epp

Members
  • Posts

    42
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by epp

  1. Hi @binhex, suddenly I'm getting this error when trying to play media on my tv:

    [Req#50a8] Unable to find client profile for device; platform=webOS, platformVersion=5.5.0, device=webOS 5.5.0, model=OLED65CX8LB

    The plex client on my tv has been updated on 2024-01-25 and worked well right after that. It seems that 1.40.0.7998 you uploaded 5 days ago might have broken that somehow. Any idea what it could be?

     

    EDIT:

    Doesn't seem to be related to your problem, getting the same issue with 1.32.8.7639-1-01. Now the quest begins to find out what broke...

     

    EDIT2:

    The media is playable with binhex-plexpass, no idea what is different there...

     

    EDIT3:

    Just to wrap up in case someone encounters the same issue: I ended up using binhex-plexpass and rescanning all my media. Restoring a backup made binhex-plexpass have the same issue. My problem is solved, I hope it doesn't happen again though.

  2. I recently updated from 6.9 to 6.12 and suddenly my GTX 650 stopped working in my windows VM. Error 43 as described in here but sadly the hidden flag fix doesn't work for me. Just to be sure I even installed a new W10 VM but without avail, error 43 persists. Any new information / ideas how to get the old card to work again?

    Or even information on how to find out if a card will work? I have no issue buying another GPU but would suck if that gets the error 43 too...

  3. Sadly the fix described there doesn't work for me. I spend 2 days testing various scenarios including setting up different kinds of windows and linux versions, I cannot get the GPU to work on windows: 43 all the time, even when adding the hidden flag, rebooting and removing the fast boot option. I didn't follow up on that since I wanted to update the GPU anyway, that's why I made this posting. Now I have problems getting a newer card working in my PCIe x4 slot so maybe I should ask there again.

  4. I recently ran into the following issue after upgrading from 6.9 to 6.12:

     

    I tried everything I could think of but cannot get the card to work in any windows VM, so I decided to finally get a new one. It's the second GPU in the system, the first one being a 3070 which works great. The 650 was only used sporadically by my wife to play Sims, so the performance requirements are super low. I still don't want to get something super old to run into similar issues in the near future. Still I need it to consume low power since the power supply isn't set up to supply two power hungry GPUs.

     

    Do you have any suggestions?

    To sum it up: Performance wise it doesn't have to be much above a 650, power consumption should be as low as possible, it should be a model that can be bought new and it should be rather cheap (lets say below $150).

  5. Hi there,

     

    after installing Docker Foder I have the issue that my container start order is all messed up. I guess I hit the reorder button at some time. I don't know how I can affect the order of containers inbetween the folders, I can only drag them along within in folders. Is there a solution for that or do I have to uninstall the plugin, reorder and then reinstall / restore Docker Folders?

  6. Hallo zusammen,

     

    witzigerweise bin ich dem Grund für das beschriebene Problem eher auf die Schliche gekommen als diesen Thread zu finden 😁

     

    Ich hatte exakt dasselbe Problem: Plexserver auf Windows installiert, alle von der Firtzbox bereitgestellten Sender werden gefunden. Plexserver als Docker Container installiert und er findet kaum was. Die Versionen waren bis auf den Build identisch. Nach Hinweis von binhex bin ich dann auf die Idee gekommen die offizielle Plexserver Linuxversion mal auszuprobieren: Es liegt tatsächlich am OS ... höchstwahrscheinlich ein Treiber Problem, was genau es ist weiß ich nicht, aber es ist nichts magisches was nur mit Docker oder den Plex Varianten von binhex & Co. zu tun hat, es ist tatsache einfach ein OS Problem.

    Ich hab xteve schon laufen, so richtig zufrieden bin ich da nicht daher werde ich mir mal TVHeadend anschauen - danke für den Hinweis hier. Ich wollte euch nur mal meine Erkenntnisse zukommen lassen, wird sicherlich immer wieder wen geben der an den Punkt gelangt...

  7. 23 hours ago, binhex said:

    my only thoughts are, where is the tuner card running?, is one running the tuner card via windows and the other time running via unraid? if so it could be a driver related problem.

