GuilhermeFluis

Members
  • Posts

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GuilhermeFluis

  1. Somebody here was able to use this container with Linuxserver.io Nextcloud? I tried the environment variables on the Nextcloud container but it basically ignored, I tried editing the config.php file but this made the container not start... If someone could help me I would be very glad
  2. [DESIRE TO KNOW MORE INTENSIFIES] ok, I understand that KB and mouse are dealt by RDP, no need to USB over IP them. Could I RDP into a computer using a Rpi, plug something on the usb, like a Hardlock/hardkey/keylock/HASPKey and it would look like it is connected to the virtual machine? and what about Yubico/FIDO keys? and printers? and thumbdrives? Most really heavy simulations can run better on a hefty server and not on the client machine. but licensing / management of the licenses can be a pain due the hardware keys.
  3. Not trying to abuse my stay, but could you be a little bit more detailed than this? this is on the web interface? where? I don`t have a nginx docker, so I'm supposing that this is on the nextcloud docker... it is on the command line on the docker?
  4. You are probably right, since I didn't configure anything about SSL... I would not even know how to start... how could I disable?
  5. Hi there. I just installed the docker container just as the SpaceinvaderOne instructions. Using Maria DB. It is working as intended on WAN. But I'm behind CGNat. Nothing that I can do (Internet without CGNat or a VPS are not options) I use ZeroTier to remote access my server. It is a very neat and clean way. All containers that are with bridge as network I can access normally just using the IP address from ZeroTier:Port. But the Nextcloud gives me a "400 Bad Request - The plain HTTP request was sent to HTTPS port" I tried to edit /mnt/user/appdata/nextcloud/www/nextcloud/config/config.php like this: $CONFIG = array ( 'memcache.local' => '\\OC\\Memcache\\APCu', 'datadirectory' => '/data', 'instanceid' => 'ockbsyci1slc', 'passwordsalt' => 'ImNotSureIfThisShouldBeOnTheInternet', 'secret' => 'ItReallyDoesNotSoundLikeThisShouldBeOnTheInternet', 'trusted_domains' => array ( 0 => '192.168.100.100:444', 1 => '172.25.235.156:444', ), 'dbtype' => 'mysql', 'version' => '20.0.3.2', 'overwrite.cli.url' => 'https://192.168.100.100:444', 'dbname' => 'nextcloud', 'dbhost' => '192.168.100.100:3306', 'dbport' => '', 'dbtableprefix' => 'oc_', 'mysql.utf8mb4' => true, 'dbuser' => 'nextcloud', 'dbpassword' => 'SuperDuperSecurePassword', 'installed' => true, Where 192.168.100.100 is the server local address, 444 is the port for Nextclooud and 172.25.235.156 is the server address over ZeroTierOne. but still no dice... What am missing here?
  6. Not trying to be ungrateful or anything, just wanted to know if there is a plan to upgrade the EAP controller to the new version? I'm very confused about the versions, on one site they call Omada SDN, on other they call EAP controller V4, on other they call Omada Controller V4... I believe that the Omada Controller V4 is just the new name for the EAP controller V4, and the Omada SDN is the controller on TPlink servers, provided as a service... But the question is will the app be upgraded to the V4.1.5 or it will be forever on V3.2.10?
  7. Hello there... First thing: you were supposed to get some rest! after a few hours you were back in here answering questions!! 🤣 Second thing... I guess that the folder order still have something funky going on... Initial situation: Folder 1 -> Container 1.1 - running Folder 2 -> Container 2.1 - running -> Container 2.2 - running -> Container 2.3 - running Folder 3 -> Container 3.1 - stopped So I start the container 3.1: Folder 2 (expanded but empty) Folder 1 -> Container 1.1 - running -> Container 2.1 - running -> Container 2.2 - running -> Container 2.3 - running Folder 3 -> Container 3.1 - running If I collapse and then expand the Folder 2, it became Folder 2 -> Container 2.1 - running -> Container 2.2 - running -> Container 2.3 - running Folder 1 -> Container 1.1 - running Folder 3 -> Container 3.1 - running
  8. Man, that was REALLY quick! it got 100x better, thank you! Not trying to be a pushover, but could I ask for one little thing? I have folder 1 ->docker 1.1 folder 2 ->docker 2.1 ->docker 2.2 folder 3 ->docker 3.1 ->docker 3.2 If I stop the docker 2.2, it show as follow: folder 2 ->docker 2.1 ->docker 2.2 folder 1 ->docker 1.1 folder 3 ->docker 3.1 ->docker 3.2 for some reason now the folder 2 is on top and not the folder 1... if I reload the page the order go back to normal. is there a way to keep the right order? Thank you very much!
  9. Hello GuildDarts. Huge fan of this plugin, it organized the impossible to me. Just a simple comment/nitpick I don't know about CSS, so not sure if this is by design or if this is impossible to solve. I'm on 6.8.1. I have 3 folders. the settings are: docker preview: none, Docker Icon style: Docker, Docker Expand button: right, all the other options are off. If I expand them all, and click on a container that is from the first folder, select stop, now the first folder is still expanded, but all the containers that are on the first folder are now on the last folder. If I collapse the first folder and then expand again, it all go back to normal. Also, if I reload the page, all go back to normal. The exact same thing happen when I start a container that was stopped. It is just a minor annoyance, that every time that a container is misbehaving and I wanted to stop-start the container they jump around. Is this already reported? It is just me? My explanation made any sense?? Help me obi-wan kenobi, you're my only hope.
  10. Just a quick question... Can Unraid run truly headless? Right now I have a old-ish core I5 that I'm testing as a Unraid Server. Also I have a Geforce 970 that I'm using as passthough to a Windows 10 VM. I would love to upgrade this to a Xeon (mostly for the hypertreading, but I'm avoiding I7 because the price is too much for me) My mobo does not support headless boot, but for the mobo I have a graphics card that has a valid bios that will boot just fine (the 970) right now I'm running Unraid from the IGP of the I5. If I get the Xeon I would lose the IGP... could this work in somehow? Like I don't need to use the console of the unraid right on the sever, I can always SSH to it... But it seem very strange to me boot from one video card and then dropping it to the VM and all this juggling... And although I still have one PCI-E slot, I really would like to use it for other things, and I don't have another video card to put in there.