-
[PLUGIN] netatalk - AFP for UNRAID (Support Topic)
Is there a way that I can have this use Netatalk 2.2.4? I believe the most recent version is not compatible with the IIgs, at least not working for me using AFPBridge. Thank you!
-
Unbalanced Shows 4.5tb to move on a 4tb drive
Ahhh ZFS compression must be it. VMs are stored on my cache but either way I turned off docker and vms before doing the move. Thanks for the reply!
-
Unbalanced Shows 4.5tb to move on a 4tb drive
I made my array out of ZFS drives and am wanting to go back to XFS. Currently I’m transferring data off ZFS into XFS and using unbalanced. Last night I started the unbalanced move of the contents of my almost full 4tb drive onto a 6tb drive. I can’t say for certain since I have the memory of a fish but I’m pretty sure I didn’t notice the total being over 4tb last night. Checked on the progress just now and noticed it says 4.5 and I don’t understand how when I only selected data from one disk that’s 4tb. Any ideas?
-
NVMe cache pool getting slow write speed
Did not know about SLC prior to this, thank you! I will be shopping for different drives Is it safe to assume this is why the VMs were gettign poor speeds too?
-
NVMe cache pool getting slow write speed
Do you know what part of my device wouldn't be able to keep up? The drive on the server is rated for 1200MB/s write and it's connected via an x8 PCIe Gen3 lane, I see that ~1200MB/s write when doing the initial dd write test on Unraid (see original post) but not on the VMs or shares itself
-
-
NVMe cache pool getting slow write speed
With a disk share I get pretty much expected speeds via SMB transfer to the drive: Edit: I let it run a little longer and the speeds did not maintain: On my VM I am getting slow speeds still but I didn't change anything on where the VM disk is stored (should I have? I already have it stored under a cache only share so it should be on this disk share if I'm understanding correctly?): Also, is a disk share required to get the full speeds for some reason or was this just a test to make sure network/hardware is capable? I want to make sure I'm able to use my cache -> array share still
-
NVMe cache pool getting slow write speed
I have an HPE DL380 Gen9 server with 2 PCIe adapters for my NVMe drives There are 2x WD Blue SN570 1TB drives setup in a cache pool, using 1 for redundancy I was noticing that when transferring to my shares from Windows I was getting only around ~500 MB/s when it was NVMe -> NVMe transfer. Running iperf I saw that I was getting ~900MB/s connection so I knew that I should be getting more than 500 MB (not sure why it's not the full 10gig here but not my priority atm) I was unable to get the diskspeed docker container to work with my NVMe drive since it's active in a cache pool so I decided to run a dd speed test on one of my VMs and got the following result: When running dd from Unraid I get more than double the VM speed: Shouldn't my NVMe drives be working at full speed on the VMs and through my SMB shares? Here are the SMB share speeds I'm getting: Which seem to align more with the VM speeds for some reason Any insight as to why I'm not getting the full speeds via SMB share and VMs would be great, attached are diagnostics, thank you! diagnostics-20240227-2317.zip
-
DiskSpeed, hdd/ssd benchmarking (unRAID 6+), version 2.10.10
Having the same issue here, tried to follow the instructions on adding a path, drives are in pool
-
Unable to keep drives spun down
I unfortunately had to move to a high electricity cost area and am trying to find some ways of saving power. Currently my server has 12 3.5" hard drives in it but I was recently hit with a ransomware attack and decided to reset everything on my server so I'm down to only using 2 drives currently (parity and disk1, disk1 is about half full) I was originally having an issue not being able to get my drives to spin down at all but after installing the SAS spindown plugin and rebooting I was able to manually spin them down. I decided to spin down disks3-11 since they won't be in use for quite a while. I noticed that after a while some eventually spun back up when they shouldn't be in use. For context I have an HPE DL380 Gen9 that has a P440ar Controller with 4 SATA drives and 8 Hitachi HUS723030ALS640 SAS drives, all show as SAS in OS so I use SAS spindown plugin. If spindown won't keep the drives off for some reason the alternative option I was thinking was to remove each drive except for the current needed storage and a buffer drive for if i run over while not home. If changing the config is a simple thing to do since none of the other drives have data then I would be up for it but if it's possible I'd rather figure out the spindowns. Attached are diagnostics, thank you! diagnostics (2).zip
-
Spin down drives or rebuild array with lower amount of drives
Post removed
-
HPE iLO AMS service
Did you just install agentless management from HPE? When trying to install on my Windows Server VM it says "The software will not be installed on this system because the required hardware is not present in the system or the software/firmware doesn't apply to this system." Edit: Just read your post with more attention, did you install Windows server directly to the cache drive? Does unraid just not overwrite that data, or did you consume the cache drive for AMS?
-
[Deprecated] Linuxserver.io - Scrutiny
I'm trying to get Scrutiny running on my server, but only my cache drive is showing in the UI. I set each drive path in the docker config, am using the AnalogJ image. Anyone got any ideas?
-
Unable to turn off cache after removing drive
It does not, however the solution from here worked.
-
Unable to turn off cache after removing drive
Today I upgraded to a new server that doesn't have an NVMe slot. I ordered a PCIe card that hasn't arrived yet, but wanted to at least have my server running while waiting. Before I shut off the old server I moved everything off the cache drive, but forgot to disable them in shares. I built a new config and now they're greyed out and I'm unable to turn cache off. Any ideas how I could get this turned off?
-
Kernel panic - not suncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
After a long time of troubleshooting, I replaced the motherboard and RAM with no changes. Memtest was throwing errors for every stick of RAM I put in even on the new board, so decided to buy a replacement CPU. Memtest is passing with no errors and OS is working good now.
alexhoopes
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited