ucliker

Members
  • Posts

    174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ucliker

  1. 14 minutes ago, orhaN_utanG said:

     

    Sorry, just so I understand (absolute newbie here):

    If ZFS is not supported for arrays, there are no advantages over the status quo, correct? Apart from the fact that it is "officially" supported. You wouldn't benefit from the higher speeds and would only have the ZFS advantages (parity, snapshots, data integrity etc.) within the created pool, am I understanding correctly?

     

    If that is the case, why are people excited about it? Isn't that what you could do with the Plugin? Again: Not judging, genuinly trying to understand it. Would be happy about a ELI5 😄

    This is what I took away from this as well. I’m also assuming if ZFS is pools only that we would need to have disks in the standard array still? 

  2. On 3/22/2022 at 1:54 PM, freeridekid said:

    Hello

     

    I am considering upgrading my 10th gen cpu to an 11th gen, and I was curious about the current status of HW transcoding in Plex on 6.9.2

     

    Thanks

    I was just going to ask the same question. I just purchased a bunch of parts including a rocket lake cpu thinking this was fixed. 

  3. So basically I can't go wrong with either one? I have a TP-Link router (TL-R600VPN) but it seems to get bogged down quickly its also not compatible with the TP-Link Omada software or I would just got that route.

     

    So Aruba Instant On doesn't have a router? I guess I could also run pfsense. 

  4. I recently moved and need to upgrade my network. I am tired of fighting with the Frontier ISP router and the horrible wifi range. I was thinking Ubiquiti Unifi system or an Aruba Instant On. I really want something that's software defined but and not CLI. I'm sure many users here have decent networking setups so any input would be appreciated. 

  5. I need help deciphering what these attributes mean in scrutiny. I purchased two Seagate EXOS 8TB hard drives and one (my parity drive) shows failed Read Error Rate. Is this a comparison of data between my drive and Backblaze or is this actually failing? My smart reports all say PASSED. Given that this is my parity drive I would like to know before something really bad happens. 

    Screen Shot 2021-04-27 at 11.09.13 AM.png

  6. 2 hours ago, weirdcrap said:

    According to your disk.cfg, your default FS type is XFS and all of your disks are either explicitly set to use XFS or are set to auto (which I assume means they are XFS as well).

     

    You can see that loop2 is the BTRFS disk image under the advanced docker settings:

    image.thumb.png.9c521bf6c636edc0c770a58d5e8c42af.png

     

     

    EDIT: Oh I apologize, I missed your second question.

    You don't, UnRAID doesn't allow you to use XFS for the docker.img file. BTRFS is your only option as far as I'm aware.

    Squid replied in my other thread. You can use docker-xfs now in unRAID 6.9 rc2. You can change it I the the settings. I plan on upgrading my cache drive anyways tomorrow so I will realign and format it. 

  7. I’m getting constant writes to my cache drive (500GB SSD) and after upgrading to 6.9 rc2 I hoped it would fix it. I have narrowed down the issues to btrfs and loop2 in iotop. My question is why is btrfs showing up when my drive is xfs? Is the docker image or something else formatted as btrfs and if so can it be changed to docker-xfs? Also I have really know idea what loop2 means but I guess its the cache drive configuring and how unraid utilizes it?

     

     

  8. On 12/23/2019 at 6:55 PM, FreeMan said:

    It doesn't go away. As noted in the OP (or somewhere on the first page) if you do not have uPNP enabled, unRAID cannot set up the port forward for you, so it puts up the "nag" reminder and it stays. If it doesn't do the work for you, it can't tell that you've done it, so it just leaves it there.

     

    That said, maybe in some future version, it might be able notice a successful connection and remove the nag assuming that a connection means you got the port forward set up right.

    Thanks, Yes I got it working but I just assumed the "nag" reminder would go away. Thanks for the input though, it was driving me nuts. 

  9. My unraid system runs flawlessly even with the 6.8.0 update. I wanted to add an NVME PCIE SSD so I can transfer the files from it and format it. Every time I add it to the system my cache SSD (Sata) throws xfs errors and I need to repair it. I'm mounting the NVME as an unassigned device so I'm not really sure whats going on here. The NVME is my old windows 10 ntfs partition which shouldn't conflict with anything.

     

  10. I think adding the correct metrics worked. Since my 10gbe card is directly connected to another card in my workstation unRAID sees that and assumes it needs its own default route. I just set that to metric 2 and my default gateway (192.168.1.1) to metric 1 and it seemed to fix everything. Thanks @bonienl for comment regarding the router setup, that helped. Also thanks @ken-ji for the help with the metrics, the policy-based routing definitely made more sense once I read about it on the Cisco website. I may have had metrics setup prior to upgrading at some point and never changed it back after swapping nic cards or something. 

  11. From my experience the bridge label always matches the interface label, eth0 = br0, eth1 = br1, eth2 = br2. I have had so many networking issues like this since the last release of unRAID and I thought upgrading would fix it. For me the main issue is my default gateway changes to the wrong gateway every time I reboot now. My 10 gbe card isn't connected to the internet but it always uses that as the default gateway now. I know I can write a script to add the correct gateway but I would just like to know why.