    @binhex the tuner is provided by my FRITZ!Box 6591 Cable, so the same for both. But yeah, could be something OS related ... A test with the linux version of the Plex Media Server should be better then right? Will try that later.

  8. @binhex the issue I reported at the end of november of last year (see my previous posting here) still persists:

     

    When I try to set up Live TV & DVR on plexpass I get different results when performing the tuner scan on binhex-plexpass vs Plex Media Server for Windows (from plex.tv), both using the same (current) Plex version 1.25.6.5577.

     

    Here the scan result from binhex-plexpass:

    image.thumb.png.3d7c2c668d59eb08f3e3ea09aa33d48d.png

     

    And here the scan result from Plex Media Server for Windows:

     

    image.thumb.png.4476e1d49dd56be034ecb76069ae1bf9.png

     

    As you can see binhex-plexpass finds way less channels (136 vs 648), missing most of the relevant channels. The scans were done in the same way, meaning same options.

     

    What's different in binhex-plexpass and is there maybe something I could do to fix that?

  9. 5 minutes ago, alturismo said:

     

    as you see this is a real m3u8 with ABR and AR which is not to handle properly for the purpose of xteve without a complete reencoding to use in plex.

     

    ABR (Adaptive Bitrate) and AR (Adaptive Resolution) are no formats which can be simply remuxed to a .ts stream, VLC would play them, yes, but a client like Plex as sample will simple stop the playback as soon a switch comes in.

     

    so in short, nope, not supported

     

    Any way at all to convert that so it would work? I'm asking because there does not seem to exist an alternative stream for that channel, that's why I'm clinging on that straw :D

  10. I have a m3u8 that xTeVe doesn't seem to support:

    https://rbmn-live.akamaized.net/hls/live/2002830/geoSTVDEweb/master.m3u8

     

    Here's the contents:

     

    #EXTM3U
    #EXT-X-VERSION:3
    #EXT-X-INDEPENDENT-SEGMENTS
    #EXT-X-STREAM-INF:BANDWIDTH=677600,AVERAGE-BANDWIDTH=655600,CODECS="avc1.77.30,mp4a.40.2",RESOLUTION=640x360,FRAME-RATE=25.000
    https://rbmn-live.akamaized.net/hls/live/2002830/geoSTVDEweb/master_596.m3u8
    #EXT-X-STREAM-INF:BANDWIDTH=1856800,AVERAGE-BANDWIDTH=1790800,CODECS="avc1.4d401f,mp4a.40.2",RESOLUTION=960x540,FRAME-RATE=25.000
    https://rbmn-live.akamaized.net/hls/live/2002830/geoSTVDEweb/master_1628.m3u8
    #EXT-X-STREAM-INF:BANDWIDTH=3872000,AVERAGE-BANDWIDTH=3731200,CODECS="avc1.4d401f,mp4a.40.2",RESOLUTION=1280x720,FRAME-RATE=25.000
    https://rbmn-live.akamaized.net/hls/live/2002830/geoSTVDEweb/master_3392.m3u8
    #EXT-X-STREAM-INF:BANDWIDTH=7647200,AVERAGE-BANDWIDTH=7361200,CODECS="avc1.4d4028,mp4a.40.2",RESOLUTION=1920x1080,FRAME-RATE=25.000
    https://rbmn-live.akamaized.net/hls/live/2002830/geoSTVDEweb/master_6692.m3u8
    

     

    Can xTeVe handle #EXT-X-STREAM-INF?

     

    Also if I try to add any of the m3u8's listed there it says: Invalid M3U file, an extended M3U file is required.

     

    Is that just a limitation of what xTeVe can do or is there any way to get the file working?

