dockerPolice

May 17, 2022

1 hour ago, utentep2p said:

I've update a RUN of this unraid-docker,

If changes to the template are required, you should talk to LinuxServer on their discord about making those changes.

September 27, 2020

55 minutes ago, sonic6 said:

3 versions from scrutiny...What are the difference and which one should i use?

Welcome to my life...

Fundamentally nothing (if anything)

While slightly differing versions of the same app aren't a bad thing (backup versions etc), this is one of those apps where future versions being submitted to CA will probably be declined to avoid confusion and the same question.

Quote

In the situations where there is already a multitude of certain applications available (ie: Plex, nzbGet, Radarr, etc) new submissions of those applications will not be accepted. An exception may however be made if the new submission brings something unique to the application. This is at the discretion of the moderators of CA.

https://forums.unraid.net/topic/87144-ca-application-policies-notes/

This is one of the apps where the moderators of CA *may* remove without warning one of the scrutiny apps present within CA... In this particular case IF one of the versions gets removed it would either be self hosters or hotio

September 27, 2020

1 minute ago, saarg said:

As far as I know Pydio is not deprecated.

https://pydio.com/en/features/why-migrating-pydio-8-cells

September 27, 2020

Am I correct in assuming then that linuxserver/pydio is now deprecated (since it is Pydio-8 which Pydio is recommending to migrate to pydio-cells)?

September 27, 2020

1 hour ago, saarg said:

I don't think aptalca have not made any containers in his private repo since he joined linuxserver a long time ago.

They're all from prior to his joining lsio, and since DigiKam had no direct replacement in another active repository, it stayed within Apps. Now it's officially deprecated, (along with JDownloader2 - as there's other replacements for that one also)

September 6, 2020

16 minutes ago, saarg said:

There is nothing different except the name.

Along with the repository that it's pulling from. Not to mention that the original displays

On 8/29/2020 at 7:34 AM, ich777 said:

* This image has been deprecated * * * * Use the new image at * * * * linuxserver/swag *

Seems to me that the template should be updated

August 29, 2020

1 hour ago, ich777 said:

Is this container now depricated or not because this message apperas now:

Certainly appears to be as of a week ago. (https://blog.linuxserver.io/2020/08/21/introducing-swag/) I would expect that @aptalca will shortly adjust the Unraid template to reflect this change.

April 26, 2020

While I usually do an annual / semi annual spanking of the template maintainers, a new check on all the templates is necessitating a whipping of the maintainers.

There is obviously some confusion regarding the <WebUI> entry

This entry can never directly reference a specific IP address. (http://192.5.0.1 is not acceptable as an entry)
While you shouldn't ever directly reference a specific port, *technically* it is ok if the container does not run in bridge mode.
All references to [PORT:xx] reference the container port. It does NOT reference the host port

IE: Everything should be

 http://[IP]:[PORT:xx]/

where xx is the container port. This allows the user to change the ports as much as they want without having to switch to template authoring mode and advanced view in order to also change the WebUI entry. Keeping with the right format significantly lowers the support requests here on the forum.

While the application feed is now going to do it's best to automatically adjust the WebUI entry to what it should be, all maintainers should update their templates accordingly. IMO, having 157 errors present in the appfeed (most of which are corrected by the feed itself) isn't really acceptable. (Also, the common mistake of creating a category out of thin air is so prevalent that it's not even counted any more. unRAID uses categories, not tagging.)

Additionally, v1 templates have been deprecated now since 6.2.0. There are a few entries regarding non-existent webUI ports below where the maintainer has for some reason chosen to make a v2 template by hand by manually editing a previously existing v1 template and add in a few <Config> entries and not add in all of them that would technically be required. (eg: They have ports defined in the v1 section but not in the v2 section). While this does currently work, there is no guarantee that it will work in the future.

The easiest way to create a template is by simply entering in the appropriate information into Add Template screen and hitting SAVE. 90% of the following errors (excluding the WebUI errors) would not exist if that happened.

