Vr2Io

Sorry to mke you confused, the first word "Yes" means I agree what you say, I know how split level work, but in some special situation it will out of expectations and I assume you would understand that and I haven't explain in detail. As mention, in last year, I rewrite whole array, I use rsync for all, but rsync have a issue, when it start wring to target, it will create many empty folder first, and this will break those split rule, let say file should writing to disk 2,3,4 but due to empty folder create to disk 2 first, it will affect most file go to disk2 ..... And if I have three target disk, I will well planning whole structure then fire three session to speedup the copying. Then last fine tune how to copy the remaining. Anyway all are expected.

Yes, the reaason for this happen usually because physical disk or total disk no. charge, then some folder will allocate on different disk. In last year, I rewrite all from 8 to 3 disks, then about 5% file/folder allocate on different disk, finally I fix it manually. If change back from 3 to 8 disks then I would expect much more folder on different disk will happen painfully.

Thanks your reply and clarify.

Reading whole thread and try to understand the purpose of the plugin are free-up space on disk, but I would think if that happen, then it just mean user not well planning at all. But I also interest to ask do you mean plugin will check UR "split-level' setting and affect the moving logic ? I assume answer is YES, because if whole folder move then it usually impossible due to target disk also haven't enough space. Below are my use case for ref., this not about to free-up space, it is house keeping wanted. . User should well planning the structure and with UR split-level setting then it should not running out-of-space issue. . But split-level won't help to keep folder-level in same disk ( I think most people want that ) My solution was manual delete ( or move to temp folder ) all smallest file(s) which out of target disk within target folder-level, and sync back again, then all will allocate in same disk. And I hope a plug-in could do this for me. ( Just the direction, not all step list out )

Not sure side effect for disable VBS, but interesting 👍

Great and so many useful message 👍

Quick check and I think most your founding should be normal, because vlan 20,30 IP assign are "none", I also setting in this way as I want my router do all routing work for me. If this not your planning, then you should assign IP or setting IP on those interface. And don't setting same subnet 192.168.1.0/24 for br0 br2.

所有都說得對, 其實官方從來都少參與論壇的回答, 策略與大家期望不一樣的. 熱心回答的網友來來回回都是那幾位, 中文不是他們的語言, 怎會照顧到. 國內不是開放型, UR 亦沒太大競爭力, 這兩点已決定一切.

👍

Problem look like backplane doesn't work well with 9305 ( many reset error in the log ), you have few way for further test. Direct connect disk to 9305 ( work as SATA and bypass the backplane ) to test does 9305 work well in system. If have old LSI HBA ( if 8087, then need 8087 to 8643 cable ) to test does all work well. By observe, there are a chip on each backplane and it doesn't look like for enclosure management only, SAS signal may go through this chip.

OK, then this not same issue as my case. If you have another PC ( Windows ), then I would suggest you verify does file transfer still corrupt.

Could you use rsync to copy file from array to cache and found rsync indicate re-copy again ? Then use rsync to copy file hardisk-to-hardisk, and check any different. Array -> cache and cache to array = Mismatch

I means this is a quick way to make different test.

I can't remember the behavior of copy file corrupt in that time, but it seems not always, it look like as below. So you need systematic to perform test hash remote file through network no problem copy file from harddisk to hardisk ( same controller ) no problem copy cross between media ( i.e. nvme <-> harddisk ) have problem, even with other nvme

Depends on the type of theme, you will found a icon in top right coner or most left sdie For example

Use build-in terminal also fine.

For native backup script /usr/local/emhttp/webGui/scripts/flash_backup The file naming change to "xxx-boot-backup-*.zip" from "xxx-flash-backup-*.zip" ..... does this is design to reflect for internal boot backup ? Any procedure / doc to show how can quickly restore the backup to resume Unraid OS ? Or could native script generate both file ( flash & boot ), so user could easy resume OS to USB.

So, this not network relate. I have same issue in a new build before, after troubleshooting few days, problem gone suddenly and no more again ( I have RMA the mobo later ). If you hash remote file through network got mismatch, then it should be other issue. A quicker way to make test ( no need copy whole file and hash ), is use rsync in therminal, copy file, it will recopy again if problem happen. rsync /aaa/bbb/sourcefile /ccc/ddd/destfile --progress

Great !!

Seems original have 5 cable, but still have 18 plug.

The last four octets are the IP address, so aa:00:ff:XX is 170.00.255.XX ( this may break if you set by parameters ) ..... I use fix IP for docker, so its MAC address also fixed.

For doing FIFO, the first method in my mind was using Windows file copy from Unraid cache to Array, you can start in several copy task and Windows will queue the copying. But Windows couldn't handle if there are too much file. ** forget it, it couldn't overcome if file have cache in RAM, that's why you ask how to stopping RAM cache. **

I never touch the behavior of RAM cache ( for my understand it couldn't stop ), the main build are spinner disk only, I need capacity and try my best to got throughput next.

I also like large RAM cache, my main Unraid have 256GB memory. For RAM cache, it never work as FIFO, it more like many-to-many. I almost stop using cache since day one, it is not because automatic switch between RMW or RW. In that time there are no SSD, and due to I have limited disk count, so cache never my option. As my disk count have expand much, so I could try different storage combination, but I still don't like cache ( main reason also because this build not always on ). One of advantage of large RAM cache when move many file to array in multiple disk ( no parity ) , I will temporary change array allocation to "most-free", then files will cache in RAM and move to array in multiple disk most time, it will reduce overall completion time. Anyway, I like strip pool more then mover, my current version are no parity array (3 data disks) and two large strip pool (each have 12 disks) No parity array are make since last yrs, I re-arrange 16 disks. ( change small size disk in array to large disk size in array, so 2p6d to 0p3d )

It should because you missing cache pool device, if no more in system, try "new config" to remove it. Feb 10 19:43:02 EVA emhttpd: cache: ERROR:missing devices diskId="JM_icron_Tech_DD564198839D4-0:0"