceCFML(CFMLEngineImpl.java:1162) at lucee.loader.engine.CFMLEngineWrapper.serviceCFML(CFMLEngineWrapper.java:97) at lucee.loader.servlet.CFMLServlet.service(CFMLServlet.java:51) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:764) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:227) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:162) at org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFilter.doFilter(WsFilter.java:53) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:189) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:162) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:197) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:97) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:541) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:135) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:92) at org.apache.catalina.valves.AbstractAccessLogValve.invoke(AbstractAccessLogValve.java:687) at org.apache.catalina.valves.RemoteIpValve.invoke(RemoteIpValve.java:769) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:78) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:360) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:399) at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessorLight.process(AbstractProcessorLight.java:65) at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$ConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:890) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1789) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.SocketProcessorBase.run(SocketProcessorBase.java:49) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1191) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:659) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61) at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829) Timestamp 12/12/22 12:40:32 PM CST
  10. Here's another try after rebooting, sync is started - vms are not. some dockers are, but none that are heavy data access that I can see. catan-diagnostics-20221212-1156.zip
  11. Attached. Thank you! catan-diagnostics-20221212-1025.zip
  12. Thanks for pointing that out - I'm not sure how that happened. system is now ONLY cache, appdata is ONLY cache, and domains is prefer cache. All data matches that now (after moving the system share to only be on cache) Speeds are also the same, averaging around 18-20. No disk is more or less than the other, and when I stop the sync (to restart it after fixing my shares per trurl's post) it drops to 0 on all disks, upon starting the sync again, the speeds average the same.
  13. Something more than the parity sync reads? The read counts all look around the same for the array drives in the GUI.
  14. I replaced 15 1TB drives with 5 new-ish larger capacity drives (all precleared successfully) and the parity sync is going at most 20 MBps., but averaging 16 or so. I've attached diags, I don't see anything glaringly obvious but was hoping someone else might. Thanks! catan-diagnostics-20221211-2336.zip