Lilly

Ah, yeah, in that case I misunderstood what you said in the other post, thanks for the clarification! I do plan to stay with the same type of vdev inside of a given pool, but being able to set at least different vdev widths would honestly be great. ZFS is already pretty inflexible as-is, and this would at least give a decent amount more flexibility when it comes to expanding a pool. I'll create a feature request later today, thank you.

Hello, I have a ZFS Pool with a single vdev made out of 3x8TB drives in raidz1. Now, I have an additional 4 drives that I'd like to add to that existing pool as a new vdev, also in raidz1. After my first search, I found this post by a moderator about adding additional vdevs and how they have to be the same width (amount of disks): However, this info is wrong: After reading up some more I found contradicting info, and upon trying it myself, it worked perfectly fine when doing it manually in the terminal. The pool mounts perfectly fine, too. So I know ZFS can do this, and I tested around and also already managed to add the separate vdev to the pool using terminal: The issue now is, that the Unraid Web UI only lets me select "1 group of 7 devices" when I try to mount the pool like this - and it ends up saying the pool isn't mountable. Is there any way to work around this or is it planned to add this functionality (maybe in 6.13)? This pool I used for testing isn't my primary pool, but I'd love to add the 3x8TB HDDs to my main pool (which currently is made out of 5 disks) and it's kind of frustrating to be stopped by an Unraid limitation when the underlying file system clearly can do the job

Hello, would it be possible to add the functionality to use a dedicated IP bought from PIA for this container? Apparently someone posted a way to get the dedicated IP working with custom Wireguard config in a relevant issue on the PIA GitHub: https://github.com/pia-foss/manual-connections/issues/84#issuecomment-1055106327 Any possibility this could be integrated? And also, would you accept a pull request integrating this?