tjb_altf4

Members
  • Posts

    1386
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Report Comments posted by tjb_altf4

  1. 4 hours ago, luzfcb said:

    Hello, I'm learning how VPN works with Unraind and I would like to know if there's any way to undo any configuration I've done in VPN Manager in order to get it back to the default initial configuration.
    I missed a delete button or something. If the button exists, I couldn't find it instinctively.

     


    image.thumb.png.ecc0cab22478f8b4eb52c459f1618898.png

    Toggle from BASIC to ADVANCED on the grey bar corresponding to the Tunnel you want to remove, a DELETE TUNNEL option will appear.

    • Like 1
  2. 15 hours ago, scot said:

    Third: ZFS is using logical drives as part of its assignment.  it is MUCH safer to use disk-by-id to assign drive info.  (so a device hw GUID vs /dev/sba) so then if you remove a drive and put it back it ALWAYS gets the correct information and it is easier to deal with failures etc. 

     


                sdf1    ONLINE       0     0     0
                sdg1    ONLINE       0     0     0
      VS:

    ata-Hitachi_HDS722020ALA330_[..] ONLINE 0 0 0

    ata-Hitachi_HDS722020ALA330_[..] ONLINE 0 0 0

    Not played with ZFS on Unraid yet, but this doesn't sound right, Unraid has always used disk-by-id for assignments for the reasons stated.
    Possibly some ambiguity caused by how the information is presented? 

  3. 3 hours ago, mattalat said:

    Searched through all the comments and couldn't find an answer - also I apologize if this is a dumb question. What does the autotrim feature do? How is it different from scheduling trim?

    Instead of garbage collection happening on a schedule, e.g. once a day, it happens as soon as possible.

  4. 1 hour ago, xaositek said:

    image.thumb.png.1f38da238765c68586a9e94242905879.png

     

    There is another branch beyond Stable and Next called Test.

    Test only appears if you install a specific plugin that adds that development branch, or if you directly installed from the test branch (which it looks like you have - no previous installs).

  5. If your problem is incorrect temp reporting, which is specific to the newer samsung nvme devices like the 980, this thread from 6 months ago has a fix.

     

    But are you sure you don't simply need to change the temp warning ranges for your nvme?

    The default temp ranges are 45-55C for all storage devices in Unraid, which is too low for nvme and will definitely trigger warnings when under a reasonable load.

     

    I usually change this for my nvme devices to 55-65C (which is still a bit below spec for most nvmes) and rarely get temp warnings. This change can be done by clicking on the device name (e.g. Cache, Cache 2), from the MAIN tab

    image.png.b13e0e0d5f7a7819bd1f2f00eb7e5844.png

    • Thanks 1
  6. well I messed up that original reply somehow... sorry mods

     

    46 minutes ago, tombunraider said:

    I saw that v6.11.0-rc2 is released now, but there's currently no changelog or thread.

     

    There is always a cumulative changelog available through the Unraid GUI :)
     

    image.thumb.png.648938a64fa9d04298cdfe6b03eb1c48.png

    • Haha 1
  7. I can see some iptable call traces. 

    I saw similar after moving from a solid 6.9.2 to 6.10.x, where I was seeing random crashes during btrfs balance/scrubs.

    Try stopping your docker services (setting > docker >  enable docker > no)  and setting Docker custom network type to ipvlan (from macvlan).

    For me, that fixed those call traces that locked up my server.

  8. 4 minutes ago, JorgeB said:

    Having a second vfs object "fixed" the problem because apparently Unraid only loads the last one, so basically wasn't loading "vfs objects = btrfs", on a related note if I needed to set two or more vfs objects for one share how could I do that?

    vfs objects = vfs_object_1 vfs_object_2

    Pretty sure that's how you're meant to do it

    • Like 1