luhzifer
-
Posts
19 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by luhzifer
-
-
40 minutes ago, SmartPhoneLover said:
Hello, you have to remove, as you said before, that line from the template if not in use.
I described that in the NOTES section:
To override the default background included, use the 'Storage (background)' line below. Do not forget to create the required directory tree and keep the same filename plus extension, before building the container. If not used, delete that setting from template.
thx mate, and sry for my disability to read
-
1
-
-
I get an error when installing:
root@localhost:# /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix.docker.manager/scripts/docker run -d --name='todoMini' --net='bridge' -e TZ="Europe/Berlin" -e HOST_OS="Unraid" -p '8047:80/tcp' -v '/mnt/user/appdata/minitodo/stardust.png':'/var/www/public/img/stardust.png':'ro' 'brettdocker/minitodo' 0a9527db26321aeaf7bf3fb2a2558ba59291d3b12e6ae6915bf4cb44849658c5 docker: Error response from daemon: OCI runtime create failed: container_linux.go:367: starting container process caused: process_linux.go:495: container init caused: rootfs_linux.go:60: mounting "/mnt/user/appdata/minitodo/stardust.png" to rootfs at "/var/lib/docker/btrfs/subvolumes/abfff6b0417d497b5697b1ac8cb858e97b494eca230dfda9c6f8b9b18b934232/var/www/public/img/stardust.png" caused: not a directory: unknown: Are you trying to mount a directory onto a file (or vice-versa)? Check if the specified host path exists and is the expected type. The command failed.Maybe the stardust.png should be removed by default from this field
-
On 12/9/2021 at 12:24 AM, dakipro said:
I am having exact same issue as you @luhzifer, I do not use system level proxy, but privoxy has its port open, and firefox on one of my machines is configured to use it. Worked fine, but problems strangely started few months ago. Changing the PIA endpoints didn't help, restarting helps from time to time, but... it is very annoying.
I think it has something with DSN/CDN's to do, as once all requests are resolved the speed is at max, but I haven't found time to investigate further to be honest. Hoped to just find a solution here, as usual
Yes it sounds pretty much like my problems here... But I also have very little time to mess with it so I mostly use this machine while doing something else and just click from time to time
I'll let you know when I find out someting. -
41 minutes ago, binhex said:
speedtest website will use the proxy, as its http/https however the actual speed test itself probably is not using http/https and thus is bypassing the vpn and going directly over your internet connection, thats why its showing as 'running at full speed'.
Ok - thank you for making me a little smarter and the honor of taking care of my problems
much appreciated!
I will then take care of the other ones involved - maybe i'll spot the villain sometime ^^ -
24 minutes ago, binhex said:
sorry that makes no sense to me, you set deluge up as a proxy?, you mean delugevpn is running and privoxy is enabled and you are pointing your browser at the proxy right?
Yes, sorry for my bad expressions 🙈
24 minutes ago, binhex said:when you say vpn is active, you mean delugevpn is running and connected to your vpn provider?, i just want to ensure you arent running a vpn client on the OS
correct
25 minutes ago, binhex said:so im assuming this is the crux of the issue right, its slow, if so try another endpoint, it will be related to your VPN provider
that's what i thought, too, but for example:
If i go to speedtest dot net, the page builds up veeeery slowly but then, once the test is started, it is running at full speed.Is what i did even meaningful? Because i only entered a proxy for http/https
thanks and sorry in advance 😅
-
7 minutes ago, binhex said:
this is not how proxies work, proxy is done at the application level not the OS level, and also privoxy (proxy server included) can only proxy HTTP and HTTPS traffic, so unless your app is set to use the proxy AND uses those protocols then it will simply bypass the proxy.
yes, you're right. I forgot to mention, that i also set set deluge up as proxy in the browser's settings... tested with both, chrome and firefox.
BUT:- If I set Firefox to 'Use System Proxy Settings', vpn is active, Firefox is slow and it show the foreign ip when checked online
- If I set Firefox to 'No Proxy', vpn is inactive and Firefox is fast
- If I set Firefox to 'Manual Proxy Config', it's the same as 'Use System Proxy Settings'...