     

     

  11. Hey @binhex,

     

    I'm trying to set up Live TV & DVR. When I do that with the official Plex Pass server (standalone edition, either on windows or mac, version 1.25.0.5246, same as here) scanning channels on my tuner results in 498 channels being found, 312 epg channels are available:
    image.png.666c6f02a97d93eef0221fba309b7eab.png

    When I do the same, meaning exactly the same channel scanning settings on binhex-plexpass (also running version 1.25.0.5246) it results in only 8 channels being found, also 312 epg channels available:
    image.png.6deb69fcb96eadd7f2f62e35040178fc.png

    I'm a bit lost now, not knowing why that might be the case. I tested the official Plex server on both windows and macos, the official docker isn't available on 1.25.0.5246, the old 1.24 version that is available also just finds a couple of channels.

     

    Can it be that there is something missing on the binhex-plexpass image in regards to the official Plex server version? It seems at least so, that whatever changed from 1.24 to 1.25 didn't get carried over into the 1.25 binhex-plexpass...

     

    Best regards,

    epp

  12. Hey @binhex, I'm having trouble getting all my tv channel scanned. I tried it with the windows version of plex and it worked. I assume it's just a version issue. Any hint then you'll be upgrading to 1.25?

     

    Edit: nevermind, just realized the plexpass version fits my needs.

  13. Hey there, not sure if this is an acutal issue or paperless-ng was never intended to do such things...

     

    My HP LaserJet Pro MFP M428fdw doesn't seem to be able to remove blank pages when scanning to a network drive. Since I'm always scanning both sides of a document and my wife tends to put the docs in the wrong way, all paperless-ng previews show a blank page.

    Is there a way to make paperless remove any black pages? If not, have you encountered the same issue and how have you fixed it?

    Maybe there's a way to add some pre processing of the input PDFs... Just an idea.

     

    Best regards, epp

  14. On 1/7/2019 at 1:19 PM, binhex said:

    so if plex picks up host config then you should simply set the proxy by issuing the following commands inside the container, if it works then i can look at allowing users to define this via env var.

     export http_proxy=http://<ip address of your unraid server>:<port number for privoxy>/
     export https_proxy=https://<ip address of your unraid server>:<port number for privoxy>/

     

     

    Hey @binhex, it took almost 2 years till someone tested that but I can report it works. Added env vars for http_proxy and https_proxy manually, maybe empty defaults for those could be added to make others aware of that functionality.

     

    FYI why I needed to use this: I have trouble tunneling plex through a VPN container via --net=container:. The Plex app on my LG CX TV (WebOS 6.0) times out, Android or web Plex does work though. I assume it's iptables related but couldn't figgure out what was causing it. I reported that in your binhex - Plex thread.

     

    EDIT: I had to revert the proxy settings, for some reason it made my TV start transcoding stuff... :/

  15. Hi all,

     

    I tried setting up the plex container to use the network of sabnzbdvpn - I've done so for many other containers with success. In the browser and android app that works, what I can't get to work is the app on my LG TV. Any idea what that could be? I replicated all the port rules from the plex container ... here are the port mappings:

     

    172.17.0.4:1900/UDP10.18.10.2:1900
    172.17.0.4:3005/TCP10.18.10.2:3005
    172.17.0.4:32400/TCP10.18.10.2:32400
    172.17.0.4:32410/UDP10.18.10.2:32410
    172.17.0.4:32412/UDP10.18.10.2:32412
    172.17.0.4:32413/UDP10.18.10.2:32413
    172.17.0.4:32414/UDP10.18.10.2:32414
    172.17.0.4:32469/TCP10.18.10.2:32469
    172.17.0.4:8324/TCP10.18.10.2:8324

     

    Also I set up those variables:

     

    VPN_INPUT_PORTS
    8989,9897,7878,6767,8181,1900,3005,32400,32410,32412,32413,32414,32469,8324
    
    VPN_OUTPUT_PORTS
    32400

     

    Not sure about VPN_OUTPUT_PORTS but it doesn't work either if I remove it.

     

    Any idea what might be blocking the TV app to see the server?

     

    PS: It's an LG CX so WebOS 6.0 with the official Plex app.

