spylex

Members
  • Posts

    391
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by spylex

  1. I would also like to know this, especially point #2.
  2. Good lord, high price but look at these specs for an mATX board: http://www.asrockrack.com/general/productdetail.asp?Model=EPC612D4U-2T8R#Specifications Sibling with no 10gbps: http://www.asrockrack.com/general/productdetail.asp?Model=EPC612D4U-8R#Specifications Total of 16 drives from one mobo, can fit a nice GFX card here for your vitualisation needs... Throw in an E5-2603v3 in there and you're golden. Thoughts, for the wealthy unRAIDer? http://www.scan.co.uk/products/asrock-epc612d4u-2t8r-intel-c612-s2011-3-ddr4-pcie-30-(x16)-sata-iii-sas-12gbps-d-sub-(vga)-uatx-mot
  3. I might give the 8 bay one a go, it's pricey but probably the most appropriate at this point. As an HTPC + unRAID combo case, it's ideal, especially now that we have virtualisation support. http://www.xcase.co.uk/home-server-pc-cases/d-380hn-t-3u-compact-8x3-5-trayless-hotswap-rackmount-or-htpc-169-00-x-case.html
  4. This is amazing work from everyone and i look forward to trying it! For us wanting to live on the bleeding edge, is there an easy way to switch to unstable builds?
  5. I will agree, i have built 3 on the Q25B... and the Q26 is looking like an awesome one too. I am looking for a tower/desktop case that will take a mATX mobo (as opposed to ITX) and has those fancy pull out drives.
  6. This would be useful to know before upgrading as well If Limetech use this motherboard in their builds hopefully we'll get some insight?
  7. ironicbadger im also in the UK and looking for a case like this, or a tower one. Have you found anything else?
  8. Would have a TVHeadend one, but we still need VT-d to pass the cards to a docker, correct?
  9. Anandtech has done a review here: http://www.anandtech.com/show/7970/asrock-rack-c2750d4i-review-a-storage-motherboard-with-management
  10. Great news, here is the original thread: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=27800.0 I can say that ESXi does not let me pass through the second PCIE slot for some reason. I have a DVB card in there, doesn't even see it.
  11. @BobPhoenix, thanks for taking the time. I will try the card in another PC tomorrow. Very unfortunate as this hampers my dreams of the ultimate all-in-one server
  12. I had to open my mouth... Just plugged a TV card into the x8 (x4) PCIe slot and i can't seem to be able to passthrough in ESXI. Any advice? This is all i see. I have a card in the x16 (x8) slot already... According to the manual, the PCH (Lynx Point) should support this PCIe slot.
  13. Been on since the day i bought it. Both NICs working fine!
  14. Please drop AFP and NFSv3, they create so many problems it is just unbelievable!
  15. Great work, thank you. As other users have also mentioned, bringing all the important linux packages up to date will be amazing!
  16. 5 download failures in a row, 6th worked fine. It just downloads between 50-80% and assumes complete.
  17. Sweet! I've had trouble with permissions in my 'jail' with saving userstats, just a heads up!
  18. As long as there is a backup, seems like a fair option. Can always ask github themselves.
  19. You'll need a 100 line MySQL query to apply this.
  20. These dependencies and discrepancies amongst plugins are out of control... >.< I'm going a standalone install of glftpd in a VM this weekend to see how it goes.
  21. For best support of btrfs I need to update the base slackware platform and linux kernel. unRaid 5.x is based on slack 13.1 (which is pretty old now), and unRaid 6 is based on slack 14.1 (which has just been released). Turns out it's a fairly extensive job to upgrade the slackware platform, so this is what I want to do: - Release 5.0.1, which is primarily a bug fix release. - Freeze 5.x feature set and linux kernel at 3.9.11 (which is end of road for that kernel anyway). - Release 6.0, which is 64-bit kernel and slackware 14.1 platform (all 64-bit). When 6.0 is ready, I want to try and gauge how many users out there either can't run the 64-bit kernel, or experience big issues due to 64-bit kernel for some reason. If "not many" users are negatively affected then: - Add new features such as cache pool only to 6.x series. If "many" customers can not run 64-bit, then I will be forced to go back and update 5.0 platform to slack 14.1. I'm hoping I won't need to do that. This is fair. However, as other companies do, you could keep both 5.x and 6.x running at the same time, in different price brackets and feature brackets. If you want to run unRAID on old hardware that doesn't support 64bit, you should still be able to get a stable build of unRAID. 5.x is your choice until you upgrade your hardware. If you want the latest features and you've got the hardware for it, 6.x onward is your best bet. As long as both are stable, and both support the now independent webGUI, i think you've got a win-win for both yourself and the community. Trying to appease everyone with a single build might not work!
  22. Mate, this is amazing! Just proftpd is not really good at reporting anything at this point... I think we'll be happier with glftpd. Plus it is what the scene uses
  23. @Madhouse you can check the PLGs you are installing if they are installing the wrong version. If you delete it and reboot, it might re-appear if another plugin wants to download and install it.