FixYouDeveloper

Thanks for running the timely experiment!! Never run paritiy checks with write corrections as it doesn't know right from wrong? Instead use ZFS to correct bit corruption. Now I wonder if there's any reason for parity checks if we're running ZFS?... might as remove the parity drive. Speed diff between ZFS and Parity checks be moot (not worth discussing) if both takes <1 day for ~10-30TB of HDD data.

Ahhh.. I posted this in feature requests... can we please move this to General Support? https://forums.unraid.net/forum/55-general-support/

I have the wireguard port on my unraid server port-forwarded on the router. The server has two tunnels 'wg0' for clients and 'wg1' for docker containers. I can connect using "Remote tunneled access" on "wg0" which allows me to use my home IP for web browsing. However I want to route my laptop non private traffic to wg1 tunnel which connects to a service such as NordVPN. Is there a routing config that does this "Client - wg0 Tunnel to wg1 Tunnel" forwarding? I notice that if I use "VPN tunneled access for system" on wg1, I clients cannot access anything through wg0 anymore. so i've used "VPN tunneled access for docker" for now. Thanks

While I agree with this standpoint, the Wireguard ports on the server are exposed? It would be prudent to recheck if we need to bump priority of 2FA / 1FA later down the line. Apple Passkeys it's really cool - would love this system of auth. Just how exposed will unraid servers be in the future? Perhaps we would be looking at defending from compromised internal gateways such as Wireguard, IoT devices, etc.

Would also like this feature. `docker login unraidserverdomain.local` Response `x509: certificate signed by unknown authority` Luckily I could use localhost instead which skipped the ssl check. However all the docker pull / containers will need to use localhost JUST for the unraid server.

Thanks for creating the feature request thread. For those who stumble upon this thread. Please continue discussion on the feature request thread instead.

Any of the below would be a huge win to have on unraid! - 2FA: Time sensitive one time code - 2FA: WebAuthn Device Registration (multiple devices) - 1FA: WebAuthn Challenge Response Auth If we really wanted more security / beefy options https://www.truenas.com/docs/core/system/2fa/ TrueNAS is hard to beat atm. Unraid is decent for it's value - looking forward to the next update!

Hi google search guys! There's a discussion here that's more recent:

Looks like docker-compose is slowly creeping into unraid. Docker Compose Manager by: dcflachs WebGUI integration is not yet implemented.

is there a place we could vote for native docker compose support in the unraid UI?

@Reiject did you ever manage to fix this issue? I'm having similar problems - would love to know if it'll be better to move to freenas instead / buy a synology nas.

linux does allow usb slave.. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.16/driver-api/usb/gadget.htm I'm feeling this would be a really nice beta gadget feature - but probably not widely used enough to be stable.

A valid usecase these days is the 40Gps thunderbolt 3 connection (or 4) for an ssd only unraid array. 2026 coming around the corner - it's looking certain we'll see SSDs over taking HDD in terms of price. Of course - we can also look at more expensive fibre transceivers... Is there a way to emulate a tcp/ipv4 adapter over usb i wonder (most likely, but not ideal)