binhex
-
Posts
7898 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
37
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by binhex
-
-
On 3/4/2024 at 11:13 AM, Soundwork said:
readnatpmpresponseorretry() failed : the gateway does not support nat-pmp
i am assuming you are a protonvpn user, i would also assume from that error that protonvpn has been shutting down or changing some of their servers, go download a fresh config file from them and it should fix it.
-
18 hours ago, IMACRAB said:
What would be a good way to figure that out?
do this:-
Left click the prowlarr container and select 'Edit', make any change to a value, then switch it back to what it was and click on 'Apply', then copy and paste the 'Command execution' shown to a file, ensuring to remove any reference to username and password, then attach the file here.
-
1 minute ago, IMACRAB said:
Thanks for coming back to me on this!
That's very odd, because that is exactly what I did.I did not change anything throughout the installation of FlareSolverr either.
And I got the following error from prowlarr when clicking to 'test':
are you sharing networkkng with another container, for example vpn container? if you are and you are using one of my images then you will need to define the port in/out (depeds on setup).
-
For completeness here is what the Jackett configuration looks like for Flaresolverr, just go to Jackett WebUI scroll down to 'Jackett Configuration' and configure the URL for Flaresolverr, e.g.:-
-
7 hours ago, T_Matz said:
So i am unable to connect to my deluge docker when VPN is enabled, but if its disabled i can connect to the docker just fine
all my arrs are able to connect to the deluge docker regardless, and there are no errors in the log file. not sure what to check any help pointing me in the right direction would be appreciated.
do this:- https://github.com/binhex/documentation/blob/master/docker/faq/help.md#unraid-users
-
41 minutes ago, IMACRAB said:
When I start flaresolverr however, the webUI shows the following:
There is no webui for this image, it is purely command line and there is nothing to configure on the flaresolverr end, you simply point prowlarr/jackett at flaresolverr and you are done.
i am using this myself, an example setup defined in prowlarr:-
once defined here you then add 'tags' to each index site which then links it to flaresolverr.
-
On 3/1/2024 at 5:17 AM, couzin2000 said:
but Preferences.xml is not part of the container if I'm not mistaken
correct, it's not part of the image, its generated when you configure plex.
On 3/1/2024 at 5:17 AM, couzin2000 said:Still not sure how to recup this file.
before getting into that it might be worth working out if you have database corruption or not, see Q4:- https://github.com/binhex/documentation/blob/master/docker/faq/plex.md and if so move onto Q5.
-
On 2/22/2024 at 11:36 PM, Bitbass said:
I have a "transcode" folder in my cache that's gotten rather large. This is for plexpass. Most of the dates are from over a year ago. Is this some stranded content? Is it safe to delete it?
yes its safe to delete, just shutdown the container first to ensure no active transcodes are in progress, then delete and then start container again.
-
reserved
-
Overview: Support for Docker image arch-flaresolverr in the binhex repo.
Application: Flaresolverr - https://github.com/FlareSolverr/FlareSolverr
Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/r/binhex/arch-flaresolverr/
GitHub: https://github.com/binhex/arch-flaresolverr
Documentation: https://github.com/binhex/documentation
If you appreciate my work, then please consider buying me a beer 😁
For other Docker support threads and requests, news and Docker template support for the binhex repository please use the "General" thread here
-
1 hour ago, NLS said:
That was a bad misquote.
I wasn't the one I said that it is a risk, I said the opposite.
Sorry, yep i know you were saying the opposite, not sure how that got misquoted 🙂
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, xceph said:
database disk image is malformed
your database is corrupt and needs to be fixed up.
-
1 minute ago, NLS said:
Is it not a security problem to have loads of unused open ports?
That depends, if you trust every device on your LAN (normal) AND you do not port forward all the ports then the risk is close to zero as nobody from the outside world (untrustworthy) can connect.
that being said, if you want to change the port range then simply delete the existing port range (cannot change an existing port or range of ports) and then create a new port range to your liking.
-
1
-
-
11 hours ago, jbuszkie said:
My version is Version 4.7.14.0 and it looks like there is a "Emby Server 4.8.1.0 is Available" I'm wondering if the latest version will fix my issue...
its automated, there is a slight delay of an hour or so, so expect an update soon.
-
There is no support for automatic port assignment from that VPN provider
Thank you. Do you happen to know how to use the dynamic port forwarding of hide.me in qbittorrent? If yes, how do I configure it?
Sent from my 22021211RG using Tapatalk
-
There is a big difference, proxy will forward HTTPS traffic only, whereas binding network ensures ALL traffic is sent down the VPN tunnel
Got it. But what's the difference between routing any container using privoxyvpn and setting up proxy settings in, say for example, sonarr/radarr like spaceinvader one did here?
