trurl
-
Posts
43882 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
137
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Report Comments posted by trurl
-
-
9 minutes ago, foux said:
Because I'm using 80 and 443 ports for other things
Often those other things could be using something else. That's whole point of docker port mappings, for example.
-
3 hours ago, foux said:
88443 might be the issue! It's the https port I put for the webgui.
Why are you using a non-standard port for the webUI anyway?
-
1 hour ago, Meannekes said:
No VM or Docker is running
Is Docker or VM Manager enabled in Settings?
-
1 minute ago, L0rdRaiden said:
Should I create the zfs pool in the array section or in the pool section of unRAID webui?
Array is still individual disks not pools. Each array disk can be a separate zfs disk but not a pool.
QuoteZFS Pools
New in this release is the ability to create a ZFS file system in a user-defined pool. In addition you may format any data device in the unRAID array with a single-device ZFS file system.
-
1
-
-
Just did the upgrade from 6.11.5 no problems.
I had been sitting this one out since zfs isn't in my immediate future, but decided to get familiar with the webUI changes.
One thing I noticed is my libvirt is 10G instead of 1G, looking at my backup I see 10G is what it was before so not related to upgrade. But it's not something I would have changed so I wonder how it got that way and when.
-
3 minutes ago, Zonediver said:
Have you seen this "RED MARKED" Text on the right side?
Yes. That does help explain the confusing cache:yes and cache:prefer settings somewhat, but why keep the confusing settings when there is a better way?
-
1
-
-
19 minutes ago, Zonediver said:
Well... i understand, what this means - but its not necessary, because? See this...
Your screenshot is actually the result of many iterations of changes to v6 webUI trying to help people understand. Now that you already understand it maybe it seems unnecessary to you.
-
Another thing the concept of Secondary does is bring more attention to the often overlooked concepts of Overflow and Minimum Free.
-
Just now, hawihoney said:
And the cache is gone with that RC4 release. Got it now.
Since the advent of multiple pools in 6.9, 'cache' has just been one possible name for a pool (except for the confusing way the word continued to be used for labeling those user share settings).
-
8 minutes ago, trurl said:
The old way and the new way of thinking are functionally the same
If all you have is the array, and no cache or other pools, then your Primary is the array, and secondary is none
If you have a pool named 'cache', then
- cache:no = Primary:array, Secondary:none
- cache:only = Primary:cache, Secondary:none
- cache:yes = Primary:cache, Secondary:array, Mover action: cache->array
- cache:prefer = Primary:cache, Secondary:array, Mover action: array->cache
Just substitute another pool name for 'cache' above for other pools.
-
1
-
7
-
12 hours ago, Zonediver said:
Now i am more confused then before... 🤪
This is definitely an improvement. I never could think of a good way to clear up the confusion of the "old" way of thinking. I think this is it.
What we have with 6.11:
- A user share setting labeled "Use cache pool", which isn't necessarily about a pool named 'cache' since we can name pools as we wish. The 4 possible values for this setting are not self-explanatory, and has always confused new users.
- Another user share setting labeled "Select cache pool" which is not necessarily about a pool named 'cache'. This setting is where you specify which pool that other setting is about.
What we have with 6.12rc4:
- A user share setting labeled Primary storage which specifies where new files are written.
- A user share setting labeled Secondary storage which specifies where overflow gets written.
- A user share setting labeled Mover action which specifies source/destination for mover.
The old way and the new way of thinking are functionally the same, but the new way is much easier to explain and understand. And it provides a way forward for future functionality.
-
1
-
3
-
Why do you want to do this?
-
Just changing the SSH port is not a way to secure this. Bots will just find whatever other port you configure. You need a VPN or proxy
Also, Diagnostics REQUIRED for bug reports.
-
32 minutes ago, jakami99 said:
trying to fully empty my cache drive containing appdata/docker-files
Nothing can move open files. Did you disable Docker and VM Manager in Settings?
-
diagnostics required for bug reports.
-
12 hours ago, KyleS said:
What on earth are you talking about. There's nothing in there.
I was trying to understand what you were talking about in your first post.
QuoteNone of my shares are showing up
We see lots of different things a user might mean by this sentence.
User Shares not showing up in the webUI (often a browser problem)
and/or
User Share(s) not showing up on the network (could be several reasons)
Maybe even
Nothing showing up at /mnt/user (occasionally user shares are broken due to filesystem corruption on a disk or something)
Can you understand why I didn't know what you meant at first? It took several tries to get something that made enough sense to investigate.
You haven't even told us which prerelease you are using.
I agree that if I create that folder it does not get displayed in User Shares (on 6.11.5).
Still don't understand why you would want a user share with such a name. I'm guessing you are considering creating lots of folders with similar names as some sort of workaround. Maybe there is a better workaround such as creating a VM for handling your special case.
I'm not sure this should be considered Urgent.
-
You haven't given us enough information to even know what you're talking about.
Diagnostics is a good way to give us some start on trying to understand.
Can you get diagnostics?
-
14 hours ago, trurl said:
diagnostics required for bug reports.
-
-
No announcement, no way to get it from Tools - Update.
Not released.
-
I don't see how an unreleased beta can be Urgent.
-
1
-
-
-
To rule out any plugins. Booting in SAFE mode is actually a requirement for bug reports.
-
Are you booting in SAFE mode?
Unraid OS version 6.12.0-rc5 available
-
-
-
-
-
in Prereleases
Posted
Why would you map container ports to host ports 80 and 443?
If the container uses ports 80 and 443, you map those container ports to other host ports.
The whole point of docker port mappings is to make a container use other host ports that aren't being used by something else.