leech

That fixed it for me its so easy to oversee/forget... Added all the variables to docker containers an enabled nvenc in tdarr node but still tdarr not working with gpu. Added NVENC H265 Plugin and now it works. I have one question. How to prioritize GPU Over CPU Usage? I trieb placing nvenc plugin on top of normal CPU plugin, but tdarr still starting with cpu encode until 2 threads are full, then moving on starting threads on GPU. I'd like to transcode with GPU first and if there is no more threads left fall back on CPU.

Update i have found something interesting. When i pin the Tdarr container to CPU 2-7 it runs on all them cpus But if i add CPU 0 or 1 then it only runs on CPU 0 or 1 and discards 2-7 Any Idea why this is happening? And can someone please move this thread to the Docker Engine forum.

Hi i have some problems with a docker container only using 2 from 8 available CPUs. I have installed Tdarr but it only uses 2 from 8 CPUs. I know i have messed with cpu pinning in the past because of other problems but it looks like currently there is no CPU pinning or isolation in place. I don't know if this is a problem from Unraid that is limiting the container to 2 cpus or from the app in the Docker container itself, please help. Is there any other place where i can limit the cpu usage for Docker? Thanks & Best regards.

Hi i want to replace my aging Supermicro Board with a new one and found this: Supermicro H11SSL-i R2.0 bulk (MBD-H11SSL-i-B-R2.0) I like this because i won't have to use extension cards anymore and i could connect all the disks directly on the mainboard. (with the possibility to add extension cards in the future if the number of disks increases) Or should i got with the (like it because of 10gbit LAN Ports): Supermicro H12SSL-NT retail (MBD-H12SSL-NT-O) Are there any known Problems with the Mini/Slim-SAS connection or something else? Best Regards

Found it! Somehow the default route went missing, added 0.0.0.0/0 + GW and now it's working again

Hm 10gbit is working now but Docker isn't anymore. the Containers i have are working but i can not add any new ones. Here an example when i try to install apache: root@localhost:# /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix.docker.manager/scripts/docker run -d --name='apache' --net='bridge' -e TZ="Europe/Berlin" -e HOST_OS="Unraid" -e 'PUID'='99' -e 'PGID'='100' -p '80:80/tcp' -p '443:443/tcp' -v '/mnt/user/appdata/apache':'/config':'rw' 'linuxserver/apache' Unable to find image 'linuxserver/apache:latest' locally docker: Error response from daemon: Get https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/: dial tcp 23.23.116.141:443: connect: network is unreachable. See 'docker run --help'. The command failed. Any Ideas why this happens? tower-syslog-20210323-1005.zip

Hi, i have a Problem with Unraid and 10gbit Ethernet. I installed 10gbit cards in both of my unraid servers. The cards are working and show 10gbit transferspeed in the dashboard. The old 1Gbit onboard ethernet port is still connected for failover reasons. When i now transfer data over the 10gbit interface i only get 1gbit speed (~125mb/s). This is as long as the 1gbit ethernet port is up. If i shut down the 1gbit port i can transfer with 10gbit speed on the 10gbit ethernet port (~500mb/s due to SATA 6gbit). I can reproduce this on both systems. (if 1gbit port is down, 10gbit is working, if i take the 1gbit ethernet port up 10gbit only works at 1gbit speed) For testing i connect by IP address so i can rule out that the wrong interface is used. What if i want to do loadbalancing between the ethernet ports? can i only use the speed of the slowest ethernet port? Is this wanted by design? BR

thanks for the info. Changed topic title to it.

any ideas on this?

Using unraid 6.1.7 Is there a way to prevent unraid from counting the free space of the cache disk to a cache disk enabled share? Because the problem responding from this i that users are showed that there are for example 3TB free space left on the share, when thats not the truth. Because there are ony 1TB left on the Array and 2TB on the Cache disk. If then users write 2TB of data. 1TB will not be written into the array when the mover starts because after 1TB of data there is no more space left in the array. And the data in the cache drive remains unprotected from disk failure.

