JonathanM
-
Posts
16,802 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
66
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Report Comments posted by JonathanM
-
-
Yes, this is an issue. Obviously it's not a high priority one.
Rationale is that by default any multi drive pool IS protected, and it takes a deliberate action to change that, and if you select RAID0 or single, you will know that the pool no longer is protected.
It still needs to be fixed though.
-
-
That's a known issue, any RAID multi drive pool is shown as protected, regardless of RAID level.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Garbonzo said:
I thought I had read 6.11 was out of beta, but I may have misread that... anyway, I am probably going to sit revisiting rc5 out this time, and try again if there is a rc6+ prior to release.
-
1 hour ago, dopeytree said:
Unraid is full of bugs
To be fair, most of the issues we see here on the forums isn't technically limetech's software. In your AMD example, the best limetech can do is pick the least buggy version of the drivers provided. When they update to the latest driver from third parties, who knows how it will play out. If you document the issue and it's solvable by rolling back the AMD code, that's what will happen. Hopefully all these sorts of issues get caught early in the rc cycle and get ironed out of the full release.
-
1
-
-
Changed Status to Closed
Changed Priority to Other
-
-
-
-
12 hours ago, feraay said:
I guess would be a lot easier if we stop mixing problems with each other only because the outcome is the same
This sums up probably 95% of the me too posts in this whole forum, not just this thread.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Does it act the same on the release version 6.10.2?
Collect diagnostics after the shares are gone and post in the general support area, be sure to attach the diagnostics zip file. This is unlikely to be a bug.
-
-
2 minutes ago, dumurluk said:
I don't believe partitioning was ever a requirement when I set my servers up. The process was just format, label, unzip the files and run the make bootable script.
It was assumed the factory would put a single partition on the USB stick. This was valid for a large percentage of sticks, but some manufacturers tried to be cute and add partitions with various functions, like U3
-
I can't remember where I saw it, but at some point in the past I seem to remember that it wasn't always required to partition a flash drive, formatting the entire device without a partition defined is somewhat supported. How supported, depends on the implementation of the OS.
Perhaps looking for a valid FAT system on the /dev/sd? device itself as well as parsing the partitions?
-
In my opinion, the KVM hosted VNC should not be used for anything but operations that require local console on the VM. RDP, nomachine, pretty much any remote access hosted in the VM itself is going to give you a much better experience.
-
1 hour ago, ncoolidg said:
I know you should never do file operations between the two. Like copy a file from /user to /disk. Any other risks?
Nope. As long as you stay cognizant of the fact that a file will appear in two locations, and the computer isn't smart enough to keep you from overwriting (and subsequently erasing) what appears to be a second copy but isn't, you are fine.
In fact as long as you are careful and don't interact with the file's twin in the same operation, you can mix user and disk shares. *(shh, don't tell anyone)* It's just easier to make a blanket statement to never do it, because most people aren't careful enough or think through what seems to be a perfectly innocent operation that ends up nuking their data. Once you are thoroughly familiar with how user shares work and how disk shares are melded together to make the user shares it's pretty obvious what is and isn't ok to do.
-
11 minutes ago, msryhajw said:
Tested OK in Safe mode with GUI
Then one of your plugins is causing it. Remove 1/2 of the plugins, test, if it's ok add back 1/2 of the remaining. If it's still messed up, remove another 1/2 of the running plugins. Use logic to determine the culprit, then post in the specific plugins' thread that caused the issue.
-
The new font is perfect as far as I am concerned. I had my display set at 90% previously to get the look I wanted, now it's just right at 100%.
Hopefully it ticks all the boxes for everyone else, it's a keeper for me at least.
-
I don't think there is any intelligence applied, it just reads what the motherboard reports via DMI, so you would need to talk to your motherboard vendor about their BIOS reporting incorrect values.
-
Why, oh why, can't there be a technical multi-lingual font that uses the slash through the number? 0̸
It would seem to me that after over 50 years of communicating electronically we would figure this kind of stuff out.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, jimsefton said:
I tried upgrading from rc4 to rc5 but it detects one of my array drives, my cache drive and a spare drive as "wrong". When I select them from the list the array drive says it will be re-built. Not sure why this is so I rolled back to rc4 and it all works ok now.
need diagnostics from rc5.
-
Can you recreate in safe mode? There are so many plugins and modifications it's tough to say whether this is Unraid or one of the modifications causing it.
-
Would making the match fuzzier help or hurt? I get that it would be VERY BAD to get a false positive match, but is there anything you could do to make the false negatives less prevalent without introducing any false positives? Maybe parse the old device string for underscores, dashes, spaces, and only compare the alphanumeric strings between the separators? That way aaa - bbb and aaa__--__bbb would be detected as the same device?
-
Was the appdata backup running?
It shuts down the containers then restarts them when the backup is complete.
-
1
-
[6.11.5] MAC OS VM do not start
in Stable Releases
Posted
Please post in the proper area, this is not an Unraid bug.