Nodiaque

So I just did a manual reboot from GUI. Right before, I ran a diagnostic just to be sure that diagnostic would finish. Well guess what, it's stuck. I can SSH in it no problem. syslog show it did a diagnostic, failed and tried to start nginx back (Why?) and then it's stuck syslog.txt edit: I tried calling a shutdown -r now, I lost my ssh session and cannot open a new one. 10 minutes have passed, I can still ping but that's it. I had to force shutdown. It's not normal. All docker where shutdown and vm also (I've checked with ssh and syslog shows it). I can't realy on something that cannot be shutdown when UPS is running, it's absurd servraid-diagnostics-20250924-2145.zip

Dam, it's brand new. I hate flash drive.... Thanks

Hello everyone, I just had a weird problem. I received a notification from my docker uptimekuma that my vm is down. Tried to ping, doesn't work. I tried to connect to my unraid gui, no answer. Weirdly, I can ping my server, I can reach any docker on either host, bridge or even those with static ip fine. I try ssh, connection refused. I forgot to try samba share. I decided to unplug and plug back network, total lost of communication to the server. Press power button, nothing happen. I had to hold to shutdown. I've taken a diagnostic and also taken my syslog logs. I see something weird in the log that I can't really tell what's the problem. I feel like my usb drive just stopped working? I hope not, it's brand new... servraid-diagnostics-20250905-2236.zip syslog-192.168.0.4.log

Hello, I suggest you go at the Github since this docker is not maintained by me. Sometime the owner does update that break stuff. I also updated the template sometime ago. I think I posted the changes either in the beginning or somewhere in the thread. I know there was a bug with cloudflare not long ago the owner created and fixed.

Hello, is it possible to run this docker as something else then root?

Is it possible to have mongodb run as another user and group? In unraid, we normally want every docker running on 99/100 but I can't find how to do this with this container

So right now, I can easily run diagnostic and restart. But I know that randomly, sooner or later, this is not true anymore. Weird thing is yesterday, I restarted 3 times before it decided to hang on the diagnostic. All of them where shutdown from the gui

I do have some docker that doesn't shutdown properly from the UI, AKA I receive an error message when I try to restart or stop them (but they do shutdown). Weirdly, using docker stop <container> shut them properly in a secondes, it's only through the GUI this happen. But also, diagnostic itself not working isn't new, I had that many times in the past.

Well I called a shutdown so normally it stopped the array. I looked at my log and everytime I call a shutdown, a diagnostic is done

ok so I bought another key and this one work. Now I'm stuck waiting for the new key in my email.... IS that suppose to be long?

why is it collecting a diagnostic on stop? Often, my server refuse to run a diagnostic and hang because of that....

Tested on my computer and it boot Server is a precision 5820

nop same error with stock install

Hello, I currently have a small 2gb flash drive that I would like to upgrade. The smallest I could find is a 128gb USB-A/C flash (it has both port) from Kingston. I backup my unraid flash using the ui, download the usb creator 1.0.1, selected the flash and flash it on my usb. I just tried booting it and I get an error saying /dev/sda1 doesn't exist during the boot sequence. I tried doing it the manual way and same thing.

Ok, so do I just reboot to finish the upgrade to 7.1.4 without nvidia driver, backup the flash and swap the usb or do I swap before finishing the 7.1.4 upgrade? I did manage to put 360mb space by deleting old package. I do have 800mb that I could get from the previous folder but unsure if it's wise to delete that folder before finishing the upgrade to 7.1.4

Hello, I have a quadro P4000 and I just ran the update from 7.0.1 to 7.1.4. I got two error: I haven't rebooted yet since the upgrade because of the error. I'm unsure what to do. Thank you edit: I think I found the problem but now, I'm unsure what to do. Still waiting for the reboot post upgrade, it seems my usb drive is full! I do have another usb drive that I bought about 6 months ago to replace it, never done it. Can I do it now while it's pending the reboot? What should I do?

Proton is simply a library on top of wine. Different approach and often make more problem then solve them. I run the standard version without any lag or anything, but I do have a beef of a server. The proton version was done cause there was rumor of performance improvement in the official forum but it's mostly placebo effect. If they release a native Linux version someday, it will be way better

Hello, I ran mover today cause one of my cache drive was getting full and was stunned to wait 1 hours before it reach that particular cache to move. I remember when looking at the log in the past that mover move 1 file at a time. I can understand why when we had a single cache and single parity pool. But now that we have multiple pool and cache, I though it would be nice to have parallel mover thread running. Easy way to do it would be to have a pool lock map. For exemple, in my system, I have: Array Cache AppData Cache Download download cache Cache move to array, array move to appdatacache (move appdata) and download cache move to cache. In that scenario, a simple lock table of 5 elements could be used, one for each pool. The first thread would be the cache to array which would lock cache and array pool. While lock, no thread can run on the locked one. So appdatacache won't run until array is unlock. But then, download cache to download can be run since it's using 2 unlocked pool. Thus, there would be 2 mover running while 1 job pending. I'm unsure if what I'm saying make sense or not, but that would greatly increase mover speed in a multi-pool scenario like mine. Thank you!

The in-game browser server list is very weird. It show like a top x number of server and that's it. It also filter by age. Sometime you see them, sometime you don't. In the end, it's all something I have no control over.

I don't see anything wrong in the log file. Might be the port forwarding that aren't taking in. You should be able to connect directly from your own pc to it using local network, this would remove the port forward issue. You could try the original wine version also, be sure to use a different appdata folder. There's no gain on the proton version

What do you see in your log file? Server can take time before appearing in the server list.