"The network folder specified is currently mapped using a different user name and password" I now tried some time to find out what causes this problem in my system and if others got my constelation too, they should find the anwer here and not have to search like i am Problem: Windows keeps telling you that you can't connect to unraid share with private security with specified user because the share is already accessed by another user. But i don't had any network accesses onto the unraid shares from the windwos machine. Also "net use" doesn't show up anything and "net use * /delete" doesn't do the trick. I also rebooted serveral times, etc... after searching and trying for hours i found a little shortcut in my explorer which i have overseen the whole time. It was a library shortcut under my computer which pointed to a share on the unraid. deleted it and connecting with another user went fine. This is very easy to overlook! So if you aren't able to connect to your unraid shares with other users, have a look in your folder library. Or better, do not make shortcuts this way

i didn't find a solution only a workaround. I switched to Secure share export and created another user. with this user it works now so problem has to be with the nobody user.

I'm trying since hours to figure this out. problem is i mostly find topics where they got this problem with a windows server... Unraid 6.0.1 last reboot was 2 weeks ago. setup was working for months. then suddenly yesterday the mounted Unraid shares on a windows machines dropped. since reboot is the first solution to everything i rebootet unraid and windows was able to connect again. today i recognised that also the mount points on the debian machine dropped and now i try since hours to find a solution to the problem. when i try to mount the share i get sudo mount -t cifs -o username=nobody //192.168.1.105/stuff/ /stuff mount error(127): Key has expired every site on the web says thats an error when the password from the useraccount on the server has expired. so i had a look at the nobody account on the unraid server: root@Tower:~# chage -l nobody Last password change : Aug 03, 2010 Password expires : never Password inactive : never Account expires : never Minimum number of days between password change : 0 Maximum number of days between password change : 99999 Number of days of warning before password expires : 7 even it looks good i reset the password for the nobody account but still i get mount error(127): Key has expired i don't get it whats wrong since i haven't anything touched since days. only installed some docker plugings but thats was a week ago.

someone know any help? announcement thread wasn't helpfull...

hi folks i'm searching for a NFS Tutorial for latest Unraid 5b14. The Forum is full of posts regarding to NFS and Unraid 4.7 and everybody is refering to the FAQ http://lime-technology.com/wiki/index.php/FAQ#How_do_I_configure_NFS_mounts.3F But the FAQ is Outdated and for 4.7 and all the Menus, Boxes and Inputs look very different in 5b14. As an Example you don't even see the disc shares anymore under the Shares page. I can't find any guide oder Help on Unraid 5. so please can someone help me? I don't get it where to put the options like *(rw),no_root_squash and such... Or is it now that easy, that you switch on NFS and theres no need anymore for these options? I'd like to try out using Unraid as NFS Datastore for ESXi.

Hi I searched the forum and the wiki but i didn't find anything on this. Is it possible to make a hardware raid 0 for the parity drive? So i take a PCIe raid 0 controller and connect 2x 1TB HDD to it. Configure them in the controller BIOS as raid 0 and select the created drive as parity drive in the web interface of unraid. Then rebuild parity on it. This should speed up parity checks and the write speed of the system. I would like to do the same for the cache drive. But therefore i use 2x 250GB I think that should give a huge boost. I knew that raid 0 doubles the risk of failure but since one disc goes bad it's like i only got a normal disk in the array, i have to replace one drive and then recreate it. So it also could not compromise the system. Is there something that i miss in my consideration? Any point why the created hardware raid 0 discs shouldn't show up in unraid or couldn't be used anyhow? Also a 3TB raid 0 drive (with 2x 1,5TB) wouldn't be functional in Unraid 4.7? would it do in current Beta 5 ?

can't say cause i only got 1 drive on it currently. i'll check on speeds when i get the other 2 discs into the array then there will be 3 discs on the multiplier, that will tell how slow it will get.

