MAM59
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Currently
Viewing Topic: AooStar WTR Max Display Software Hilfe
Everything posted by MAM59
-
Going from two drives to four in a single parity system safely
right, but the risk that a drive will fail during the parity build is small. Also, you surely have a backup, dont you? (parity is NO substitute for a backup!)
-
Going from two drives to four in a single parity system safely
read my msg again, i have updated it
-
Going from two drives to four in a single parity system safely
no, if you set this, you cannot make new assignments, it will keep the old config then. actually it is stop array goto new config do NOT preserve current assinments (you could keep pools if you like, but NOT the array) put in new disks (the slots do not matter, so no need to move around all of them) make new assignments start array new parity will be generated automatically Be cautious not to assign old data drive as parity, else content would be lost. But in your case you have to pick one of the 12Tb drives as parity, they are empty, so it does not matter
-
Multiple NIC Setup for Management, VM, Docker
Why do people always try to make it complicated??? Throw away all that stuff and go with one, fast, NIC. There is no benefit from splitting the traffic apart, it only makes things more complicated and subject to fail. Go out, get a 100G card and thats all you will ever need. (ok, 40,25 or even 10G would do the same normally too already)
-
Static ip not working
You dont have a static IP if you have got it over DHCP. You may have a pseudo static IP if the DHCP server is configured to send out always the same IP if the request comes from a certain MAC, but that is not the same as "static ip". Ok, so far not helpful, I know :-) I guess your firewall/DHCP server has undergone some changes due to recent updates or something. He does not find the old assignment anymore, so he issues a new address (the old one is still in the tables, so it should complain about double assignments somewhere, check the logs)
-
[Plug-In] Community Applications
Firefox. as you can see from the 1st screenshot, there is no visible scrollbar until you hover over that region. Just make it 4 only, these will fit if you make them as small as on the other pages. And maybe consider to add a switch to the setting to turn off this totally uncessary "responsive and mobile" completely. Just add a "columes" setting so the user can set his own desired width.
-
Just curious about this warning (since decades already)
yeah, you are right, that "cache_dirs" scripts creates and launches an "at" command. It is used for waiting for the array to become online and then start checking it. I was not aware of this, just examined the script and saw it. The other message "9n5..." comes from my own script "addtofirefoxsettings", it just echos the found active profile for firefox to be edited. (harmless too) Too make it less mystic I have just changed the message to "Found Firefox Profile to edit under 9n35r0i1.default"
-
Just curious about this warning (since decades already)
you are asking ME, or somebody else? if ME: no. No at or cronjobs here in go.
-
[Plug-In] Community Applications
a few updates ago, the plugin got some cosmetic changes, which I find rather annoying: The start page now contains more icons that can fit onto the screen and add side scrolling rulers (not shown here, they appear if you hover below the first row of icons and "recent apps") This cuts off the rightmost icons, you have to know that 2 more are there and need to hit the scrollbar to see them. And because the scrollbar only shows up if you put the mouse over the right spot, it took me some time to find it at all. Anyway, it now takes ages to see the whole line And you need to repeat these steps for every single section that comes below This is really annoying and no help at all. Think of showing less items per section, make the boxes smaller or something else. Just get rid of these scrollbars please. btw: this only happens on the "home" page of the plugin. Every other page nicely only show 3 items per line and does not need side scrolling!
-
Unraid OS Version 7.2.1-rc.1 available
This restriction does not exist anymore on recent windows 11 versions. But of course, using FAT with such sizes is a waste of space because a cluster (the smallest disk part a file can use) grows ridiculously large. (exFAT does not make it better) But, as you can see, it works
-
Unraid OS Version 7.2.1-rc.1 available
you know that beta versions are only offered if you select manually the "next" version tab? You also have to acknowledge the disclaimer and log in to unraid.net. Only after these 3 things the update will be done.
-
Just curious about this warning (since decades already)
can't be. look at the screenshot first comes the error message, a few lines later "executing go script" Anyway you have pointed me into the correct direction, thanks. "go" was just a fix for an error an update produced long long ago. The "Dynamix System Temp" Plugin once detected the NCT6755 driver, which does not exist anymore. But on every reboot it wanted to load it. No Temps and no fans anymore. I've searched around and found the 6775 as the followup and added it to "go". To fix it, open the settings in system temp, and just click on "detect". It will find the new driver and update the stored value. (something that was missing at that UNRAID update long time ago) Msg gone, fans and temp working
-
Just curious about this warning (since decades already)
Any "solution" or "exlanation" for now ???
-
Unstable Unraid - forever waiting for a crash or shutdown
I see "time not synchronized" but no hint that it happens later somewhere ?!?!? No internet connection or missing/wrong ntp servers configured? Without a valid time many services wont function correctly or at all.
-
Destination Folder Access Denied - Windows 11 Pro
unlikely that the lan card change will help in any way. There is no SMB on the LAN card, its in higher Layers on top of it.
-
Destination Folder Access Denied - Windows 11 Pro
note that with recent windows versions Microsoft forced Signing to ON. You can turn it off (or to "if possible") again by editing the local security settings on the client. This is more or less just another try to force people to W11 and to Windows Server/Cloud.
-
Nginx Proxy Manager - "Internal Error" bei erstellen von SSL-Zertifikat - Was mache ich falsch? (Hardware: UniFi Dream Machine Pro, Domain)
das heist normalerweise: "kann den CNAMEN nicht auflösen/erreichen" Überprüf mal Deine DNS Einstellungen Was hast Du denn da für ein DNS / DYNDNS ? Oder.. MOMENT! Du kommst gar nicht zum Anlegen, sondern die Fehlermeldung erscheint SOFORT bei "Add Proxy Host" ?