Aggie1999's Repository
    wbynum/qemubackup:
        No Icon specified within the application template
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config

alturismo's Repository
    dnsforge/xteve:latest:
        No Support Link Present

Andrew207's Repository
    atunnecliffe/splunk:
        Hardcoded port found in webUI entry

aptalca's Repository
    aptalca/docker-zoneminder:
        Fatal: No valid Overview Or Description present - Application dropped from CA automatically - Possibly far too many formatting tags present

atribe's Repository
    atribe/apcupsd-influxdb-exporter:
        No Icon specified within the application template
    achumchal/plex_data_collector_for_influxdb:
        No Icon specified within the application template
    barrycarey/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana:
        No Icon specified within the application template

bashNinja's Repository
    bashninja/docker-pritunl:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to https://[IP]:[PORT:443]

Bender's Repository
    traefik:latest:
        Not a valid Registry entry set.  Creating from Repository setting
        Hardcoded IP address for webUI.  It should always be [IP] instead.
        Hardcoded port found in webUI entry
    boerderij/varken:
        Invalid WebUI
    acockburn/appdaemon:
        No Registry entry set.  Created from Repository setting
        Hardcoded IP address for webUI.  It should always be [IP] instead.
        Hardcoded port found in webUI entry

Bungy's Repository
    sameersbn/gitlab:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/
    jshridha/motioneye:latest:
        No category entry present
        Blacklisted: Obvious CA conversion templates are disallowed
    owncloud:
        No category entry present
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/
    jshridha/rdiffweb:
        No Icon specified within the application template
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:8080]
    centurylink/watchtower:
        No category entry present
        No Icon specified within the application template

CaptInsano's Repository
    captinsano/koel:
        No category entry present
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:8080]/
    captinsano/legacyrutorrent:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/
    captinsano/rutorrent:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/

cheesemarathon's Repository
    coderaiser/cloudcmd:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:8000]
    minio/minio:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:9000]/

chvb's Repository
    chvb/docker-apache-php:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/
    chvb/docker-kerio-connect:
        Unknown category Network:Email

clowrym's Repository
    hexparrot/mineos:
        No category entry present
    ninjaneer/plex-discord-bot:
        Unknown category Uncategorized:
        No Icon specified within the application template
        No Support Link Present

cmer's Repository
    cmer/minio:
        Fatal: Multiple Repositories Found - Removing application from lists

Conmyster's Repository
    zabbix/zabbix-agent:latest:
        Multiple Category tags present - using longest one

CorneliousJD's Repository
    acockburn/appdaemon:
        No Registry entry set.  Created from Repository setting

d8ahazard's Repository
    digitalhigh/flextv:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]
    digitalhigh/huedream:
        Not a valid Registry entry set.  Creating from Repository setting
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config

d8sychain's Repository
    d8sychain/mediawiki:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config

DavidSpek's Repository
    rocker/rstudio:
        No Support Link Present

dee31797's Repository
    djaydev/motioneye:
        Unknown category Media:
        Unknown category Servers:

dibbz' Repository
    quimnut/brewpi-wifi:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/
    quimnut/cloud9ide:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:8080]/
    gogs/gogs:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:3000]/

digiblur's Repository
    homeassistant/amd64-hassio-supervisor:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config
    adolfintel/speedtest:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]
    raymondmm/tasmoadmin:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/
    danmed/tasmobackupv1:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config
    iotreboot/tasui:latest:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config
    nico640/docker-unms:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to https://[IP]:[PORT:443]

docgyver's Repository
    https://raw.githubusercontent.com/docgyver/unraid-v6-plugins/master/denyhosts.plg:
        No Icon specified within the application template
    https://raw.githubusercontent.com/docgyver/unraid-v6-plugins/master/ssh.plg:
        No Icon specified within the application template

ElectricBrainUK's Repository
    electricbrainuk/unraidapi:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]

eXisTa's Repository
    xirixiz/dsmr-reader-docker:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config

fanningert's Repository
    guacamole/guacd:
        Unknown category Network:Mangament
        No Support Link Present

frakman1's Repository
    gitlab/gitlab-runner:
        No category entry present
        Blacklisted: Obvious CA conversion templates are disallowed

gfjardim's Repository
    needo/nzbdrone:
        Multiple Descriptions Found
        Fatal: No valid Overview Or Description present - Application dropped from CA automatically - Possibly far too many formatting tags present
    https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gfjardim/unRAID-plugins/master/plugins/statistics.sender.plg:
        No Support Link Present

Grack's Repository
    gregyankovoy/chowdown:
        No category entry present
    gregyankovoy/goaccess:
        No category entry present
    gregyankovoy/lftp-mirror:
        No category entry present
        No Icon specified within the application template

hernandito's Repository
    hernandito/hernando-apachephp-docker:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/
    hernandito/docker-apache-php-adminer:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/
    hernandito/docker-resourcespace:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/

ich777's Repository
    ich777/doh-client:
        No category entry present
        No Support Link Present
    ich777/doh-server:
        No category entry present
    ich777/jenkins:
        No category entry present
    ich777/mtaserver:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config
    ich777/online-check-pushover:
        No category entry present
    ich777/remmina:
        No category entry present
    ich777/stun-turn-server:
        No Support Link Present
    zabbix/zabbix-server-mysql:
        No category entry present
    zabbix/zabbix-web-nginx-mysql:
        No category entry present

