karateo

Members
  • Posts

    198
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by karateo

  1. Wouldn't be better to modify permissions to read only instead of I don't know if a plugin has enough permissions to make such a change, though. EDIT: Forgot to say thank you
  2. Hi! I have been using plex for more than a year now. I noticed in my routers logs blocking access for a few android devices with plex app installed trying to connect to a bogon IP address. I found this address also in Plex docker. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? The weird thing is that the android devices are looking for 172.17.0.1 outside my lan in the internet. I googled before posting and the only think related (I think) is this https://github.com/timhaak/docker-plex/issues/54 09:19:19 firewall,info drop 172 forward: in:bridge-local out:pppoe-out1, src-mac xxxxxxx, proto TCP (SYN), 192.168.1.63:39411->172.17.0.1:32400, len 6 0 ErrorWarningSystemArrayLogin [s6-init] making user provided files available at /var/run/s6/etc...exited 0. [s6-init] ensuring user provided files have correct perms...exited 0. [fix-attrs.d] applying ownership & permissions fixes... [fix-attrs.d] done. [cont-init.d] executing container initialization scripts... [cont-init.d] 10-adduser: executing... ------------------------------------- _ _ _ | |___| (_) ___ | / __| | |/ _ \ | \__ \ | | (_) | |_|___/ |_|\___/ |_| Brought to you by linuxserver.io We do accept donations at: https://www.linuxserver.io/donations ------------------------------------- GID/UID ------------------------------------- User uid: 99 User gid: 100 ------------------------------------- [cont-init.d] 10-adduser: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 30-dbus: executing... [cont-init.d] 30-dbus: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 40-chown-files: executing... [cont-init.d] 40-chown-files: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 50-plex-update: executing... No update required [cont-init.d] 50-plex-update: exited 0. [cont-init.d] done. [services.d] starting services Starting dbus-daemon Starting Plex Media Server. [services.d] done. dbus[274]: [system] org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: Failed to set fd limit to 65536: Operation not permitted 6 3000 /config/Library/Application Support d Starting Avahi daemon Found user 'avahi' (UID 106) and group 'avahi' (GID 107). Successfully dropped root privileges. avahi-daemon 0.6.32-rc starting up. No service file found in /etc/avahi/services. *** WARNING: Detected another IPv4 mDNS stack running on this host. This makes mDNS unreliable and is thus not recommended. *** socket() failed: Address family not supported by protocol Failed to create IPv6 socket, proceeding in IPv4 only mode socket() failed: Address family not supported by protocol Joining mDNS multicast group on interface virbr0.IPv4 with address 192.168.122.1. New relevant interface virbr0.IPv4 for mDNS. Joining mDNS multicast group on interface docker0.IPv4 with address 172.17.0.1. New relevant interface docker0.IPv4 for mDNS. Joining mDNS multicast group on interface br0.IPv4 with address 192.168.1.2. New relevant interface br0.IPv4 for mDNS. Network interface enumeration completed. Registering new address record for 192.168.122.1 on virbr0.IPv4. [b]Registering new address record for 172.17.0.1 on docker0.IPv4.[/b] Registering new address record for 192.168.1.2 on br0.IPv4. Server startup complete. Host name is TOWER.local. Local service cookie is 1897350774.
  3. +1 for this no cache for shares just docker, VMs, torrent downloading
  4. I can't understand why you insist so much. You use an insecure OS so you have to protect it. You ask for 6.1.10 because you or someone else doesn't like 6.2. If they release 6.1.10 today are you going to ask for 6.1.11 in a month when new security holes will have been discovered?
  5. I don't disagree. But if you read carefully the second post, 6.1.9 was not anymore updated because 6.2 was about to be released. And if you ask for 6.1.10 for plugins/script compatibility, why not release 6.1.11 in a few months. Also, (I am asking) security patching never produces bugs? Lastly, as UnRaid is not the safest OS out there and everyone knows about it, using proper firewall rules provides the best "security patch". It's not the same, but by firewall securing the server, the security holes can not be accessed.
  6. To play Devil's Advocate, I'd like to give a reason for creating 6.1.10: 6.2 runs a new version of the kernel and some of the stock OS commands returns data in a different format than the same command in 6.1.x. Programs that expect data to exist in a certain spot from these modified commands are now broken under 6.2. My disk speed script in my sig doesn't function under 6.2 for example but does for every version from 5.0 to 6.1.9 One advantage to UNRAID is it's versatility. There are many released scripts & plugins available but who knows how many custom scripts are out there that people have written/acquired for their own use that may be broken under 6.2 forcing them to roll back if they're critical to them. it does not seem logical you suggest they maintain two parallel versions 6.1.x and x being 6.2 in a few days and so on sometime 6.1.x has to stop being developed when it was released sounds fair so all the development goes to the new versions
  7. Thank you both for your feedback. I have already read the ransomware thread and I have thought a lot about it. Currenlty I use an unassigned drive which I mount manually and sync using beyond compare (from a win VM) after comparing with checksumming. Also, I have an old synology 30 kilometeres away, that I manually power up and update once per month. I use beyond compare to find the files and copy them to an external usb drive which I plug to my synology and copy. I think I have done enought to protect agains Ransomware. Now about the on topic feature request. If there could be a raid1 subvolume the bitrod protection is provided. Also, the files would be protected for if (number of parity drives)+1 fail simultaneously. In addition the the above, the snapshot feature of btrfs+raid1 could provide protection against ransomware. The snapshots could be programmed to be taken in an interval that the user feels comfortable with. Unless all these are not compatible with how parity/ies work, it shouldn't be difficult to implement (A noob says ). A year ago when I purchased Unraid, I tried and created btrfs snapshots which the seem to work, but didn't do any more testing. I was just playing.