The value for use cloud flare bypass must be true if you don't have AA key. What is not needed is the scrapper docker. The current version of downloader have a cloud flare bypass include. If you check the information in the template, it says that if you put bypass off, it will use the AA donator key or the alternate url that you can put in another key. If you have neither of those, you must put the value to true. But the scrapper docker isn't needed. There's not even a value anymore used to point to it. Edit Also if cloud flare bypass isn't enable, you don't have a AA donator key nor alternative url, it by default tried zlib and a other website as alternative. These have way less stuff and you'll get often error.

I've updated the template and added a note to remove the cloudfare bypass scrapper docker. I also added the new variable now available for the docker

Unsure if it's the exact same but it's downloading: 2025-07-31 21:27:07,109 - backend - INFO - backend.py:68 - Book queued: The Ministry of Time 2025-07-31 21:27:09,878 - downloader - INFO - downloader.py:44 - GET: https://annas-archive.org/slow_download/a77823bd2ade21b4f83ba71a9c5eed3a/0/2 2025-07-31 21:27:09,923 - downloader - WARNING - downloader.py:64 - 403 detected for URL: https://annas-archive.org/slow_download/a77823bd2ade21b4f83ba71a9c5eed3a/0/2. Should retry using cloudflare bypass. 2025-07-31 21:27:09,924 - downloader - INFO - downloader.py:36 - GET Using Cloudflare Bypasser for: https://annas-archive.org/slow_download/a77823bd2ade21b4f83ba71a9c5eed3a/0/2 2025-07-31 21:27:09,924 - cloudflare_bypasser - INFO - cloudflare_bypasser.py:162 - SB_GET: https://annas-archive.org/slow_download/a77823bd2ade21b4f83ba71a9c5eed3a/0/2 2025-07-31 21:27:09,924 - cloudflare_bypasser - INFO - cloudflare_bypasser.py:198 - Getting driver... 2025-07-31 21:27:10,118 - cloudflare_bypasser - INFO - cloudflare_bypasser.py:204 - Display started 2025-07-31 21:27:31,401 - cloudflare_bypasser - INFO - cloudflare_bypasser.py:97 - Bypass attempt 1 / 3 2025-07-31 21:27:31,402 - cloudflare_bypasser - INFO - cloudflare_bypasser.py:102 - Waiting 0s before trying... 2025-07-31 21:27:38,925 - cloudflare_bypasser - INFO - cloudflare_bypasser.py:168 - Bypass successful. 2025-07-31 21:27:38,961 - book_manager - INFO - book_manager.py:331 - Downloading The Ministry of Time from https://momot.rs/d3/y/1754018857/10000/g3/zlib3_files/20240807/annas_archive_data__aacid__zlib3_files__20240807T222128Z--20240807T222129Z/aacid__zlib3_files__20240807T222128Z__28542083__4D4gwcaVXYxTRSiiGMLpgs~/qflLY91fU_cVO-gp9oMYOw/The%20Ministry%20of%20Time%20--%20Kaliane%20Bradley%20--%202024%20--%20Avid%20Reader%20Press%20%2F%20Simon%20%26%20Schuster%20--%20a77823bd2ade21b4f83ba71a9c5eed3a%20--%20Anna%E2%80%99s%20Archive.epub 2025-07-31 21:27:38,961 - downloader - INFO - downloader.py:84 - Downloading from: https://momot.rs/d3/y/1754018857/10000/g3/zlib3_files/20240807/annas_archive_data__aacid__zlib3_files__20240807T222128Z--20240807T222129Z/aacid__zlib3_files__20240807T222128Z__28542083__4D4gwcaVXYxTRSiiGMLpgs~/qflLY91fU_cVO-gp9oMYOw/The%20Ministry%20of%20Time%20--%20Kaliane%20Bradley%20--%202024%20--%20Avid%20Reader%20Press%20%2F%20Simon%20%26%20Schuster%20--%20a77823bd2ade21b4f83ba71a9c5eed3a%20--%20Anna%E2%80%99s%20Archive.epub Downloading: 65%|██████▍ | 2.91M/4.51M [01:18<00:42, 37.2kB/s] I'm checking the original project. The bypass is now built-in. I still have the CLOUDFLARE_PROXY_URL set and USE_CF_BYPASS to true. If USE_CF_BYPASS: is set to false, it will use alternative address (for when you are member of AA). I'll check the new config and update my template. Also, I'll remove the scrapper docker which isn't needed anymore (mine is offline currently and download work no problem)

Hello everyone, I currently have warning in my unifi controller that multiple device have same ip address. This is because of the vhost and ip used by docker and unraid. From what I'm reading, using ipvlan would solve this issue but I'm unsure what pro and cons this will do. I currently have multiple vlan through 2 NIC and a custom docker network. I have multiple device with fixed ip on specific docker network. Here's my docker network list: NETWORK ID NAME DRIVER SCOPE 32c74dc9aff8 bridge bridge local e7e41275fb7c eth0 macvlan local c097b48f0d65 eth0.1 macvlan local 7dbdd8d58774 eth0.2 macvlan local aa635793a94a eth0.10 macvlan local dc17271446e3 eth0.20 macvlan local 86f378f0b247 eth1.50 macvlan local 13172a8ebe7e eth1.100 macvlan local f3bfc19603bb host host local dc5700572b78 my-bridge bridge local 519a8c2b1b3b none null local Let's say tomorrow, I stop docker and flip to ipvlan. What change would it do? Thank you!