-
Festplatte aus Array austauschen - ohne Array zu löschen.
Nö, aber das ist doch dann auch gar nicht so schlimm. Dauert nicht länger als der sowieso fällige Parity Check. Einziges Problem: während des Aufbaus sind die Festplatten "ungesichert". Wer dabei Angst hat, legt einfach die alte Parity Platte in die Ecke, macht ein rebuild (und dabei die Füße still halten, keine Daten löschen oder hinzufügen!!!) und wartet, bis er fertig ist. Sollte wirklich ein Fehler auftreten (seehr unwahrscheinlich, aber theoretisch möglich), die alte Parity Platte wieder rein und den Haken bei "Parity ist gültig" machen. Dann sich in Ruhe um das Problem kümmern.
-
Einbau von 10g NIC hat mir das Unraid zerschossen
Das klingt mir etwas nach "Hardware Kollision". Werf mal einen genauen Blick ins Manual Deines Motherboards, da stehen manchmal so böse Fußnoten drin wie "Wenn Sie diesen Slot benutzen, wird NVMe2 abgeschaltet". Es kann also recht gut sein, dass Du zwar einen freien Slot für die 10G Karte hast, diesen aber nicht benutzen darfst. Die Karte hat sicherlich den Bedarf für 4 Lanes, also kommen meist nur der GraKa Slot und sein Nachbar in Frage. Wobei bei einfachen Boards der "Nachbar" eben sehr häufig eingeschränkt ist.
-
Nginx Proxy Manager - "Internal Error" bei erstellen von SSL-Zertifikat - Was mache ich falsch? (Hardware: UniFi Dream Machine Pro, Domain)
aaaalso.... die besten (und stabilsten) Erfahrungen mit NPM hab ich im "host" modus gemacht, deshalb beziehen sich die folgenden Angaben nur auf diesen: VOR Installation von NPM bei Unraid unter "Settings->Management Access" die Ports 80 und 443 "freiräumen" (die UNRAID GUI wandert dadurch auf andere Ports) NPM installieren im Host Modus (DRINGEND empfohlen bei Einsatz einer FritzBox!, die verträgt keine multiple IP Adressen mit derselben MAC) Nun belegt NPM also die "normalen" Ports, nur so kann Letsencrypt ein Zertifikat ausstellen Fleissig Proxy Hosts einrichten (immer im DNS erstmal einen CNAMEN anlegen, dann den Host erzeugen, dann das Zertifikat anfordern) Bei den Hosts muss man aber aufpassen, "normale" hosts sind simpel Es gibt aber auch trickreichere Einträge: z.B: hier hat (und darf auch nicht) NPM KEIN Zertifikat, sondern reicht weiter an den Host, der sein eigenes schickt und überprüft. Es gibt auch reichlich "normale", die noch spezielle Zusatzkonfigurationen erfordern. Obacht bei Nextcloud usw!. Da muss man dann jeweils spezielle Anweisungen suchen und eintragen (Suche nach "reverse Proxy"). Meist wollen die noch spezielle Header übergeben haben. Bis alles läuft kann es schon ne Weile dauern...
-
Unraid server issue - HDDs getting very hot
I think your 2000rpm fans for the cases are too slow to suck in enough air through the small gaps between the disks. You should replace them with faster ones (that of course will be louder too, but not that much if you stick to nocturna or companies like be-quiet). Also the small fan on top of the case is essential! Hot air goes UP, it does not matter if your slots are open or the IO shield is missing, the hot air from the disks will never get there. It will be stuck at the top back of the cage and if it cannot get out there, there will be blocking thermal zone. Your front fans wont be able to suck in fresh cool air because of this block Fix that fan or just pull it out to allow wider escape. The other obvious help would be to use only every second slot in the cages leaving wider gaps for the air. But its clear nobody buys a 5 x cage to use only 3 slots out of it. But even then you could sometimes can help by more intelligently plugging in the disks. If you have SSDs or 2.5" drives, plug them between the 3.5" ones. This also will wider the gap for the air.
-
Bad Primary superblock, No valid secondary superblock
I see... I guess: This looks like to be the problem. The "unmountable" disks are only 16360 sectors in size, too small for xfs (or any other filesystem). Looks like already the partinioning failed. Strange I guess this is something for @jorge I can't help you with SAS drives and controllers, sorry.
-
Bad Primary superblock, No valid secondary superblock
did you also hit the "yes, I want to do this" Box??? pls retry and then post diagnostics afterwards
-
HDD activity light flashes once a second when at least one drive is spun down
It is totally normal that an OS has to check "disk health" now and then. Without this "hot pluggin" would not work. The OS itself has no influence if an LED flashes up or not. This is handled by the cage the disk is slept in. Some have activity LEDs, some not. And even not all of those who have them, also flash if certain check commands are send to the drive. The more intelligent ones do not I think. So, its your hardware you have to complain about, nothing to do for UNRAID... If these lights are too bright for you, cover them with some tape, that will dim them or even make them totally invisible. NB: part of the blinking also depends on the drive itself. You will find some that blink, some that are lit all the time and some that do not light up at all. I think, the most HDDs blink, the most SSDs are either "always on" or "not at all". But this optional feature is up to the manufaturer, the OS has no influence on this too.
-
make Multiple Addresses for IPV6 possible
The current implementation of IPV6 in UNRAID is "working" but far from beeing "correct". One badly missing feature is the use of multiple addresses concurrently. (yeah, you can enable privacy extensions, but that is not what I mean) The easiest thing to implement would be to allow SLAAC and/or DHCPV6 even if the setting currently is "static" This would allow additional routers to be accepted even there is a global "main address".