ryperx

Members
  • Content Count

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About ryperx

  • Rank
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Can confirm this problem. In the moment i use a network in firewall the tunnel cant be started. Do you have 2 network cards/links maybe?
  2. Thanks, you are right, i see now the changelog. When i wrote the comment the changelog was empty for me
  3. There is an Update for the Wireguard Plugin, anybody knows the Changelog? Cant find any Info.
  4. I dont think another software would help much because as it looks like your Mainboard or Ram Modules have a problem when all Slots/Moduls installed. Do you have latest BIOS Version installed?
  5. I really like the aproach from the Dynamics Temp Plugin which also shows the CPU Temp directly in the CPU Utilisation in Dashboard
  6. I found the problem, on the opponent side was the ping on the wan port disabled, so i think wireguard needs to ping the WAN IP from the other side and the choosen udp port to work.
  7. @ljm42 I have another little problem with the server <-> server connection. When the connection is established it works fine and from every server i can ping the opponent server from both sides. The problem, after some time one server cant ping the other server and the connection is lost and cant be established from this server. I need to press the ping button on the opponent server and the tunnel works again (ping from both servers work) Anybody has an idea?
  8. Ok i will learn more about Wireguard. This is the only part what isnt correct as i understand, the server <-> server config exports the same settings as the lan <-> lan settings. So in the server <-> server configuration should be only the IP adress of the opponent wireguard/unraid server for example 192.168.1.1/32 and not the opponent LAN 192.168.1.0/24
  9. Thanks for your response Ah ok, so it is a setting for the client on the server and of course this would help in that way. My biggest problem with the wireguard plugin and the configuration is that i dont understand the peer settings in general. Is it for the client where i export the configuration or is it for the client on the server? It is really confusing for example the server <-> server configuration i configure the client on the server for connecting another server. This had me confused the most because i didnt understand that
  10. Slowly i begin to understand how it works but i see a little security problem if someone uses only the predefined peer types without setting the firewall settings. As i see when i set in the config "Allowed IPs" only the Server IP Adress it gets copied in the config. When the user now adds another IPs adresses from the local network, these also works. So this would mean i need to create for every user an additional tunnel (and set firewall rules for networks) when the user needs other wrigts in the network because the user could add additional routes every time? Edit: Don
  11. Another problem i got, i cant get the "Remote access to server" Configuration not working, when i choose "Remote Tunneled Server" it works without a problem and it connects instant. Cant anybody help? The only config connection that is working, is when i choose Remote Tunneled Server. The other connections doesnt work. What is the difference? I would prefer only to tunnel connections to the server through the vpn not everything Edit: I found out it isnt a problem that the tunnel is not working, the problem is that the ping from unraid to client doesnt work.
  12. Is it possible that the server <-> server setting is bugged? Problem with this setting it is also routing the local networks. It gets the exact same config with routing networks as lan <-> lan Its definitly an bug, in allowed IPs should only the IP adress of the server, but it also inserts the IP adress of the LAN network. (When you press the eye for the configuration) Also it is completly useless to set anything into "Peer allowed IPs" it ignores anything i type into this field.
  13. I repost my question in the correct thread:
  14. Thanks u 2, this feature i was looking for
  15. Sorry for reanimate this old thread, but was this feature implemented? I mean that mover starts copying files in the moment a certain amount of % are reached? As i know the maximum free space setting helps that the cache cant run completly full but wouldnt trigger the mover job or am i wrong?