JBartlett's Repository
    jbartlett777/diskspeed:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:8888]/

JCloud's Repository
    quantumobject/docker-cacti:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/cacti
    analogic/poste.io:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/

jcreynolds' Repository
    jcreynolds/flextv:
        Unknown category Media:
        Unknown category Applications:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]
        No Support Link Present

jj9987's Repository
    janarj/cloudflare-ddns:1.1:
        No Icon specified within the application template
        No Support Link Present

josywong's Repository
    ipfs/go-ipfs:
        No Icon specified within the application template
    angelics/unraid-docker-ipxe-buildweb:
        Unknown category Services:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]
    angelics/unraid-docker-zelcore-wallet:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:5800]

knex666's Repository
    knex666/mopidy:3-experimental:
        No Support Link Present
    nextcloud:latest:
        No Registry entry set.  Created from Repository setting
    knex666/rssnotipy:
        No category entry present
    kevineye/snapcast:
        No category entry present
        No Support Link Present
    doudou34/tor-server:
        No Registry entry set.  Created from Repository setting
        No Support Link Present

Kru-X's Repository
    wekanteam/wekan:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:8080]/
    wordpress:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config

linuxserver's Repository
    linuxserver/codiad:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/
    linuxserver/sickgear:
        No category entry present

malvarez00's Repository
    gitlab/gitlab-ce:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]
        No Support Link Present
    malvarez00/docker-unifi-video:
        Unknown category Media:
        Unknown category Servers:

MarkusMcNugen's Repository
    markusmcnugen/sftp:latest:
        No Registry entry set.  Created from Repository setting

MrChunky's Repository
    storjlabs/storagenode:beta:
        No Support Link Present

Mudislander's Repository
    mudislander/fogproject:
        Invalid WebUI
        No Support Link Present
    bl0m1/xtevedocker:
        No category entry present
        CPU pinning removed from template
        No Icon specified within the application template

p.wrangles' Repository
    wranglatang/bluelinky:
        No Icon specified within the application template

rix's Repository
    rix1337/docker-myjd-api:
        No category entry present
    rix1337/docker-ripper:
        Multiple Category tags present - using longest one
    rix1337/docker-verarbeitung:
        No category entry present

runraid's Repository
    ronnieroller/ddns:
        No Support Link Present
    kthulu120/liquid_dl:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config
        No Support Link Present
    kmb32123/youtube-dl-server:
        No Support Link Present

sdesbure's Repository
    sdesbure/T411Torznab:
        Fatal: Invalid repository found.  Only lowercase is allowed

seim's Repository
    seafileltd/seafile:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]

Selfhosters Unraid Discord Repository
    nmtan/chevereto:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config
    anojht/invoiceninja:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/
    sharelatex/sharelatex:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config
    syncarr/syncarr:
        No Icon specified within the application template

Siwat2545's Repository
    siwatinc/adguard_home:
        Unknown category DNS:
        No Registry entry set.  Created from Repository setting
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config
    siwatinc/esphomeyaml:
        No Registry entry set.  Created from Repository setting
    machinebox/facebox:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config
    siwatinc/home_assistant_control_panel_unraid_ab:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]
    siwatinc/nginx-pagespeed:
        No Registry entry set.  Created from Repository setting
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/
    onlyoffice/communityserver:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]
    onlyoffice/documentserver:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]
    siwatinc/phlex:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]
    siwatinc/ubuntu-playground:
        Not a valid Registry entry set.  Creating from Repository setting

smdion's beta Repository
    smdion/docker-keybox:
        No Icon specified within the application template

smdion's Repository
    smdion/docker-h5ai:
        Invalid WebUI

snoopy86's Repository
    snoopy86/emoncms-docker:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.  Entry changed to http://[IP]:[PORT:80]/

stuckless' Repository
    stuckless/crushftp:
        Unknown category Productivity:Tools
        Multiple Icons found

thetarkus' Repository
    thetarkus/funkwhale:
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config
        No Support Link Present

thomast_88's Repository
    gitlab/gitlab-runner:
        No category entry present
        Blacklisted: Obvious CA conversion templates are disallowed

ulisses1478's Repository
    ulisses1478/docker-android:
        No category entry present
        No Registry entry set.  Created from Repository setting
        No Support Link Present
    ulisses1478/bitcoinwallet-gui:
        No Support Link Present
    ulisses1478/mongo-express:
        No Registry entry set.  Created from Repository setting
        No Support Link Present
    phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin:
        No Support Link Present
    ulisses1478/shinobi:
        No Support Link Present
    ulisses1478/zcashwallet:
        No Support Link Present

zyphermonkey's Repository
    zyphermonkey/splunk:
        No Support Link Present

