-
smb bad
okay i didnt realise this but my hardrive the folder im unziping was bottlenecking it afff i just switched some test movies from plex to my ssd and moved the whole folder and got the nice speeds i was hoping for!
-
smb bad
- smb bad
i disabled it for my eth0 and not my eth1 the eth1 is my 2.5 and the other is SUPPOSED to be but realtek, ill run the test rq- smb bad
i disabled bridging now i cant get into my gui- smb bad
whats the command for that?- smb bad
- smb bad
i seem to stay around this speed, im not unhappy with it but its not using my full 2.5 or even 2gbps- smb bad
oh i didnt know i had a bond let me try that- smb bad
so turns out steam was doing something i exited it and got better speeds on it but still kinda not the speeds i was expecting- smb bad
lunas-nas-diagnostics-20230811-1121.zip- smb bad
i forgot to say i also have 2.5gbe to my server- smb bad
i realize transfering the zip with windows is a bit faster than teracopy but still waaay slower than it should be, granted they are hardrives but they are decent segate irowolf prostherussianbadger started following smb bad- smb bad
i came from truenas wanting the ability to run more docker containers and apps easier and it has been so far, but the only issue is running zfs on here i get horrible speeds im transfering a zip file rn at 10mb/s the same set of drives in the same raidz1 config on truenas would hit 100 to 140mb/s idk if this is just an issue with my setup or not but its not clear whats the issue because when i first made the array i tested it with some movies and stuff with my plex media server and it did the 100-200mb/s which id like but for some reason i cant seem to hit it with most file types, im really hoping someone can help because i love the look and feel of unraid but would like not to switch back to truenas just because the storage performance is sooo slow - smb bad
therussianbadger
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited