daithi

Dang I was hoping that would be the solution. I have two instances of radarr for 4k and HD movies. Basically I'm getting 4 orphans a month and I forgot to delete them for a while. Going one by one in the ui is annoying because it scrolls to the top each time. Could run -prune in the cli but I have a few stopped containers that I'm not ready to get rid of.

When I go to the docker page and enable advanced view I have a lot of Orphaned images. I believe this happens when updating a docker image that has 2 (or more) images. Am I understanding it correctly that adding all these apps to a group stop these orphan images from appearing?

Ok thanks

Just noticed the changelog for Dynamix System Stats and System information both say: Migrate repository to Unraid Does this mean these plugins are part of stock unraid now and I should remove/uninstall them? If so what unraid version does that come into effect?

This worked

I installed OpenBooks yesterday from CA. It's listed as grtgbln's Repository, I'm not sure if this is a different template? Anyway, I was having an issue, after searching I would get several messages, something like "Search Submitted", "31 Results Found" and then nothing. Just a spinning circle. Checking the logs would show an error, something along the lines of: open /books/books/SearchOok_results_for__BOOKNAMEHERE.txt.zip.temp: no such file or directory It seems to be fixed by changing the Container Patch from /books to /books/books

Trying to update the plugin, getting the following error: 6.12.15, Unraid Patch installed and latest patches applied. @NoBigCat further up in the thread has suggested updating to 7.0.0 and then 7.0.1, anyone else having this issue and found any other solutions? A little gun shy updating to 7.

Why is setting a timezone necessary for CWA? I haven't needed that in any other container.

Just tried to update the plugin and got the error: Couldn't create socket: [2] No such file or directoryChecking cron succeeded! I've been busy recently and my server has been running fine so I haven't looked at it in weeks. This is possibly a new error, or it could have been going on for a while. Just had a power blip and everything shut down (I really need to get a UPS). When I fired it up I figured I might as well update my plugins manually (usually everything updates as part of appdata backup)

Damn I think this is what happened to me. I've checked old backups and the ones that threw an error this week never had a tar.gz in the backup location. I just never noticed because I never got a notification (which I did after you made the change).

I think the same thing has happened to you as what I posted on Thursday. I haven't had a chance to do much digging, but I had a quick scan and some of my failed containers are at /mnt/cache/appdata whereas some of my successful containers are at /mnt/user/appdata. I need to clean them up before Wednesday night (next scheduled backup) and see if that makes a difference.

Last night I got an error on 4 of my containers (about 1/4). Have never seen this error before: [21.02.2024 23:31:24][ℹ️][recyclarr] Stopping recyclarr... done! (took 0 seconds) [21.02.2024 23:31:24][ℹ️][recyclarr] Should NOT backup external volumes, sanitizing them... [21.02.2024 23:31:24][⚠️][recyclarr] recyclarr does not have any volume to back up! Skipping. Please consider ignoring this container. [21.02.2024 23:31:25][ℹ️][recyclarr] Starting recyclarr... (try #1) done! ... [21.02.2024 23:41:26][ℹ️][Dozzle] No stopping needed for Dozzle: Not started! [21.02.2024 23:41:26][ℹ️][Dozzle] Should NOT backup external volumes, sanitizing them... [21.02.2024 23:41:26][⚠️][Dozzle] Dozzle does not have any volume to back up! Skipping. Please consider ignoring this container. [21.02.2024 23:41:27][ℹ️][Dozzle] Installing planned update for Dozzle... [21.02.2024 23:41:31][ℹ️][Dozzle] Starting Dozzle is being ignored, because it was not started before (or should not be started). ... [21.02.2024 23:42:23][ℹ️][jellyfin] Stopping jellyfin... done! (took 4 seconds) [21.02.2024 23:42:27][ℹ️][jellyfin] Should NOT backup external volumes, sanitizing them... [21.02.2024 23:42:27][⚠️][jellyfin] jellyfin does not have any volume to back up! Skipping. Please consider ignoring this container. [21.02.2024 23:42:27][ℹ️][jellyfin] Installing planned update for jellyfin... [21.02.2024 23:42:42][ℹ️][jellyfin] Starting jellyfin... (try #1) done! ... [21.02.2024 23:42:44][ℹ️][netdata] Stopping netdata... done! (took 2 seconds) [21.02.2024 23:42:46][ℹ️][netdata] Should NOT backup external volumes, sanitizing them... [21.02.2024 23:42:46][⚠️][netdata] netdata does not have any volume to back up! Skipping. Please consider ignoring this container. [21.02.2024 23:42:46][ℹ️][netdata] Installing planned update for netdata... [21.02.2024 23:42:57][ℹ️][netdata] Starting netdata... (try #1) done! All my other containers backed up fine without error. (Dozzle is not running, I haven't got around to fixing it since they changed the user format in the container)

Unless certain parts of the OS can be decoupled from the rest, I can't see how security updates would be pushed to people who's "Upgrade License" has expired. LT aren't going to maintain every single point release so they can push a bugfix to every Tom on 6.12.6, Dick on 6.12.8 and Harry on 7.0.1 We've seen Google do this with Android, where your Play Services or WebView can be updated through the Play Store without the Hardware OEM pushing a OS update. That has taken them years (and you could argue it's still a work in progress). And as for community developed plugins... I think it's a little unreasonable to expect volunteers to keep old versions alive. Nobody is making plugins for Photoshop 5 or Fruity Loops 12 either.

All due respect but are you willingly just ignoring the actual issues people are talking about? "I don't understand the rootcause", "The code excerpt seems quite unconclusive", "I don't see any proofs or even hints of that" The code that has been dug up literally says: "Pay your annual fee to continue receiving OS updates.": "Pay your annual fee to continue receiving OS updates.", "Your license key's OS update eligibility has expired. Please renew your license key to enable updates released after your expiration date.": "Get a Lifetime Key": "Get a Lifetime Key", "Key ineligible for future releases": "Key ineligible for future releases", People are worried that Limetech, like many other tech businesses, are going to try and pull the rug out from under them. There's a line in there that says "Get a Lifetime Key" and that has me hopeful that maybe it's all being blown out of proportion, but they need to communicate this better. What if they try and pull some bullshit like "your lifetime was for the lifetime of 6.x, now you need a "new lifetime" for 7.x? Yes 6.x has been around for a long, long time (2015 I believe). But who's to say that 7.x will last that long? What if I buy a "new lifetime" for 7.x in 2024 and then 8.x arrives in 2025? Being a holiday in the States and half of Canada, I'm not expecting any official input today. So this is probably going to stew and get even more toxic before they weigh in on anything.

I'll check it out thanks I don't think it will come at a lower price, and I'm fine with that. They would be maintaining 2 release channels it's not exactly a cost cutting opportunity.