Jump to content

JorgeB

Moderators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    67,416

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    705

 Content Type 

Everything posted by JorgeB

  1. JorgeB
  2. JorgeB
    Difficult to guess what happened, would need diags from that time, but make sure you always have an up do date backup of libvirt.img
  3. JorgeB
    That confirms it's a network problem it working below 100Mbits
  4. JorgeB
    The libvirt.img, you wrote above that you restored it before so I assumed you have a backup.
  5. JorgeB
    There are no writes to any disk when the diags were saved, maybe it was still being cached to RAM, you can do a network test with iperf.
  6. JorgeB
    Now it's a different issue than before, the image is corrupt: Mar 25 11:14:57 CrusherJoe kernel: BTRFS error (device loop3): bad tree block start, want 30408704 have 0 Restore from backup then boot again is safe mode.
  7. JorgeB
    Yes.
  8. JorgeB
    No, licenses are tied to the USB flash drive.
  9. JorgeB
    Yes, safe mode
  10. JorgeB
    Do you have something restarting the service? Like mentioned it starts correctly at first array start, try booting in safe mode.
  11. JorgeB
    No, rebuild the disk, and recommend replacing the SATA cable first.
  12. JorgeB
    No, open browser windows in the GUI. https://forums.unraid.net/topic/46802-faq-for-unraid-v6/?do=findComment&comment=545988
  13. JorgeB
    Just a warning that this can be a little risky for the rebuild, if there are errors on another disk and you let it finish.
  14. JorgeB
    That's expected, once a disk is disabled it needs to be rebuilt. Disk looks fine, high number of CRC errors suggests a SATA cable problem, if you don't want to replace it at least swap with another disk to rule it out in case it gets disable again, then and since the emulated disk is mounting correctly you can rebuild on top.
  15. JorgeB
    Yes, that should be fine, though if you can get one from a more wll known brand, like SYBA/IO CREST https://www.sybausa.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=1027
  16. JorgeB
    Syslog is flooded with wrong csrf token errors, this means there's are multiple open browser windows, close them all and reboot, then post new diags after there are problems again.
  17. JorgeB
    Look for a JMB585 5 port SATA controller, it's PCIe x4 so you'll need to use the x16 slot, that's fine unless you need it for something else.
  18. JorgeB
    Perfectly fine to use the onboard ports, Intel SATA controllers are one best and most reliable controllers.
  19. JorgeB
    It appears to be starting correctly at array start, it then failed to restart, rebooting should fix that.
  20. JorgeB
    Upgrade to v6.9-beta1
  21. JorgeB
    Disk3 dropped offline, most likely a power/connection problem, but since it dropped there's no SMART report, you should cancel the parity check, check/replace cables and post new diags so we can check SMART.
  22. JorgeB
    You can get better speeds if all array devices are in RAID0, just having parity it's not really worth it IMHO, also like mentioned SATA fakeRAID won't work for that. I have a small server where each array device (including parity) is a RAID0 of 2 disks on an LSI 9240, you can also use any LSI 9211 or similar flashed to raid mode, but note that those are limited to two raids groups max, only megaRAID controllers like the 9240 or above support more.
  23. JorgeB
    There haven been similar errors on both cache devices: Mar 14 19:45:59 Gravity kernel: BTRFS info (device sdd1): bdev /dev/sdd1 errs: wr 428, rd 482, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 Mar 14 19:45:59 Gravity kernel: BTRFS info (device sdd1): bdev /dev/sdc1 errs: wr 295, rd 293, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0 Possibly there's a cable/connection problem on both, like for example if they share a SATA splitter, that or some compatibility issue with that model, but that would be strange. Also see here for better cache pool monitoring.
  24. JorgeB
    Difficult to guess where the problem is with those symptoms, you'll need to swap some hardware around. This usually takes a few seconds.
  25. JorgeB
    Only the parity disk would be written to, but just check "parity is already valid" before starting the array and everything will be good, including parity, assuming it was valid before.
×
×
  • Create New...