_DC_'s Repository
    jc5x/firefly-iii:latest:
        No category entry present
        Port referenced in webUI does not correspond with a container port defined.Port Referenced does not exist in Config
        No Support Link Present

April 26, 2020

5 minutes ago, PSYCHOPATHiO said:

@FoxxMDwhats wrong with all shoginn dockers, cant update or re-download them anymore

Because

On 4/24/2020 at 11:42 AM, daves said:

It looks like shoginn has pulled most of his projects from dockerhub

They're now being removed from CA and a notice will go out via FCP

March 21, 2020

15 minutes ago, BEE said:

Whats happened to Cups in Community Applications?

Removed due to zero support, no updates in 3 years+, fundamentally very limited drivers included that would work on an ancient printer that isn't commonly available nowadays and far far better alternatives to what was available within CA by enabling Docker Hub Searches within CA and then searching for CUPS. IE: Not much point in keeping an app within CA that for the most part doesn't work as advertised.

https://forums.unraid.net/topic/37549-support-gfjardims-docker-repository/page/14/?tab=comments#comment-827842

Review the last page or 2 of the linked content to see some of the examples of alternatives that actually work.

March 20, 2020

And, unlike the other F@H app, it won't automatically join Team unRaid (quite understandable). The team # if you care is 227802

image.png.5dbeac5be8f888b1c94f4afd7454e87f.png

March 14, 2020

For the next little while, the moderators of CA will try and keep those two applications on the main landing page of CA (New Apps) to gain some further exposure

March 8, 2020

3 hours ago, L0rdRaiden said:

This just mean that a new category has been added or are there new security options for dockers? where are they?

webgiu: dockerMan: Security enhancement

Both (Security as a category being added was listed as a separate entity).

So far as the security enhancement was concerned, it was previously possible for a malicious template author (ie: an asshole) to craft a template for a docker container that would either

Arbitrarily execute code directly on the server simply by loading the template or
Completely hide a path mapping from the user even if template authoring mode was enabled in Settings - Docker

This code change simply brought dockerMan up to speed with what Community Applications already does for those 1 or 2 users that still add in repositories via the Template Repositories tab (ugh) instead of utilizing the Apps Tab. CA goes medieval in it's enforcement of any violation of security

Quote

Any violation of the security policies enforced by CA and the associated application feed results in automatic blacklisting of an author's entire template repository. No warnings and no exceptions.

March 2, 2020

10 minutes ago, jonathanm said:

Over and over we tell people to click on the support link in the container instead of posting questions to the general forum, but there isn't an unraid support thread linked to the template in question.

There is no requirement that the support thread be hosted here and cannot be pointed at the app's own thread. Probably the majority of questions regarding any given app aren't actually applicable to the unRaid installation, but are rather application specific questions. On the face of it based upon the title of this thread (Slow Uploads), I'd call that app specific.

But that is rather immaterial as it is semantics.

Personally, I'd love for every single app to have a dedicated support thread per app. In practice, its not going to happen.

Where and how the support threads are hosted and what I am able to discern about any given support level does however highly impact any moderation that may (or may not) one day be required on.

February 28, 2020

I think that I'm going to remove CUPS from CA. It's one of those abandoned applications. While it does somewhat work, it's not particularly populated with printer drivers that are more commonly used today, and there are many more choices for CUPS available @ dockerHub that are kept more up to date and have a better selection of drivers within them.

February 23, 2020

My understanding is that the author(s) of organizr themselves have deprecated the original and it is now advised to switch to v2 of the application. Hence the linuxserver app of organizr is now deprecated. There is the official version of organizr-v2 available within the Apps Tab. And no, I have no idea about the procedure (if any) involved in switching over your existing data to the updated app.

This does not mean that you HAVE to switch. Even if you don't switch, this app will still be available within the apps tab if you have previously installed it and need to reinstall it via the previous apps section

NEW installations of this app are blocked by default by the Apps Tab.

February 16, 2020

Just now, DarphBobo said:

Why not recommend the official version? Wouldn't the official container be the way to go?

Because based upon support requests here in the forum and activity of the OP of the thread, you can reasonably expect no support via the official channels here in this forum regarding any unRaid specific issues.

