Alexandro

Members
  • Posts

    321
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Alexandro

  1. Dear RobJ,

    Thank you very much for your exhaustive comment.

    The controller is a Supermicro SASLP-MV8 with LSI cables connected to a Supermicro M35-T cage.

    Will upgrade to RC3 as soon as I get back home with a hope to resolve the annoying issue.

    Smart (long and short) tests were perform showing no problems with the disk.

    Will keep an eye on it and will report what is happening once I upgrade to RC3.

     

    Thanks again.

  2. Does it mean it is a bug in beta 15?

    Haven't noticed such a behavior of beta 14.

     

    Edited:

    The problem gets deeper. Now I am unable to use the cache drive as it gets read only almost immediately after a restart and BTRFS-scrub tools are unable to start.

    ERROR: scrubbing /var/lib/docker failed for device id 1 (Read-only file system)

    scrub canceled for d2d1ad6d-a902-4299-a60c-d4f6a31397ce

    scrub started at Thu May 14 09:14:51 2015 and was aborted after 0 seconds

    total bytes scrubbed: 0.00B with 0 errors

     

    Edited:

    Restarted again the whole server and went directly to docker settings. Ran scrub, and here is the output:

    ERROR: There are uncorrectable errors.

    scrub device /dev/loop0 (id 1) done

    scrub started at Thu May 14 09:27:07 2015 and finished after 1 seconds

    data_extents_scrubbed: 241775

    tree_extents_scrubbed: 25372

    data_bytes_scrubbed: 3474448384

    tree_bytes_scrubbed: 415694848

    read_errors: 0

    csum_errors: 2

    verify_errors: 0

    no_csum: 320

    csum_discards: 267533

    super_errors: 0

    malloc_errors: 0

    uncorrectable_errors: 2

    unverified_errors: 0

    corrected_errors: 0

    last_physical: 6480199680

     

  3. Just restarted again and I have a different message in my syslog (attached) this time.

     

    May 14 01:56:59 UNRAID kernel: BTRFS info (device loop0): csum failed ino 40191112 off 13086720 csum 4075985030 expected csum 3722458094

    May 14 01:56:59 UNRAID kernel: BTRFS info (device loop0): csum failed ino 40191112 off 13086720 csum 4075985030 expected csum 3722458094

    May 14 01:56:59 UNRAID kernel: BTRFS info (device loop0): csum failed ino 31910 off 922968064 csum 2992561721 expected csum 3393297930

    May 14 01:56:59 UNRAID kernel: BTRFS info (device loop0): csum failed ino 31910 off 922968064 csum 2992561721 expected csum 3393297930

    syslog.zip

  4. Unraid 6 beta 15 here.

    Suddenly my all my dockers became offline.

    This is the second time it happens for the last 3 days. A restart of the array solves it.

    Here is what I had in my log.

     

    May 14 00:33:13 UNRAID kernel: BTRFS (device loop0): parent transid verify failed on 1008828416 wanted 178026 found 176354

    May 14 00:33:13 UNRAID kernel: BTRFS (device loop0): parent transid verify failed on 1008828416 wanted 178026 found 176354

     

    The above message was generated million times. What does it mean?

    The cache disk where the docker.img resides is RFS formatted.

    A smart test was performed showing no issues.

     

    Searched the board and couldn't managed to find similar complain from other users. 

     

     

  5. Could you please enlighten me what is the benefit of running kodi headless on a server?

    Is it only for handling the database or it has other advantages?

    In case it is only for database sharing how it is better than MySQL sharing?

    Thank you in advance for your work and answers.

  6. Hi guys,

    Needed to replace a Supermicro SASLP-MV8 with a DELL Perc H310 controller.

    When I started the array disk 2 came with a redball and consequently the Unraid disabled it.

    I have opened the case and discovered that the SFF8087 wasn't fitted well into the controller - causing a bad connection to the disabled Disk2.

    I need someone to confirm the steps I took in order to resolve the situation.

    1. I have stopped the array.

    2. Unassigned disk2 and started the array.

    3. Stopped the array and assigned the drive again.

    4. Started the array.

    5. The rebuild have started.

     

    Is there something stupid I have done?

     

  7. Tested this on an Ivy Bridge system (non-Xeon) that we have here and scaling works fine.  Not sure what differences exist between an i5 ivy bridge and xeon ivy bridge that would cause the the scaling issue to occur on one and not the other, but that is the case.

     

    Hi jonp,

    Please find a screenshot for Xeon E3 1220 V2

    Just to clarify that this "bug" is not making me nervous at all.

    By the way noticed it a week ago...

     

    Screen_Shot_2015-04-15_at_7_15.55_PM.png.985fec69e329a819de7020600b8ba70f.png