HannesDi
-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Posts posted by HannesDi
-
-
Hallo,
ich such jetzt schon seit 2 Tagen eine lösung für mein Problem, dass ich manche Container aus innerhalb Unraid nicht erreichen kann.
Ich hab mir einen Reverse Proxy wie von SpaceinvaderOne mit den Videos:
How to Use DNS Verification with your Reverse Proxy & use a Wildcard SSL Certificate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AS0HydTEuA4
How to Setup and Configure a Reverse Proxy on unRAID with LetsEncrypt & NGINX: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0lhZc25Sro&t=608sgebaut aber bin direkt auf den SWAG Container....
Das funktioniert eigentlich auch soweit...
Dann kam noch:
Securely Access any PC or VM Remotely using only a Web Browser with Guacamole: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTFB2XEQQUU
dazu und die Sache mit den eigenen IP Adressen für Docker Container mittels der "BR0"
und damit ging gefühlt ein problem los...Mein Netzwerk läuft auf 192.168.222.x
z.B. Unraid: 192.168.222.10
z.B. Guacamole: 192.168.222.123
des weiteren noch verschiedene andere Docker Container und VMs auch in dem IP Range: 192.168.222.xyzz.B. meine Gaming-VM: 192.168.222.100
-> SSH auf Unraid und in der Konsole ping auf:
unraid -> 192.168.222.120 geht
unraid -> 192.168.222.121 geht
unraid -> 192.168.222.122 geht nicht-> Konsole in der VM ping auf:
GamingPC VM -> 192.168.222.120 geht
GamingPC VM -> 192.168.222.121 geht
GamingPC VM -> 192.168.222.122 gehtVon den VM´s aus kann ich alle IP-Adressen im Range: 192.168.222.xyz anpingen
Aber unter Unraid (zum gleichen Zeitpunkt) nicht.
Kann mir jemand sagen wo ich drehen muss dass unraid auch die 192.168.222.122 anpingen kann und mir nicht sagt "unreachable" ?
GrüßeHannes
-
Before i try and fail....
Anyone has tested 5.10.0rc4-thor-Unraid+.NV.6.9b30 also works with v6.9.0 beta35 ?
Best Regards
Hannes -
On 9/29/2020 at 5:47 PM, thor2002ro said:
5.9.0RC7-20200929 release
Thank you very much.
One Question is it possible to make it compatible to Version: 6.9.0-beta29 ?
Different Version of MD so the Array would not Start :-(
Best Regards
Hannes -
On 3/8/2020 at 8:38 PM, Decto said:
The problem with the AM4 platform is a lack of PCI-E lanes to support what you want. .......
Thank you for this very detailed Information, i dont have fully understood this for weeks. but after weeks of checking testing reading and crying... i makes really sense now. i have shrinked my 'project vision' down to 1 GPU and upgraded the processor to a Ryzen 7 3700X but made a big mistake i bought a X470 Taichi ... nice mainboard but big mistake for me.
I run into huge problems... Running the RTX 2060 Super along with LSI Controller works fine and passthrough works fine. But then i would also passthrough one of the onboard USB controllers. Everytime it ends in a Server crash. So i bought a separate usb card and run into other problems. I think this problems is the "lack of PCI-E lanes" i have changed every possible position of slots but allways end up the same IOMMU group and this group looks like is not splitable and i cant isolate this card.
So today i have ordered a another board.. a Gigabyte X570 Aorus Pro as used in other threads here and send the Taichi back.Thank you Again
Hannes -
Hello,
now that I have seen some videos of Spaceinvader One and read a lot on the pages here...The question is which board and processor should I buy to reach my goals?
Since the financial means are limited, the desired processor is already almost certain. It should be a: Ryzen 7 2700.
2 or 3 graphics cards are Avail and could / should be used, in conjunction with 3 VM's but only a maximum of two of them will run the same Time.
1. an NVIDIA RTX 2060 Super
should be used for the Gaming PC VM.2. a Radeon R9 280x
for a MacOS Catalina VM.3. an Nvidia GT630 1GB
for an Allways ON - Windows 10 machine for surfing the net and similar
alternatively a Linux desktop instead of Windows 10.The Mainboard should have as many SATA connectors as possible to complement or eliminate the currently used LSI controller.
Does anyone have a suggestion or experience with which board this is possible?
Thanks a lot
Greetings Hannes -
Thank you for all the Help , i started made my solution on base of testdasi´s script and now i prepare my borg backup scripts to write on them
-
6 hours ago, testdasi said:
+ a bash script to install mergerfs and run commands.
It's quite straight-forward actually. That's how I utilised by external USB SSD's for offline backup.
would and could you share your script with me? that would be really nice
-
8 minutes ago, testdasi said:
why don't you just add all of them to the array?
The Answer is Simple:
1. having the two hard disk sets for "main data" and the "backup data" in the same enclosure is not a backup for me.
In case of fire or water damage, burglary or vandalism all data is lost.
I want a real Backup because after the backup is finished, the hard drives will be detached and taken out of the office.
-
Hello,
after setting up my complete system with 6 hard disks + ssd, and installed all stuff the question: "how to backup ALL data?" comes up.
I have 4 hard disks (2x 8tb + 2x 3tb) in a separate housing that can be connected via usb3 or sata.
All of these are recognized as single hard disks and appears in the area of unassigned devices and of course i can mount them manually so that they are available
as single backup storage targets.But i want them as "one big" storage target with 22 tb. call it 1 big logical volume...
Any Idea how this could be managed? Is UNRAID cappable to do this?
Sure from nerdpack i could install unionfs and try this.. but is there not a easy way i could not see ?
Or is it needed to install a Linux VM and setup there a lvm?
Best Regards
Hannes
Docker containers using br0 can't access the UnRAID IP address
in General Support
Posted
i´ll hope you got a answer this because it would also solve my issue...
but when you find the solution yourself, it would be nice when you post it here