  8. I would like to have a share type which would mirror it's files silently in two or more different disks (excuding parity drive of course). Something like btrfs subvolumes raid1. It would also provide checksumming and self-healing. This would provide higher security level for some files without using an extra drive for 2nd parity and the checksumming. I believe there are lots of other people who use a small portion of the array for sensitive files (personal photos/videos) and the rest is movies/music. What do you think about it?
  9. I believe that the 6.2 stable is going to be released soon. What would be the procedure to upgrade from 6.1.9? Just clicking the upgrade button in Plugins page? And is there anything we should do to prepare our systems before updating? (moving appdata)?
  10. Thanks again! You were really helpful!
  11. Big thanks for this excellent description. From your post, I would buy the 2x4 and use 4 dimms. From the slide, especially the note about "most desktop chip sets designed for 32 address load" So with my 4 dimms unbuffered will have 36 address load when with buffered just 32!!!! So why do the provide 4 dimm slots!!! Also, if fault happens because of the address load, the ECC will recover it so there would be only a performance hit. Not reliability problem. If the above is correct, buffered would be mostly beneficial for high memory usage >>12Gb and with high memory reads/writes. I don't believe it will affect copying of photos/videos that I mostly care about! This is my motherboards chipset but I can not find the "design of memory load" http://ark.intel.com/products/75522/Intel-DH82C226-PCH
  12. Note about ECC: I know that, thank you. About 2nd note: As I have no experience at all with ECC memory I didn't know that. As it's difficult to sell 2x2Gb ECC memory, I have to install it to a identical system at work without really any need for this. Just to use them somewhere. Also, I should spend instead of €62 for 2x4Gb = 12Gb total , €114 for 2x8Gb = 16Gb total. Almost double the money without the need for the extra memory. Is it going to be unreliable (trying to understand the term "more reliable")? I believe not. Have you seen a live case or is it the theory? Isn't it the same with "the more data put into memory the more likely is to have a fault"!? It's my first Xeon cpu and ECC memory! Of course I will memtest and I can do it for several days to be extra safe.
  13. thank you both, this is what I knew
  14. Sorry to hijack but it's a quick question and it's relevant to the topic. I have a HP Workstation Z230 SFF with 4 dimm sockets available. Now I use 2x2Gb ECC ram probably in dual channel as it came from the manufacturer. I want to upgrade and I plan to ADD 2x4Gb to get total 12Gb. Will I lose the dual channel bonus using 2x2 and 2x4 modules? Is each channel individual? I asked at the store I plan to buy them from and this is what the told me. Thanks in advance!
  15. karateo, you've not got much RAM, so I don't necessarily think this is the same issue. You may be running into the fact that if the host OS needs RAM (and you've only left 2.5GB for Unraid) it'll kill the VM to get it. The fix is to add more RAM. In general Unraid itself on V6 needs at least 4GB. I know I need more memory but it's difficult to find here in Greece PC3-10600E Unbuffered DIMM ECC Should't there be any log entry somewhere to make sure that it's this the cause?
  16. I have CPU: Intel® Xeon® CPU E3-1230 v3 @ 3.30GHz Memory: 4096 MB and assigned 1.5Gb to the VM (sorry for the delay)
  17. I have a similar problem. Win 7 and I get random shut downs. Could be within seconds or days! Here is my log
  18. Hi again! I tried in the past to run 2 dropbox dockers (me and wife) but without success. After a few days (probably after modifying files through lan) they stop working. So I ended up creating a VM just for dropbox! I read that topic http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=48166 and I thought to give another try. What are the drawbacks of this? I use public and private shares and connect with custom user and not root.
  19. but your solution is less cost effective! one cache and one more for seeding! It's not cost effective to buy a cache drive of several TB in size. My seeding on my desktop PC (which I'm migrating to unraid) is nearly 2TB in size.
  20. too much trouble I think just keep deluge folders in cache and make sonarr/couchpotato copy finished downloads and of course replace cache drive with bigger size also think that when you download you write to two disks it's a waste of disk live and power in my opinion
  21. Hi! I am a newbie at bash scripting so please excuse the immaturity of my coding skills. I am sure, simple tasks have been made more complex, but the result is that matters. I also use UnRaid for less than two months! #IDEA TAKEN FROM http://webgnuru.com/linux/rsync_incremental.php #IDEA TAKEN FROM http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=31876 #IDEA TAKEN FROM Unraid Forum user WeeboTech I have finished the part of making local snapshots, and now I need to start reading about rsync so that I get similar results with remote server. I want my Unraid server to send snapshots to remote Synology server. It's still work in progress and I know that I started building from the bottom to top! Bear in mind that I am a bash NOOB, using linux only with Unraid and some experimental builds in the past (debian, arch, gentoo). Also, I have two babies around so I was working 5 minutes at a time! I am waiting for your comments! Thank you all for your time! rsnapshot.sh.txt
  22. when I had similar symptoms I found through console that my root folder / was 100% full I rebooted into safe mode and I had no problems then I removed all plugins and started to install one at a time still I am running rock stable with more plugins than before So I didn't find the cause, but found a solution with the help os the forum! http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=44969.0
  23. +1 make use of unraid to build a good copy of your files by rebuilding into a new disk. keep the bad disk in case another one is failing during the rebuilding