     

  16. Hey Jonathan,

     

    here's the stuff you've asked for:

     

    slave container:

    docker run -d --name='binhex-sonarr' -e TZ="Europe/Berlin" -e HOST_OS="Unraid" -e 'UMASK'='000' -e 'PUID'='99' -e 'PGID'='100' -v '/mnt/user/downloads/nzbget/':'/data':'rw' -v '/mnt/user/tvshows/':'/media':'rw' -v '/mnt/user/appdata/binhex-sonarr':'/config':'rw' --net=container:nzbgetvpn 'binhex/arch-sonarr'

    host container:

    docker run -d --name='nzbgetvpn' --net='bridge' --privileged=true -e TZ="Europe/Berlin" -e HOST_OS="Unraid" -e 'VPN_ENABLED'='yes' -e 'STRONG_CERTS'='no' -e 'VPN_USER'='VPN_USER' -e 'VPN_PASS'='VPN_PASS' -e 'VPN_REMOTE'='nl.privateinternetaccess.com' -e 'VPN_PORT'='1198' -e 'VPN_PROV'='pia' -e 'VPN_PROTOCOL'='udp' -e 'LAN_NETWORK'='10.18.10.0/24' -p '6789:6789/tcp' -p '8989:8989/tcp' -p '9897:9897/tcp' -v '/mnt/user/downloads/nzbget/':'/data':'rw' -v '/etc/localtime':'/etc/localtime':'ro' -v '/mnt/user/appdata/nzbgetvpn':'/config':'rw' 'jshridha/docker-nzbgetvpn'

    an I'm expecting the slave container's UI to be reachable under

    10.18.10.2/8989

     

  17. Hello,

     

    I've set up one of my containers network traffic to be routed through the network of another one, basicly what spaceinvaderone describes in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znSu_FuKFW0

     

    Now internally everything works, the "slave" container gets the network connection from the host and everything is operational. The one thing I cannot figure out is how to access the slave containers web UI. I've tried adding the ports to the master (as said in the video above), recreating the containers, using different containers (and images) entirely, but nothing helps.

    In the comments of the video linkes above someone seems to recently had the same problem, asking if the new unraid ssl cert might be causing issues with port passthroughs. I have no idea how that could be related but I thought I'd mention it here...

     

    Any ideas? :/

     

    Best regards, epp

     

  18. Hallo zusammen,

     

    ich wollte mal nachfragen was so die gängige Vorgehensweise beim Absichern von Seedboxen ist. Ich überlege ob ich obendrauf noch ein VPN setze, einfach um eine weitere Absicherungsstufe zu haben - schlechte Erfahrungen mit Abmahnkanzleien lassen grüßen...

    Leider ist das Meiste was man im Netz dazu findet mit Werbung zugekleistert, daher wollte ich mal sehen was der normale User dazu sagt.

     

    Danke schonmal!

    LG, epp

  19. Hello,

     

    I have an ASrock x570m Pro4 board and a Intel AX200 M.2 WiFi / BT module installed. Passthrough of the WiFi network controller works without a hitch but I struggle with the BT module... It's recognized as an USB device (via M.2 type E) and added to USB bus 1. The problem is that my unraid USB drive which is installed internally is also added to USB bus 1 and since it's on the same controller, I cannot pass it through my VM. I tried different internal USB ports, the drive is always recognized as being connected to bus 1. I have no idea how to influence where the BT module is connected to, I assume it's fixed on bus 1.

     

    Any idea how to split those two up? I guess plugging in the USB drive to an external port might do the trick, but I don't want to break up my neat build...


    Hope someone has an idea!

    Thanks, Denis

  20. 3 hours ago, Saeros said:

    Als Software würde ich Dir von Duplicati abraten, läuft bei den meisten anfangs gut, dann wird irgendwann die Datenbank korrupt (merkst du dann erst beim Restore). Ich hatte jede Menge Beiträge dazu im unRAID Reddit gelesen und dann mal mein Backup getestet - siehe da: korrupt.

    Ich nutze jetzt Duplicacy (kostet bisschen was, aber absolut ok, 30 Tage Trial) weil ich ne grafische Oberfläche will, ansonsten gibt es auch schöne Lösungen mit rclone (scriptbasiert) und Borg.

     

    Vielen Dank für den Hinweis auch an @vakilando, das war mir bisher noch nicht bekannt. Ich schau es mir später mal an.