Aeloth

btw I work thanks to the DNS record SRV, without adding a port for the domain, then I connect via mc.domain.eu only.

The only way I've found that works for me is: Port mapping on router 25565:25565, and on dns set - A, CNAME, SRV record unfortunately this is outside of nginx but I have docker in a separate proxynet. I strongly recommend making a whitelist in minecraft.

Hi, when installing the container it throws me this error: docker: Error response from daemon: error while creating mount source path '/mnt/user/Nextcloud/BackupData': mkdir /mnt/user/Nextcloud/BackupData: no space left on device. I still have 610GB of free space. Otherwise, I have another Nextcloud and it tells me directly in nextcloud that there is no space and that it cannot write to the log. Any solution? From Unraid: From Nextcloud container: aelothtower-diagnostics-20240510-1616.zip

I bought a LSI SAS 9300-16i from aliexpress and I have to say that I have no problem so far. I have 16 drives connected to it. However, I had to mount a fan on the heatsink. I miss the temperature monitoring of that controller. I'll have to look somewhere to see how to do that.

Hi, I have a problem with NPM with a combination of Authentik and Sonarr/Radarr .... when I set custom locations it goes offline... LOG NGINX: [3/27/2024] [2:56:04 PM] [Nginx ] › ⬤ debug Deleting file: /data/nginx/proxy_host/47.conf.err [3/27/2024] [2:56:04 PM] [Nginx ] › ⬤ debug Could not delete file: { "errno": -2, "code": "ENOENT", "syscall": "unlink", "path": "/data/nginx/proxy_host/47.conf.err" } [3/27/2024] [2:56:04 PM] [Global ] › ⬤ debug CMD: /usr/sbin/nginx -t -g "error_log off;" [3/27/2024] [2:56:04 PM] [Nginx ] › ℹ info Reloading Nginx [3/27/2024] [2:56:04 PM] [Global ] › ⬤ debug CMD: /usr/sbin/nginx -s reload

Hello is it possible to use this kontroller LSI SAS 9300-16i??? I'm lost in this so I'm hoping someone knowledgeable can advise. Thank you very much.

And how would I be able to connect 20 disks to this motherboard ? But what can I replace it with? I don't want to buy a new setup, I built this one about a year ago.

I checked the cables and eventually replaced the disk, parity stuck at 47% with a full log, I couldn't help but restart the server even canceling parity didn't help. In the log there was a problem with disk 1 which had 8mil. errors on it from parity check. i checked the cables again and found a problem with the molex cable, fixed it had a sync. done and fine and this morning disk 3 disconnected... so i repaired the cables and now i'm counting parity again. The diagnostics file is before the last cable check. aelothtower-diagnostics-20240226-2115.zip

Is it possible to use permissions like this in a container?? PUID=99 PGID=100 I don't really understand this yet.

This container doesn't have any GUI, if you want to look at it, it's pk1057/veeam12 on DockerHub. I have Root Privileges set, I have strong passwords there too, hopefully that will be enough, the container will only work on a local network in a home environment.

The change may have been historical, to me it was a container that is not in Apps but in dockerhub, it is a container that should help with backups using Veeam but I need it to have access to /mnt to be able to backup to unassigned drives. However I was struggling with the container not wanting to mount /mnt, eventually solved by reinstalling the container. But I fixed the permissions on /mnt as they should be and so far no container or plugin has changed it. I hope it's ok now.

I don't have the option to run in safe mode at the moment, that won't happen until tomorrow/the day after. However, shouldn't it be a problem to change them now?? chgrp root /mnt && chown root /mnt

What permissions should the /mnt folder have?? I'm solving one container where I want it to have access to /mnt and I currently have the permissions (see image). And I don't want a security problem.

Hello, I would like to ask how to write to syslinux config... meaning the shape of the write. kernel /bzimage append initrd=/bzroot pcie_aspm=off append initrd=/bzroot unraidcgroup2 is this the correct form of notation? or should it be written differently? for example: kernel /bzimage append initrd=/bzroot pcie_aspm=off unraidcgroup2 Thanks for the answers.

I had to run unraid in an older version to see for myself, and you're right!, sorry about that. Apparently I got it mixed up with something. 😁

What I meant to say is that these two folders are there and were originally visible (in my opinion) in the move/copy dialog of DynamixFileManager. But there is no point in dwelling on that. The main idea @dopeytree understood.

According to me it was possible, but the user shares were hidden under the user and user0 directory, if I remember correctly. It is also possible that I am wrong.

If you are copying/moving from (Shares), Shares will be displayed, if you are copying/moving from (Main), Disks will be displayed. But yes, user and user0 have disappeared here.

I have a problem that one disk in my array failed, with it becoming unsupported fs, unraid offered me to format it so I took it out of the array, formatted it, powered on the array without it and then reassigned it and let it count parity, unfortunately in this case I lost the data on this drive, (if anyone knows how to recover it I would be glad). So I'm looking for another disk and in between something happened and it started throwing a lot of disk errors in my syslog. input output error or something. Can the more experienced ones please help me? aelothtower-diagnostics-20240220-0846.zip

Actually I don't split the cpus pinnings on the server at all, I give everyone the maximum, I don't know if I'm doing it right or not, but I have 51 containers in the docker and 31 of them are running. and 1 VM.. maybe try another minecraft container, i actually have another one... from fithwum but that's also with fabric loader.

I have set XMX_SIZE to 4G, XMS_SIZE to 2G and XMN_SIZE to 2G and it works relatively well with 3 players. I wouldn't worry about CPU pinning. I let it decide for itself how many cores to use. I have another 10 mods running on my server. Next, I have set: view-distance=10 Maybe you need more CPU cores. I guess

I ran into a problem today, when I looked at the server I saw that my docker wasn't working. So I downloaded the diagnostics and tried to turn the service back on. Without success. So I restarted the whole server. The docker booted up, but after a while the server was unavailable. So i waited and after a while the webui loaded, saying that the cpu was running at 100%. I checked via ssh on htop and found that, dockerd service was using cpu at 600% after a few more minutes the utilization fixed to a few percent so i downloaded the diagnostics again. However, the cpu is running at 100% again. Can you advise me what to do?? Unraid 6.12.5-rc1 can't it be after the Unraid update?? I updated it about 2 days ago. I am attaching both files from the diagnostics, before and after the reboot. aelothtower-diagnostics-20231130-0923.zip aelothtower-diagnostics-20231130-0836.zip EDIT: after updating to STABLE 6.12.5 it looks like it's ok now but I'll keep an eye on it.

Looks like the container didn't map the ports. There is no network assigned. I don't know how to fix it. EDIT: I just added a port to container and it works.

Hi, I can't connect to the server from the local network (thus not from outside), when I look in the log, I see that the server is running and ready. In minecraft game it says Can't connect to server. I have the port and IP correct.