-
Weetbix M Milk started following Out Of Memory errors detected on your server and [Support] FoxxMD - endlessh-go
-
[Support] FoxxMD - endlessh-go
This is an awesome project, I deployed it about 2 days ago and am already getting results. Is there a way to report the offending IP addresses so they can be added to a database like CrowdSec?
-
Out Of Memory errors detected on your server
I'd like to confirm that setting the transcode location to a disk was the solution. I followed the Frigate guide precisely and still had these issues. I would encourage anyone to use a VM for it or get a separate machine, I have ordered one now since discovering this issue.
-
Out Of Memory errors detected on your server
Thank you for the reply. I add these Extra Parameters onto each container, "--memory=8g --cpus=4 --memory-swap=-1 --restart=unless-stopped". For Frigate in particular I use, "--shm-size=256m --mount type=tmpfs,target=/tmp/cache,tmpfs-size=1000000000 --runtime=nvidia --memory=8G --cpus=4 --restart=unless-stopped". Is there a reason these arguments are not working?
-
Out Of Memory errors detected on your server
Hi guys, As per suggestion in and the "Fix Common Problems" plugin, I am receiving the "Out Of Memory errors detected on your server" message. I am attaching my Diagnostics file to this post. Happy to answer any/all questions. weetbix-server-diagnostics-20250420-1220.zip
-
[SUPPORT] blakeblackshear - Frigate
Hi guys, I am attempting to extend the login token given to the use as it annoys my partner having to sign in every few days. I am guessing this is done by adding a JWT environment command. Can anyone confirm this? Ideally a sign-in prompt once per week or month is better.
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
Separate question: The is little/no documentation on "/shared" and "binhex-shared". Can we use this to tie multiple binhex-qbittorentVPN containers to the same VPN connection?
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
I updated my 4 containers from qBit 4.5 today to :latest. I've recreated my containers from scratch, settings are copied exactly from a template so each container is identical, ports and WebUIs have been changed for each container. Any combination of 2 containers can be run at the same time with functional WebUI, but the 3rd and 4th instances will hang on "[info] Waiting for qBittorrent process to start listening on port XXXX..." Has anyone encountered this?
-
[Support] binhex - qBittorrentVPN
Hi Binhex and Community, I am looking for a suggestion or solution for the following use case. There are 4 binhex - qBittorrentVPN containers running on my Unraid Instance. This is because I create a new container for every 10,000 .torrent files. No containers currently use Privoxy, Microsocks or a VPN file as I only torrent legal content and files. Each container has it's own external port forwarded in the router. If I do decide to implement Privoxy, Microsocks and a VPN, what is the best way to do this for all containers? Can I point them all at a single Privoxy and Microsocks instance, or should I run a different set in each binhex - qBittorrentVPN container? Also, do Privoxy and Microsocks provide any extra benefits when using .torrent files from reputable sources and not having a SOCKS proxy provided by my VPN company?