To be clear, for sonarr proxy is fine as it is HTTPS traffic only
Sent from my 22021211RG using Tapatalk
-
1
-
-
15 minutes ago, HHUBS said:
that I need to input 8080 for qbittorrent gui in VPN_OUTPUT_PORTS. However, I can't access the gui unless I set it in the VPN_INPUT_PORTS. May I ask what's the difference between the two?
read the description for the above keys here:- https://github.com/binhex/documentation/blob/master/docker/guides/vpn.md
-
22 minutes ago, CopesaCola said:
I'm pretty sure it's Intel, I'm running a TerraMaster F2-223 if that helps
19 minutes ago, CopesaCola said:Dual-Core N4505 Processor
not gone through this as i have a discrete nvidia card, but this looks like it should guide you through it:-
-
12 hours ago, STABILO-BOSS said:
Hi binhex
Having an issue, hope you can advise
Plex Issues
Server was off for around 3months
Changed hardware, booted, Plex etc was working fine
Updated Unraid and all apps, dockers etc
Soon realised that Plex was no longer functioningCurrent Unraid Version: 6.12.6
Plex Docker: binhex-plex
Current Plex Version: binhex/arch-plex:1.32.5.7516-1-02 (It was on the most recent when i experienced the issues)The logs are telling me this:
Error: Unable to set up server: sqlite3_statement_backend::loadOne: attempt to write a readonly database (N4soci10soci_errorE)Things I have tried so far
1. Shut no shut container
2. Followed steps in this thread:
3. Tried running the db repair tool, but I dont believe I have a DB corruption issue, I followed that batch script from github and then tried manually, I got:
root@server:/mnt/user/appdata/binhex-plex/databasetools/plexmediaserver# ./"Plex SQLite" "/mnt/cache/appdata/binhex-plex/Plex Media Server/Pl
ug-in Support/Databases/com.plexapp.plugins.library.db" "PRAGMA integrity_check"
ok4. I tried changing plex versions by amending the binhex tags to a few previous versions, but still same issue.
I am not 100% sure on what to do next, maybe remove container and go again?
Cheers
sounds like permissions issues to me, try stopping the container then delete the file /config/perms.txt, then start the container, be patient this will be resetting permissions for all files and folders within your /config folder, it may a few minutes then see if you have access.
-
1
-
-
27 minutes ago, CopesaCola said:
I am having trouble hardware transcoding, I just bought a plex pass and am not sure what I am doing wrong.
Assuming you have a discrete graphics card and its nvidia follow Q3:- https://github.com/binhex/documentation/blob/master/docker/faq/plex.md
-
10 minutes ago, [email protected] said:
I'm confused. This is not my issue.... Q32. I can access the Web UI for the application when connected to my LAN, but when i connect to my LAN via a VPN connection i can no longer access the Web UI, why is this and how do i fix it?
these are not the droids you're looking for :-), check who i am replying to.
-
On 2/6/2024 at 2:14 PM, ArrDee said:
However, if i use wireguard and vpn to the home network, I can no longer connect to the service
totally expected, see Q32:- https://github.com/binhex/documentation/blob/master/docker/faq/vpn.md
-
4 minutes ago, nickydd9 said:
@binhex I am betting your "host access to custom networks" is probably disabled which is why you wouldn't hit the qbit container with a custom br0 IP. As described in the Unraid Docs:
Thanks for this, i am connecting differently as i have a pfsense box running wireguard and i connect in over that, so perhaps im missing some configuration, in any case im happy that you can connect fine with a custom bridge, and hopefully the above might help somebody else out 🙂
-
1
-
-
On 2/5/2024 at 1:01 AM, nickydd9 said:
Yes absolutely. From another laptop and a desktop both addressed inside of 192.168.1.0/24 I am able to hit the Web UI of the qbit container (192.168.1.50:8080), which is why I am confused with you saying it shouldn't work.
i did some investigation into this and it looks like something has changed, either unraid related, docker related or wireguard related, in any case this is the curent state of things:-
vpn - custom bridge vs 'bridge' -------------------------------- with custom bridge with specific ip wireguard can access the webui from lan cannot access the webui from remote over vpn cannot access the webui from port forward openvpn cannot access webui from lan cannot access the webui from remote over vpn cannot access the webui from port forward with 'bridge wireguard can acccess the webui from the lan can access the webui from remote over vpn cannot access the webui from port forward openvpn can access the webui from lan can access the webui from remote over vpn can access the webui from port forwardso as you can see from the above, best connectivity is from 'bridge' mode using openvpn, second is 'bridge' mode using wireguard, however accessing the web ui over a simple port forward when using wireguard does not work, even in bridge mode.
so you currently have it set to wireguard with a custom bridge, which will get you access to the web ui, but will not permit access to the web ui when remoting in over vpn (at least not in my testing it didnt!).
[Support] binhex - Krusader
in Docker Containers
Posted
firstly this is an unraid issue it is not image related, check that you are not using a specific tagged version, this can sometimes confuse the unraid webui into thinking there is an update, to do this left click krusader, select edit, the toggle 'advanced view' and check the repository, it should be 'binhex/arch-krusader', if this is ok then please post the issue at https://forums.unraid.net/forum/58-docker-engine/