theone

The PCH chip is maybe mapped to more then one PCI device. Because according to the board block diagram there are no other USB controllers.

After reading Intel® C222 Express PCH datasheet, it seems that the xHCI controller supports 14 USB 2.0 ports of which 6 can be USB 3.0 (In addtion there are 2 EHCI controllers). See section 5.21 of http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/8-series-chipset-pch-datasheet.pdf I am now thinking that SuperMicro connected all USB ports (2.0 and 3.0) to the xHCI controller - meaning that it cannot be passed-through as a whole.

I ran readlink on all usb devices Tower login: root Linux 4.1.17-unRAID. root@Tower:~# readlink /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb1 ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1 root@Tower:~# readlink /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb2 ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb2 root@Tower:~# readlink /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb3 ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.0/usb3 root@Tower:~# readlink /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb4 ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.0/usb4 root@Tower:~# It seems that USB1 and USB2 are on the same PCI device 00:14.0 although one is USB2.0 and the other is USB 3.0. If so what are the other 2 USB devices (3 and 4)?

Did you ever get it working - did you understand why they are all reporting the same bus? I am having the same issue.

I will do it later on today when I get back home and post back. BobPhoenix, That is what is puzzling... all ports (internal USB 3.0, internal USB 2.0, external USB 2.0) are reporting back the same BUS 001 !

Has anyone done the mapping on a Supermicro X10SLL-F board? lspci 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB xHCI (rev 05) 00:1a.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB EHCI #2 (rev 05) 00:1d.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB EHCI #1 (rev 05) lsusb Bus 004 Device 002: ID 8087:8000 Intel Corp. Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 003 Device 002: ID 8087:8008 Intel Corp. Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 005: ID 0557:2419 ATEN International Co., Ltd Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0000:0001 Bus 001 Device 004: ID 051d:0002 American Power Conversion Uninterruptible Power Supply Bus 001 Device 002: ID 13fe:3100 Kingston Technology Company Inc. 2/4 GB stick Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub The board has: * 4 external USB 2.0 ports * 1 internal USB 3.0 port (type A) * 1 port internal usb 3.0 header * 2 port internal usb 2.0 header. When connecting a USB device (DOK) to the external USB 2.0 ports I get them all on BUS 001 but my boot disk which is connected to the internal USB 3.0 port is also on BUS 001. I do not have internal cables to USB headers so can't test all other ports. How can both USB 3.0 and USB 2.0 reside on the same controller? edit: I found and added an internal USB 2.0 header and still the test DOK is shown as USB 001 !!! Are all the motherboards' USB ports connected to the same controller?!

Just remember not to upgrade unRAID to a new version if it has a new kernel until I release/compile a new VirtualBox package, otherwise you will be still without VirtualBox until I do.

You need to install a webserver and phpvirtualbox.

Try running swapoff on this swapfile and then swapon again.

I have been running virtualbox for the past few 5 years (at least) and have not had it crash the webUI. I did have segfaults due to lack of memory. I am not running any Dockers. Your problem seems to be reappearing in the forum and might be due to docker issues. do you get the problem when running without Virtualbox? do you get the problem when running without Dockers?

I have compiled VirtualBox 5.0.14 compiled for new unRAID v6.1.8. Please wait for lainie to upload to download server.

Yes

I have compiled VirtualBox 5.0.14 compiled for new unRAID v6.1.7. Please wait for lainie to upload to download server.

I have compiled VirtualBox 5.0.12 compiled for new unRAID v6.1.7. Please wait for lainie to upload to download server.

FIRST_INSTALL_DATE is the 1st time the drive was seen in the array. RECENT_INSTALL_DATE is the last (most recent) time the drive was added to the array after it was not seen. For example, you add a drive then after some time yo remove it for some reason then decide to return it again - that will be the RECENT_INSTALL_DATE. If you install a drive but never take it out then these 2 dates will be the same.

Are you using XEN or KVM? You might not be able to use VirtualBox if you are also using one of these features.

Did you try restarting the server?

It is where some of the log files are kept. You can leave it where it is originally (flash drive) but that means there will be multiple writes to the flash drive and thus a chance of reducing its lifetime.

Do we need to have both plugins installed?

I have compiled Virtualbox 5.0.10 for new unRAID 6.1.4 (kernel veriosn 4.1.13). Please wait for it to be uploaded to the server by lainie... Enjoy

Yes

Did you install the webserver plugin? Did you download phpvirtualbox and extract it into the webserver folder?

I have compiled Virtualbox 5.0.8 for unRAID 6.1.3. Waiting for it to be uploaded to lainie's site. if you upgrade don't forget to to upgrade to the latest phpvirtualbox 5.x otherwise you won't be able to access the Virtualbox WEBUI. Also clear your browser's cache - I had to.

Have you tried the "share folders" option in virtualbox (from phpvirtualbox UI)? It grants direct access to unRAID folders not through your LAN network shares - you will get a "VBOXSRV" pseudo network device that is actually the host unRAID.

I am going to do some comparative benchmarking between Virtualbox 4 and 5. http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=43513.0 Please comment in the above thread