monkeymajik

I seem to be having trouble with this version and the Opera Plex App in my TV. How can I point to a previous build of the limetech/PlexMediaServer docker/container?

No problems here - how did you invoke the reboot? After the upgrade had completed and it said reboot required I invoked it via the web gui. Reboot button, Yes I'm sure I want to do this.

Updated from 6.1.2 via plugin update check. However on reboot it detected an unclean shutdown and is now running a parity check. Other than that, array seems to be running well.

try to boot other OS from livecd(Ubuntu for example) to double check Of course, clever idea - Will try.

PCI NIC in and working at 1000mbit. Makes me wary of the condition of the rest of the board

The only way to verify that would be to try one of the PCI NICS. It looks like monkeymajik may be at the point of "absolutely have to" with a PCI NIC to isolate the issue. Agreed, will power down array now and try. The PCI NICs are a completely different chipset, so I'm fairly sure they will work fine. I was just hoping I could get the onboard working again with a different driver.

[quote name="mr-hexen" post="408672" timestamp="1442009373"] Whatever you've got it plugged into is not sayings its gigabit capable to the NIC. That's a red herring i'm pretty sure, as it was working at gigabit in that switch, other devices on the switch connect at gigabit and I even tried a completely different switch with the same result. For me it is not isolated to 6.1.2 I am fairly sure it was happening since the last 5 stable. I only noticed it after going to 6.1 and then 6.1.2

It used to connect at 1000mbit I have some spare PCI nics here, but I dont want to use them unless I absolutely have to.

Tried 3 different and known good Cat5e, Cat6 cables, tried different switch ports, have even tried a different switch

The kernel driver is included. What is your specific chip? RTL8111C 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 02) root@Silo:~# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0: Supported ports: [ TP MII ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full Supported pause frame use: No Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full Advertised pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Link partner advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full Link partner advertised pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only Link partner advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Speed: 100Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: MII PHYAD: 0 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: on Supports Wake-on: pumbg Wake-on: g Current message level: 0x00000033 (51) drv probe ifdown ifup Link detected: yes root@Silo:~# ethtool -i eth0 driver: r8169 version: 2.3LK-NAPI firmware-version: bus-info: 0000:04:00.0 supports-statistics: yes supports-test: no supports-eeprom-access: no supports-register-dump: yes supports-priv-flags: no root@Silo:~#

Would it be possible to include the kernel driver for Realtek r8169? The one in these releases only allows me to connect at 100mbit. Or if possible make the kernel driver available separately?

High-frick'n-fives all-round Dumped off to a 3tb usb disk. Cabling up the new config now. Thanks for all your advice bjp999. Believe it or not, I actually work in IT and some times you just spend all day on technical issues, that when you get home the last thing you want to do it look at a computer. Hence my skimming some of the posts A bit like how the builders house is never built/in a constant state of dis-repair. heh

Yes and Yes I want it to forget about disk5 though. I didnt not rebuild disk 5 onto a new 2TB disk. I ran the recovery against the simulated disk. Now I want to add 3 new disks that are samller than the old disk5.

The clarify the array is currently in maintenance mode.

May sound like a dumb question, but will running with the rebuild option again, after copying what it has found, out potentially find more data?

Okay finished. It says I should stop and start the array now. Do I do this and mount the disks (leave 5 unassigned the whole time) Files found: 7248 Directories found: 351 Files with fixed size: 1 Pass 3a (looking for lost dir/files): ####### Pass 3a (lost+found pass) ######### Looking for lost directories: Looking for lost files:7 /sec vpf-10680: The file [28836 30317] has the wrong block count in the StatData ( - corrected to (0) Flushing..finished Objects without names 18 Files linked to /lost+found 18 Pass 4 - finisheddone 481151, 187 /sec Deleted unreachable items 291 Flushing..finished Syncing..finished ########### reiserfsck finished at Fri May 16 06:31:08 2014 ########### root@Silo:~# After I have grabbed the files I want back (if possible) I want to remove disk 5 completely from the system and add 4 1tb drives. Do I follow the shrink my array procedure to do this?

Must have been wiped clean? root@Silo:~# reiserfsck --check /dev/md5 reiserfsck 3.6.21 (2009 www.namesys.com) ************************************************************* ** If you are using the latest reiserfsprogs and it fails ** ** please email bug reports to [email protected], ** ** providing as much information as possible -- your ** ** hardware, kernel, patches, settings, all reiserfsck ** ** messages (including version), the reiserfsck logfile, ** ** check the syslog file for any related information. ** ** If you would like advice on using this program, support ** ** is available for $25 at www.namesys.com/support.html. ** ************************************************************* Will read-only check consistency of the filesystem on /dev/md5 Will put log info to 'stdout' Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if you do):Yes ########### reiserfsck --check started at Wed May 14 20:15:07 2014 ########### Replaying journal: Done. Reiserfs journal '/dev/md5' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions replayed Checking internal tree.. finished Comparing bitmaps..finished Checking Semantic tree: finished No corruptions found There are on the filesystem: Leaves 1 Internal nodes 0 Directories 2 Other files 0 Data block pointers 0 (0 of them are zero) Safe links 0 ########### reiserfsck finished at Wed May 14 20:18:12 2014 ########### root@Silo:~#

You should be in maintenance mode and use the dev/md? device name where ? corresponds to the disk number. Ta, just to clarify, I want to run the check on the simulated disk, not the physical one. sdX? sdX1?

I laid out an option to run reiserfsck on the simulated disk with cons of this approach. Did you consider that? I would like to try this. What device name should be used and in what state does the array need to be in (maint mode, stopped, started) I am in a state currently where disk5 is being simulated, with the array started.

Sorry bjp999 in my haste i did not read properly. As I have several 1TB drives spare, I do no wish to purchase a new 2TB just for just this rebuild (if avoidable). I have a spare 3TB external USB drive. I know in older versions this was not supported, can I utilise this external drive for as a member disk temporarily to rebuild onto?

Thanks for all your help so far! disk5 has rebuilt - apparently without error. However there is nothing on it. See attached screenshot. Should I run a parity check as indicated in the screenshot or should I stop the array, remove the disk and see what it simulates?

it is attepmting to rebuild onto disk5 now. Once completed how do I go about running reiserfsck. (i'm on unraid 5.0.2)

I booted the server off different media (i.e. Unraid was not runing) and formatted the device using Maxtors low level format utility http://www.hiren.info/downloads/freeware-tools/maxtor-low-level-formatter - Not possible for me to have formatted the "simulated" disk5. If i physically remove disk5 now and start the array with the addition of some of these spare new 1tb's drives i have (smaller than the failed disk) will it still try and simulate disk5's data?

Shouldnt I be able to see what was originally on disk5 from parity and the remaining 4 disks? I dont recall running a parity check since having problems with the drive.

I powered down the array and reconnected disk5 with a new sata cable. Powered up and have attached smart report. I have not started the array. Drive looks sick. smart.txt