The support on the whole for emby via their own forum / discord / whatnot may be amazing, but my recommendations are based upon support you can get here. And it's purely a personal opinion...

February 16, 2020

7 hours ago, Derek_ said:

(this one, one from Emby themselves, and Binhex)

At the heart of it, there is no fundamental difference. ie: Emby is emby is emby.

Difference lies in some subtleties. and as @jonathanm stated support regarding hardware transcoding.

lsio issues updates for the containers if the base OS has an update (security patch), or emby get's updated pretty much the minute that it happens.

binhex issues updates for the containers whenever the arch upstream repository for emby gets updated (which will lag behind the actual updates)

emby issues updates for the containers whenever they release a new stable version (ie: 2 months ago) or if you installed the beta version 2 days ago. No clue about their security policies.

If you're going to be using the nVidia plugin, you're definitely going to want to run the lsio version, as it'll at least be tested with the nvidia hardware transcoding. Everything else probably only supports intel GPU transcoding if you passthrough the appropriate commands and have a compatible (ie: older iGPU)

All else being equal and if you're not doing hardware transcoding, you're looking at either lsio or @binhex

ie: Long story short, you're not the first to ask this type of question (although usually it's about Plex), CA has this policy

Quote

In the situations where there is already a multitude of certain applications available (ie: Plex, nzbGet, Radarr, etc) new submissions of those applications will not be accepted.

February 16, 2020

I was actually concerned that br0 wasn't available by default, but since it is this isn't really that big a deal

February 16, 2020

Does this have to run on it's own IP??? Would it be better to have the default for the template set to be bridge with the appropriate ports mapped through?

February 15, 2020

6 minutes ago, izarkhin said:

how do I proceed with figuring out which docker contains malware?

Stop one at a time and see when the traffic to "weird sites" stops.

February 11, 2020

Nothing says you can't run ps3netsrv. Only that mccloud/ps3netsrv now will install cryptomining software. AFAIK there are other ps3netsrv's available on dockerHub that will work fine for you (enable dockerHub searches within the apps tab)

February 10, 2020

mccloud/ps3netsrv and mccloud/ps3netsrv:latest will have a warning go out via FCP regarding its infection with crypto mining software.

However, it should be noted that this apparent breach of mccloud's GitHub repo happened in and around 10 hours ago today.

PS3Netsrv has NOT been available within Community Applications for a while now, as the tags utilized by the templates within CA were no longer available to be downloaded. At that point, all of the users of the previous tags for ps3netsrv (:alpine, :debian, etc) were also notified via Fix Common Problems that the containers were blacklisted because of the tags no longer being available.

At no point has the :latest tag with regards to ps3netsrv from McCloud ever been available within CA as the template maintainer never updated the templates to reflect the new tags. (The :latest tag is the one with the crypto mining software)

While this breach doesn't affect any applications that are available within Community Applications (Apps), the moderators of CA take very seriously the security and integrity of the applications present within.

February 2, 2020

done

February 2, 2020

FWIW, the app from linux server is set up correctly...

A PR has been issued against the template to fix this. If not accepted within a reasonable time (since the template maintainer has not been online for months), then this particular version will be removed from CA in favour of the one from linuxserver.

dockerPolice

Posts

Joined

Last visited

Content Type

Profiles

Forums

Downloads

Store

Gallery

Bug Reports

Documentation

Landing

Posts posted by dockerPolice

[Support] Linuxserver.io - WebGrab+Plus

Hotio v CA

[Support] Linuxserver.io - Pydio-Cells

[Support] Linuxserver.io - Pydio-Cells

[Support] Linuxserver.io - digiKam

[Support] Linuxserver.io - SWAG - Secure Web Application Gateway (Nginx/PHP/Certbot/Fail2ban)

[Support] Linuxserver.io - SWAG - Secure Web Application Gateway (Nginx/PHP/Certbot/Fail2ban)

Docker Template Errors

[Support] FoxxMD - shoginn-dump1090

[Plug-In] Community Applications

[Support] Linuxserver.io - Folding@home

Help Take the Fight to COVID-19 with BOINC and Folding@home

Unraid OS version 6.8.3 available

Duplicacy - Slow Upload

[support] gfjardim's Docker Repository

[Support] Linuxserver.io - Organizr

[Support] Linuxserver.io - Emby

[Support] Linuxserver.io - Emby

[Support] knex666 - OpenProject

[Support] knex666 - OpenProject

Unauthorized web traffic from unRAID IP

[DOCKER] ps3netsrv

[DOCKER] ps3netsrv

[support] VSCode Community Application

[support] VSCode Community Application