Today i built in the new hardware. and what should i say, after figuring out that a power cord was broken, all bootet up just fine. Unraid recognises the AD2SA6GPX1 (2 Port Sata PCIe) and also the AD5SAPM (1x5 Port Multiplier) connected onto it. Harddiscs which are connected to it work fine. Currently at clearing status. Looks like it is proofed that this controller pairing is working. Maybe some Admin or Mod wants to add this to the Hardware Compatibility list cause there isn't much content about port multiplier and i think it would be a good information for all low cost system builder. Sure when i connect 10 Ports through a single Sata Interface then the result won't be a high performance Storage System. But for ppl like me, who need this system as Movie and TV Show Storage with almost only one maybe two concurrent sessions on it, it's way enough.

ok they suggest an AD2SA3GPX1 http://addonics.com/products/host_controller/adsa3gpx1.asp this is a 2 port sata controller with sil3132 chip i'll try and let you know.

i want to use this card because i already got addonics port multiplier cards (AD5SAPM) which i want to use on the controller for a total of 16 ports. i got enough free pci slots to use other cards or also i can use a 16 port card. But i don't want to buy a huge bunch of hardware when i already got the multiplier cards. All i need is a host controller which is compatibel with my port multipliers (AD5SAPM) http://addonics.com/products/host_controller/ad5sapm.asp But it seems that the sil3132 chipset is also supported. I'll ask addonics support if they can suggest me a controller with a sil3132 chip which is compatibel.

Hi folks i'm searching through the forum for information about Port Multiplier. I found some threads where i read that using of port multiplier works in general. My problem is that i didn't find a list of supported controllers. Also i couldn't find a statement if the Sil3124 will be working. I know much other SIL Chips are supported but nobody wrote about the 3124... I want to use the ADSA4R5 from Addonics. http://www.addonics.com/products/host_controller/adsa4r5.asp because i already got port multipliers from them and they told me to use this controller for the multipliers. So now i want to prevent buying the controller and then check thats it's not working. Since there are Linux drivers available is there a chance they will got integrated in a next unraid version if not already built in. I know that port multiplier aren't fast. I don't need the speed. I need the ports! So please don't start discussing how slow the system will be....

yeah it's slow, but better than nothing ^^ maybe i'll get a cheap gbit card but i think the currently setup will last for a while. I finally want to build a Pro Server with 20 drives, and therefore i need another mainboard anyhow... (or more expensive controller) Until then, HD movie streaming also works with 100mbit

Finally i changed the Hardware and it works again. This Mainboard is compatible: http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=G31M-S How to add this to the Compatiblity list? Cause this Board got a Realtek 8103EL/8102 Network Interface and until now this isn't listed in the list. I know it's only 100mbit. buts it's on the board and does it'S job until i get another. Also Seagate ST31500341AS Seagate ST380815AS Samsung HD204UI Harddisks are working.

i got a asrock mainboard with a core2duo. http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=G31M-S it's not on the supported list but there are asus mainboards with the same G31/ICH7 chipset. i'm not sure about the lan, but i'll put it together and plug on the flash drive and see if it's going to do it's work. what do you think?

Thanks for your Reply. Sorry but i didn't have build that System on my own. I bought it from a Retailer since i didn't want to build it myself. http://www.bettershopping.eu/de_AT/shop/PC_Hardware/NAS-Systeme/NAS-Gehaeuse/ART00927_NAS_Gehaeuse_MAREL_GreenIT_unRAID_6x3_5_Tower.html?currency=EUR until the System broke it runs fine for weeks without speed issue or something.... I bought this system cause i wanted to avoid Hardware problems.... and now this Ahm... this Syslog copy i made minutes after the problem occur. But anyhow, when the hardware isn't good overall i think i'll rebuild it by myself. I got an old HTPC with a core2duo and 1gig of ram (or maybe 2, but it's upgradeable) i think its an elitegroup or ASrock mainborad or something. Have to look if it's on the supported hardware list. I already thinked of an Hardware Upgrade cause the current Hardware couldn't take more than 6 drives...