robertoal

this fixed it! THANKS!!

The following error occurs: when pressing (from the dropdown menu on a docker icon in the dashboard) Sart, stop or restart. So using dockers became very difficult. The same goes for the docker menu (it seems to use same dropdowns) AND i cannot delete the docker containers anymore because the 'yes, delete it' button doesn't work anymore. Can someone help me with this very annoying problem? Background info: - This behavior began on an arbitrary moment - It happened with 6.8.3 stable - Updated it to 6.9.0 beta25 - same problem - Used chrome, firefox, edge, internet explorer - same problem

Internal (if you have a home network) you should use http: enabling https is more hassle. From the internet you want https, for this use the NginxProxyManager docker. (reverse proxy)

You sir are a king! Thank you VERY much. It works like a charm! @Abigel If you change the portmapping from standard you have to manually add the port into browser: x.x.x.x:NEW_PORT Or: If you go to edit docker, and turn on advanced view in the top right corner you can change the WebUI text box to: http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/ (change the 80 with the non ssl port, or: https://[IP]:[PORT:443] (change the 443 with the ssl port) This enables the right click go to webui again.

Absolutely sure! Can you please advise me on this? I have some bad experiences with changing rights of the nextcloud folder.. The last times I tried stuff like this nextcloud gave me the 'rights' error and after that the internal server error lol. So the rights at this moment are in the docker container: drwxrwx--- 1 www-data root 246 Mar 29 13:31 data From the unraid terminal: drwxrwx--- 1 sshd root 246 Mar 29 13:31 data/ If I get this correctly: the root folder on unraid itself (data in this case) does not inherit the rights given IN the docker container? So: if I add the users: 'nobody' and 'users' which is the same as the other shares: drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 0 Mar 14 15:23 SHARE_NAME/ It should work? Or do I need to change the rights in the docker container as well?

Yes it is x64, and it should work but it doesn't (I did install the apps from the start) no matter now: it works with the external onlyoffice docker. My path are set as follows: I have acces to /mnt/user/nextcloud. (and can create folders/files, so the share is working) I don't have acces to /mnt/user/nextcloud/data -> the error is: I do not have permission to acces the folder.

@knex666 I had, as mentioned some time ago, the exact same problem; solved it with an external onlyoffice docker. Reinstalling for me did nothing! Very strange is it not? Have a follow op question: I can't acces the mounted data folder from a windows machine (the mounted folder is a share on the unraid server). I thought this had to do with: ExtraParams: --user 99:100 --sysctl net.ipv4.ip_unprivileged_port_start=0 PostArgs: && docker exec -u 0 NAME_OF_THIS_CONTAINER /bin/sh -c 'echo "umask 000" >> /etc/apache2/envvars' So I added these to the specific textboxes, but no dice unfortanatly. Can you help me debug this problem? I really appreciate the time you invest in this thread!!

Hi there, I'm positive i'm running your image! But it just didn't work from the start.. now idea what's going on. But: does work now though. Good idea about mounting the php.ini! will do this. Lastly: now getting talk to work reliably! Thanks for your help.

THank you for this quick reply! With me the onlyoffice didn't work out of the box? Which addres should I use in the nextcloud: onlyoffice settings then? Finally: Where can I change the php settings? Memory is limited now to 512... Very much appreciated all the work you put into this!!! edit: I think i found it by: php --ini in the console: /usr/local/etc/php/conf.d/memory-limit.ini Changed it there and seems to work so far!

Found out some limitations.. When not using bridge, but an specific IP addres for the docker i get this MariaDB error: Failed to connect to the database: An exception occurred in driver: SQLSTATE[HY000] [2002] No such file or directory Solution: just use bridge ande forwarde the port like stated on the first page, but use port 80 for container port instead of 8080. There seems to be problem to docker to docker communication when using a specific IP addres (any docker to any docker, not just nextcloud) When trying to edit the config.php file from a samba share in windows the file appears to be empty. It isnt: just ssh to the unraid box and edit it there. Question: What is the right port for the internal openoffice installation? I now use an extra docker for this..

@testdasi Thank you for thinking with me here. 1. I'm not really good in programming in general, although I have some experience with Python. I hope I have the time to make a project of this ! 2. This is a really good idea, but.. it is almost the same as using the cache as a temp drive isnt it? So the user has to manually copy the files to another directory when he/she is done with the project. It is not the end of the world but again: FiFo looks like a very logical solution for this use case. (and for the limetech team probably quite easy to implement) 3. I have a 4*800gb ssd cache array at the moment; trimming in a cache array IS permitted isnt it?

A little update: I haven't been able to script the FiFo concept yet unfortunately; i'm simply not experienced enough with bash 🙂 So I will leave this feature to be added (hopefully) in the feature. Thanks nuhll for baring with me, and for the solution you mention. Thing is with all these soltions: I want full transparancy for the users. THey don't need to think about where to move which files, so now I use the ' move above 80% usage' scheme; although nog optimal it is workable. Is it really that critical if your photos get read from non cache? I mean, they wont be 100s of GB? Yes: the .nef arent' that large by itself: 40/50 mb but especially with multiple users selecting photo's for the final selection a HDD is very noticeable. And: I don't wan't to spin up the drives all the time, with the right caching scheme (FiFo) they should only spin once a week or something like that which is good for longevity.

Sorry didn't read that bit.. (i think he edited his post) find /boot/ -type f -name mover doesnt seem to find a mover script.. any idea where the new one is located?

Yes, which is why rsync copies the files from the cache to /mnt/user0, en subsequently removes files from the cache drive? Everything located in /mnt/user0 will be shown in /mnt/user, correct? See this post:

Again all of you thanks for the replies! @primeval_god You are right: but again: the mover moves ALL files, not just the oldest ones, correct? I searched the forum with FIFO caching, caching, data based caching and so forth. I will try search for it again but with the script tag added 🙂 @nuhll I don't think i explained my question well enough. As you say the mover can be invoked at a set percentage or a set time. But then it moves ->ALL<- of the files from the cache drive to the array, correct? So this means that the moment the 50% (as stated in your example) disk usages hits anybody working on a project has there projects moved to the slow array: this is the opposite of what I want! Right now I have the standard raid10 mode with my cache ssd's (4 of them). Just the other day the wrong 2 went bad, which means I last all my vm's, docker etc. Especially on critical projects (most of the projects are weddings so thats pretty much always) i want to be on the safe side.. That seems so overcomplicated and useless -> So no, I don't think it is. Or maybe i'm still missing something here? The only extra thing I want the mover to do essentially is: move everything based on date until threshold is reached? @trurl Indeed: I discovered this: it is why there is a /mnt/user0 drive. the /mnt/user/$Share folders aggregrates everything from cache en array drives I think?