Everything posted by m0t0k0
-
Running Out Of Room On Flash Drive 6.9.2
My 4GB Flash drive has 656MB written. So running out even on a 2GB dosent sound right. Somthing must be writing into that drive. Maybe make a fresh unraind install on anthoer flash drive and the compere the two?
-
Array stuck " Array Stopping•Warning: posix_kill() expects parameter 1 to be int, string given in /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/ca.backup2/scripts/killRsync.php on line 27"
So I was following the guide to shrink the array using the "Clear Drive Then Remove Drive" Method. I got to the end of step 8 click done and the stop the array. But the stopping brocess has hung with the error at the bottom of the screen reading Array Stopping•Warning: posix_kill() expects parameter 1 to be int, string given in /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/ca.backup2/scripts/killRsync.php on line 27 Now I can do anything cant even shutdown. Any help would be very welcome universe-diagnostics-20220421-1935.zip
-
Unassigned Devices - Managing Disk Drives and Remote Shares Outside of The Unraid Array
Hmm yes could be. I did not think there would be that much logic on the board. Maybe unraid is remebering the drive as one that was dissconnected? Like when I remove a drive from the array and add it back unraid knows where is goes. Maybe I can make unraid forget about the old drive and detect it a new?
-
Unassigned Devices - Managing Disk Drives and Remote Shares Outside of The Unraid Array
I applogise if this has been covered in the past but I was unable to find anything. I had a 12TB USB HDD which was mounted through unassigned devices, it has now been shucked and made its way into the array. The disk it replaced a 3TB HDD has nolw made it into the old USB enclosure and I would like to mount it as an unassigned device. How ever as you can see from the attached photo altho it is reconised as being 3TB when I format it the old 12TB disks partition magicly appers. Im unable to use the drive and it sayd it is a full 12TB partition. How can I rectifiy it please? I have tried delting the partion and re-formatting and I still get the same result. Thanks universe-diagnostics-20220415-1216.zip
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Nextcloud
I have an issue on Unraid. I tried to upadte the app from witin nextcloud and it goit stuck in maitance mode. I tried using occ but that gives the following error root@7dbf3a08b34e:/# sudo -u abc php /config/www/nextcloud/occ maintenance:mode --off Nextcloud or one of the apps require upgrade - only a limited number of commands are available You may use your browser or the occ upgrade command to do the upgrade Maintenance mode disabled root@7dbf3a08b34e:/# sudo -u abc php /config/www/nextcloud/occ upgrade Nextcloud or one of the apps require upgrade - only a limited number of commands are available You may use your browser or the occ upgrade command to do the upgrade Setting log level to debug Turned on maintenance mode Updating database schema Updated database Updating <mail> ... An unhandled exception has been thrown: ArgumentCountError: Too few arguments to function OCA\Mail\Migration\ProvisionAccounts::__construct(), 0 passed in /config/www/nextcloud/lib/private/Repair.php on line 122 and exactly 1 expected in /config/www/nextcloud/apps/mail/lib/Migration/ProvisionAccounts.php:37 Stack trace: #0 /config/www/nextcloud/lib/private/Repair.php(122): OCA\Mail\Migration\ProvisionAccounts->__construct() #1 /config/www/nextcloud/lib/private/legacy/OC_App.php(1035): OC\Repair->addStep() #2 /config/www/nextcloud/lib/private/legacy/OC_App.php(979): OC_App::executeRepairSteps() #3 /config/www/nextcloud/lib/private/Updater.php(375): OC_App::updateApp() #4 /config/www/nextcloud/lib/private/Updater.php(254): OC\Updater->doAppUpgrade() #5 /config/www/nextcloud/lib/private/Updater.php(130): OC\Updater->doUpgrade() #6 /config/www/nextcloud/core/Command/Upgrade.php(255): OC\Updater->upgrade() #7 /config/www/nextcloud/3rdparty/symfony/console/Command/Command.php(255): OC\Core\Command\Upgrade->execute() #8 /config/www/nextcloud/3rdparty/symfony/console/Application.php(1000): Symfony\Component\Console\Command\Command->run() #9 /config/www/nextcloud/3rdparty/symfony/console/Application.php(271): Symfony\Component\Console\Application->doRunCommand() #10 /config/www/nextcloud/3rdparty/symfony/console/Application.php(147): Symfony\Component\Console\Application->doRun() #11 /config/www/nextcloud/lib/private/Console/Application.php(215): Symfony\Component\Console\Application->run() #12 /config/www/nextcloud/console.php(100): OC\Console\Application->run() #13 /config/www/nextcloud/occ(11): require_once('/config/www/nex...') #14 {main}root@7dbf3a08b34e:/#