So there must be some sort of proxy on OS level here, right?
-
Hey yall, i have some weird speed problems with the Proxy functionality of delugevpn...
The problem is, that within my browser, everything is ultra slow, but as soon as i start a download, the speed is maxed out (speedtest maxed out aswell).
Config is:
Delugevpn with openVPN settings and Proxy enabled (hide.me is the provider here. I tested with different countries)
Ubuntu VM with Proxy set up in system settings, so that every application uses the VPN
Has anybody an idea how this can be fixed? Also, it worked well at the beginning and then switched to this mystic behavior without any changes made to the system.
Thx in advance!
-
Hey everybody,
yesterday I added two drives to my array and when I chose to use 'xfs - encrypted', unRAID didnt ask for a password... So I am wondering now, what the password has been set to.
Can anybody clarify?
-
1 hour ago, ich777 said:
Remove the bak file.
Also have you stopped the container in the first place before doing this?
You can also edit the file and replace the world over SMB...
Are you also made sure that you've created a Journey world?
Ok, so after removing the .bak file, it worked
ty very much
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, ich777 said:
Please read the last post again.
Yes it is the serverconfig.txt and also you have to create a Journey world on your local computer and replace it on the server, otherwise it won't work, can just connect fine on my server.
Hmm.. I did that.. but I try again tomorrow. Thx so far for your time!
-
7 minutes ago, ich777 said:
Looking at this it says that you have to change the difficulty to 3 in the server.cfg then it is set to Journey mode (of course stop the container first before you change the value), but I actually don't know if it works with the world that I've ship with the server but at least you can try it or create the Journey world on your local computer and copy it over.
is it the 'serverconfig.txt'? Don't see config.cfg
Tried to change it there with no luck...
-
2 hours ago, ich777 said:
You can try to create a world on your local computer, select Journey mode and copy over the created world to the server (btw make sure that it's named "world").
Hope that makes sense to you...
Sadly it didn't work 😪
Still same Error msg. after Container restart
'Only Non-Journey characters may enter a Non-Journey server.'
I guess it won't work then - right?
-
55 minutes ago, ich777 said:
You can try to create a world on your local computer, select Journey mode and copy over the created world to the server (btw make sure that it's named "world").
Hope that makes sense to you...
Ok nice, will give it a try
ty bud
-
1
-
-
38 minutes ago, ich777 said:
Can you give me a link to what the "Journey" version is?
Sorry, 'version' is the wrong wording here - it's a mode
-
Hi, is there a way to play the Journey-version of Terraria on the Docker container? Is says it wasn't possible to play Journey on a non-Journey server
-
Ok, cool. So if I was to enable the communication to my router only, it would be what I need, I guess... Thanks for your reply
-
Hey guys, I am a new unRAID user and somehow can't seem to find a solution for my problem. I want to setup a VM dedicated to running a VITE (crypto currency) full-node. Therefor it needs to be quite exposed and i am afraid of intruders
So here's the plan, I was trying to find a realisation for but unfortunately could not:
- I have 3 NICs (1 onboard + dual NIC PCIe card)
- I like to dedicate 1 NIC to the (ubuntu server) VM
- I like to configure the VM so that it can access WAN but not LAN
Is there a possibility for my wishes to become reality or is it too much of config and care?
Thanks in advance 😘
-
Hi, sorry for grave robbing on this one, but did you have success with your link to the container? If yes, could you provide your solution?
Greets
ty very much
Grant rights to manage one / some docker containers to external user
in General Support
Posted
Hey there, I somehow cannot find an answer to my needs (and maybe there is none ^^ )
So I want a friend of mine to be able to manage a Docker Container of a Game Server we use. Is there some way to achieve that? Best would be to grant access to only appdata/{gameserverdocker} and to start/stop/restart the container. Alternatively it could maybe work over ssh/scp aswell but then when we install stuff like nano and so on, we would have to redo everything after every container update, which would be a struggle...
Is there something that can satisfy my special needs? 😆
Thx in advance!