steini84
-
Posts
434 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by steini84
-
-
Long way to go and mysql would not be ripped out right away.. If at all
-
I did that in virtualbox before i went with esxi. Just use the unraid virtualbox plugin, install ubuntu server and use the xbmc minified as a server guide on the xbmc forums.
-
Can't you run them one after the other? If I recall correctly it runs the test in the background
-
I rma as soon as i see some problems.. I would not trust the drive after some failures and would always have a bad feeling at the back of my mind
-
Can i achieve that with RDM?
I´m using the same motherboard and it´s working fine with a pass-through saslp-mv8 (after buying a new i5 processor with vt-d)
You can run the 5 disks via RDM but it´s a bit of a hassle.
Can i get Temperature and Smartreadings via RDM?
Not via RDM
Can i put my HDDs to sleep?
not via RDM
-
Yeah it will make virtualbox run headless and you can even start / stop vms from the plugin.
You will need to follow the installation here for your computer https://code.google.com/p/phpvirtualbox/wiki/Installation
Then you need to edit the config file from this:
/* SOAP URL of vboxwebsrv (not phpVirtualBox's URL) */
var $location = 'http://127.0.0.1:18083/';
to the ip address of your unraid. So if you are running unraid on 192.168.1.100 you need to make it like this:
/* SOAP URL of vboxwebsrv (not phpVirtualBox's URL) */
var $location = 'http://192.168.1.100:18083/';
-
You could look into owncloud
-
My guess is that the mover is copying files from cache to the protected array. I would keep the setting files under /mnt/cache/.apps/ the dot makes mover ignore the folder.
Ps you can change the api key manually in sab, less hassle than in all other apps
-
You can run a webserver (apache for example) on your pc/laptop and run phpvirtualbox from there.
-
You can keep phpvirtualbox on your computer but in the config file you have to point to your unraid ip
-
I also use ubuntu server and moved the data dirs of all the apps to that. Then I just changed the config files a bit, but it was just a fun project. Its nice to run a stock unraid.. Dont really need to worry about that at all now
-
You would not. Just unassign as cache and rebuild the failed drive to it.
-
In the latest unraid 5 versions it matches it automatically so no stess there
-
Will do. Thanks
-
Strange did another nocorrect check and now it did not find any errors.
Strange
-
Thanks for the super quick reply
It´s a brand new drive so i´m in denial that it´s broken already. But If that is the case i´ll just have to RMA it
Are you talking about this line in the seek time (I´m no so great at reading these.)?
7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 060 060 030 Pre-fail Always - 1083621
But after the next nocorrect check finishes should I compare the errors and if they match I can just do a correcting par check?
Thanks again for the quick reply
-
Hey guys
I just added 2x 3tb drives to my array last month and now my first par check finished this morning.
I have 54 errors on disk 11 (sdj - one of the new drives) and got this from the par check "Last checked on Fri Mar 1 09:36:44 2013 UTC, finding 1 errors."
I have a couple of these in the log
Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: handle_stripe read error: 3444003880/10, count: 1 Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: md: disk11 read error
and then a chunk of these:
Mar 1 06:07:02 SERVER kernel: ata12.00: configured for UDMA/133 Mar 1 06:07:02 SERVER kernel: ata12: EH complete Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: ata12.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: ata12.00: irq_stat 0x40000001 Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: ata12.00: failed command: READ DMA EXT Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: ata12.00: cmd 25/00:e0:a0:50:47/00:03:cd:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 507904 in Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: res 51/40:00:e0:52:47/00:00:cd:00:00/00 Emask 0x9 (media error) Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: ata12.00: status: { DRDY ERR } Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: ata12.00: error: { UNC } Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: ata12.00: configured for UDMA/133 Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: sd 12:0:0:0: [sdj] Unhandled sense code Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: sd 12:0:0:0: [sdj] Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08 Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: sd 12:0:0:0: [sdj] Sense Key : 0x3 [current] [descriptor] Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: Descriptor sense data with sense descriptors (in hex): Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: 72 03 11 04 00 00 00 0c 00 0a 80 00 00 00 00 00 Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: cd 47 52 e0 Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: sd 12:0:0:0: [sdj] ASC=0x11 ASCQ=0x4 Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: sd 12:0:0:0: [sdj] CDB: cdb[0]=0x28: 28 00 cd 47 50 a0 00 03 e0 00 Mar 1 06:07:05 SERVER kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdj, sector 3444003552
A smart check of the drive can be found here: http://pastebin.com/epHRRsg9
What should my next steps be? I have started another par check and hopefully this was just a one off
It´s a new drive and even though it passed the smart check, I dont see anything too suspicious like bad blocks.
Looking forward to hearing what you guys think.
-
-
Type: mysql -u {user} -p
-
I will take the other AOC-SASLP-MV8 card. PM sent
-
Sorry guys, but one more question:
I decided to update:
ASRock B75 Pro3
Core i3-2120 SB (3,3ghz)
8gb ddr3 memory
I'm getting a par check of 30-40 MB/s on the slow pci sata card (3 drives) so that is ok for the moment.. but I want to get a proper card with 8 connections.
I will be ordering online so is the SASLP-MV8 still the best bet or should I go for the LSI ones?
Thanks for your input.
-
I have gotten a better psu so I will sleep better at night and the disk rebuild went fine.
The motherboard + cpu + memory combo are doing fine and the mb has a x4 PCI Express slot.
Should I order AOC-SASLP-MV8 or am I mistaken that they are still among the best choices?
Found out that it only works as x2
Back to the drawing board
-
Thanks for the answers, a lot to think about
I actually only have one sata card, but the 8 sata ports are split up in two groups on the motherboard. I bought a SIL card since i had a SIL sata controller on the motherboard.
-
Thanks for the great update !!
You are right that tunneling the whole subnet is a bit of a risk, but IMO better than missing some ip addresses and taking the time to figure out exactly what ip addresses are part of the website.
Solved: Array reports unformatted drive
in Storage Devices and Controllers
Posted
Can you mount the drive via the commandline?