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Emby
I have the same problem. I tried going onto beta as suggested in the tread but it still wont work. Please can someone look at this I cant watch anything
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Sonarr
I noticed today Sonarr is unable to contact SABnzbd. I don't know how long it has been like this maybe a couple of weeks max. I have both Sonarr and Radarr setup the same, Radarr no problem. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated. Here is what seems to be the relevant bit from the debug log. [v2.0.0.5322] NzbDrone.Core.Download.Clients.DownloadClientException: Unable to connect to SABnzbd, please check your settings ---> NzbDrone.Common.Http.HttpException: HTTP request failed: [404:NotFound] at [http://192.168.10.10:8081/362fc1c25a55321d74dbc8415e95400f/api?mode=addfile&cat=sonarr&priority=-100&apikey=(removed)&output=json] at NzbDrone.Common.Http.HttpClient.Execute (NzbDrone.Common.Http.HttpRequest request) [0x00133] in C:\BuildAgent\work\5d7581516c0ee5b3\src\NzbDrone.Common\Http\HttpClient.cs:100 at NzbDrone.Core.Download.Clients.Sabnzbd.SabnzbdProxy.ProcessRequest (NzbDrone.Common.Http.HttpRequestBuilder requestBuilder, NzbDrone.Core.Download.Clients.Sabnzbd.SabnzbdSettings settings) [0x0001d] in C:\BuildAgent\work\5d7581516c0ee5b3\src\NzbDrone.Core\Download\Clients\Sabnzbd\SabnzbdProxy.cs:184 --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at NzbDrone.Core.Download.Clients.Sabnzbd.SabnzbdProxy.ProcessRequest (NzbDrone.Common.Http.HttpRequestBuilder requestBuilder, NzbDrone.Core.Download.Clients.Sabnzbd.SabnzbdSettings settings) [0x0002d] in C:\BuildAgent\work\5d7581516c0ee5b3\src\NzbDrone.Core\Download\Clients\Sabnzbd\SabnzbdProxy.cs:188 at NzbDrone.Core.Download.Clients.Sabnzbd.SabnzbdProxy.DownloadNzb (System.Byte[] nzbData, System.String filename, System.String category, System.Int32 priority, NzbDrone.Core.Download.Clients.Sabnzbd.SabnzbdSettings settings) [0x00048] in C:\BuildAgent\work\5d7581516c0ee5b3\src\NzbDrone.Core\Download\Clients\Sabnzbd\SabnzbdProxy.cs:55 at NzbDrone.Core.Download.Clients.Sabnzbd.Sabnzbd.AddFromNzbFile (NzbDrone.Core.Parser.Model.RemoteEpisode remoteEpisode, System.String filename, System.Byte[] fileContent) [0x0002d] in C:\BuildAgent\work\5d7581516c0ee5b3\src\NzbDrone.Core\Download\Clients\Sabnzbd\Sabnzbd.cs:41 at NzbDrone.Core.Download.UsenetClientBase`1[TSettings].Download (NzbDrone.Core.Parser.Model.RemoteEpisode remoteEpisode) [0x00179] in C:\BuildAgent\work\5d7581516c0ee5b3\src\NzbDrone.Core\Download\UsenetClientBase.cs:79 at NzbDrone.Core.Download.DownloadService.DownloadReport (NzbDrone.Core.Parser.Model.RemoteEpisode remoteEpisode) [0x00191] in C:\BuildAgent\work\5d7581516c0ee5b3\src\NzbDrone.Core\Download\DownloadService.cs:76 at NzbDrone.Core.Download.ProcessDownloadDecisions.ProcessDecisions (System.Collections.Generic.List`1[T] decisions) [0x000d9] in C:\BuildAgent\work\5d7581516c0ee5b3\src\NzbDrone.Core\Download\ProcessDownloadDecisions.cs:76
- Polaris-10
-
Share Your Banners
Thanks, dude. I think its actually a Polaris GPU die but GPUs in unRAID systems is on the rise
-
Share Your Banners
-
SSDs as array drives question
I think the question is why would I want to use SSDs as array drives? The array is designed to give you a large, cheap, protected, storage space. SSDs are not large well not the cheap ones anyway TRIM would mess with the already calculated parity so you would lose protection (maybe there is a way around this) SSDs are good for speedy data access but if your accessing you array over gigabit ethernet a decent HDD will saturate this (on reads at least anyway as these is a slight slowdown when writing due to parity being calculated/written You would probably be better off building an array to protect your archived (does not change very often) data and then having a protected cache made up of SSDs you can assign shares to live on just the cache drive so you would have the benefit of speed and avoid the problems of having SSDs in your array