Everything posted by flyize
-
Where do I set minimum free space for Cache?
I'm reading over an older thread that mentions setting the minimum free space for the Cache in Global Share Settings, like this: I don't have that UI at all. I'm running 6.10.0-rc2. Has it moved someplace else?
-
[Support] binhex - Plex
I'm getting a few reports of this as well. A friend reported that it worked on one device, but not another. And my mother says she can't connect at all. Did you ever find a solution? edit: It's actually a side effect of this. https://forums.plex.tv/t/important-information-about-plex-for-smart-tvs-after-september-30-2021/746506
-
[Support] binhex - Sonarr
Sonarr is down. Apparently it's certificates are too old? [v3.0.6.1342] System.Net.WebException: Error: TrustFailure (Authentication failed, see inner exception.): 'https://skyhook.sonarr.tv/v1/tvdb/shows/en/362829' ---> System.Net.WebException: Error: TrustFailure (Authentication failed, see inner exception.) ---> System.Security.Authentication.AuthenticationException: Authentication failed, see inner exception. ---> Mono.Btls.MonoBtlsException: Ssl error:1000007d:SSL routines:OPENSSL_internal:CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED Created a github issue here: https://github.com/binhex/arch-sonarr/issues/19
-
Very high cpu by shfs, whats going on? (Diagnostics included)
Oh wow. Thank you!
-
Very high cpu by shfs, whats going on? (Diagnostics included)
-
Very high cpu by shfs, whats going on? (Diagnostics included)
I did some quick Googles and came up blank. How do I see IOWAIT?
-
Very high cpu by shfs, whats going on? (Diagnostics included)
While probably not the best answer, I'm going to try 6.10 RC2. This is driving me crazy.
-
Very high cpu by shfs, whats going on? (Diagnostics included)
I saw your post in the other thread. Hopefully someone will have an idea. I've got a 20 core Xeon CPU that's getting absolutely crushed at times.
-
Very high cpu by shfs, whats going on? (Diagnostics included)
Attaching another diag from today, in hopes that someone can shed some light on this. Whatever is going on is crushing the server. truffle-diagnostics-20211229-1313.zip
-
Very high cpu by shfs, whats going on? (Diagnostics included)
I'm hoping someone can help me out. I've recently noticed shfs taking a ton of CPU. In my searches, I found reference to a caching plugin that can cause this issue, but I don't have that plugin installed. What else could I look at? truffle-diagnostics-20211228-0903.zip
-
[Support] Machinaris - Chia cryptocurrency farming + Plotman plotting + Unraid WebUI
-
[Support] Machinaris - Chia cryptocurrency farming + Plotman plotting + Unraid WebUI
So the quoted part of the wiki is incorrect then?
-
[Support] Machinaris - Chia cryptocurrency farming + Plotman plotting + Unraid WebUI
The wiki says this But then further down in the wiki, it seems to suggest that Chia plots won't work. Am I reading this incorrectly?
-
[Support] Machinaris - Chia cryptocurrency farming + Plotman plotting + Unraid WebUI
That seems to have worked. Thanks!
-
[Support] Machinaris - Chia cryptocurrency farming + Plotman plotting + Unraid WebUI
Oops. So sorry I missed where you spelled that out in the notes. Thanks! edit: Uh-oh. How do I fix the error if I want to stay on .60 for now? Stopping flora and rebooting the main didn't work.
-
[Support] Machinaris - Chia cryptocurrency farming + Plotman plotting + Unraid WebUI
Looks like I'm getting a new error from flora: 2021-10-19 12:12:47 [906] [ERROR] Exception on /index [GET] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/chia-blockchain/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 2073, in wsgi_app response = self.full_dispatch_request() File "/chia-blockchain/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1518, in full_dispatch_request rv = self.handle_user_exception(e) File "/chia-blockchain/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1516, in full_dispatch_request rv = self.dispatch_request() File "/chia-blockchain/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1502, in dispatch_request return self.ensure_sync(self.view_functions[rule.endpoint])(**req.view_args) File "/machinaris/web/routes.py", line 34, in index farm_summary = chia.load_farm_summary() File "/machinaris/web/actions/chia.py", line 40, in load_farm_summary return FarmSummary(farms, wallets) File "/machinaris/web/models/chia.py", line 55, in __init__ "currency_symbol": CURRENCY_SYMBOLS[farm_rec.blockchain], KeyError: 'flora'
-
[Support] Machinaris - Chia cryptocurrency farming + Plotman plotting + Unraid WebUI
I'm seeing this error. 2021-10-19 10:49:19 [920] [ERROR] Exception on / [GET] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/chia-blockchain/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 2073, in wsgi_app response = self.full_dispatch_request() File "/chia-blockchain/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1518, in full_dispatch_request rv = self.handle_user_exception(e) File "/chia-blockchain/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1516, in full_dispatch_request rv = self.dispatch_request() File "/chia-blockchain/venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1502, in dispatch_request return self.ensure_sync(self.view_functions[rule.endpoint])(**req.view_args) File "/machinaris/web/routes.py", line 19, in landing gc = globals.load() File "/machinaris/common/config/globals.py", line 82, in load cfg['blockchain_version'] = load_blockchain_version(enabled_blockchains()[0]) IndexError: list index out of range edit: And I *think* I followed the upgrade doc... edit: FIXED. I missed the original blockchain variable and added a second. It didn't like that.
-
Fix Common Problems is reporting one of my drives full. That's fine by me, but will it cause any problems?
That would result in almost 1TB of slack. Ouch
-
Fix Common Problems is reporting one of my drives full. That's fine by me, but will it cause any problems?
I have since freed up some space, but its XFS.
-
Fix Common Problems is reporting one of my drives full. That's fine by me, but will it cause any problems?
Oh! I see now. Got it!
-
Fix Common Problems is reporting one of my drives full. That's fine by me, but will it cause any problems?
If the mover can't tell the drive selection process the size of the file, why does minimum file size on a share matter?
-
Fix Common Problems is reporting one of my drives full. That's fine by me, but will it cause any problems?
Wait, what? Write a 60GB file to a share where minimum free is only 50GB? These files are coming from a cache drive first, so it should know the size, right? I'm missing something here.
-
Fix Common Problems is reporting one of my drives full. That's fine by me, but will it cause any problems?
Minimum free space is set to 50GB. I assume your suggestion of media getting replaced is how it got so full. edit: If it matters, split level is on auto and allocation is high water. edit2: No that can't be right. If Sonarr replaces something, its a different file name. How did this drive get so full?
-
Fix Common Problems is reporting one of my drives full. That's fine by me, but will it cause any problems?
Yes, I have minimum free space set, but there's like 100k left on the drive. Is there a scenario where it would try to put even a 200k file on the drive?
-
Fix Common Problems is reporting one of my drives full. That's fine by me, but will it cause any problems?
As title suggests, I'm fine with the drive being full unless it presents some sort of problems. Logging maybe? No idea. What say you geniuses?