Everything posted by dsmith44
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
DO NOT USE - SEE FIRST PAGE This docker container is deprecated This is now fixed, but this is the last ever update. SIX MONTHS FROM NOW DOCKER HUB IMAGES WILL BE REMOVED
-
10G and Samba
I realise I am not the first person to post on this topic, though I've done quite a bit of work to narrow down where my issue is, and found an almost complete solution, so perhaps this will be helpful to others. ----------------------------------------------------------------- I recently upgraded to 10G networking between Unraid and my PC. Unraid is running on Proxmox ( Ryzen 5900X 128GB Ram ) as a 12 Core - 32GB VM. Direct pass through of 2x1TB Western Digital NVME and HBA for drives. Cache on NVME drives is a zpool mirror. VirtIO networking. PC to Unraid - iperf3 - 9.4Gb/s all day every day. Tick, network is working fine. Jumbo frames and I will get to 9.8Gb/s. This is testing from a WSL instance on PC to Unraid VM. Given virtualisation at both ends I am very happy with this and does a good job of validating everything is running nicely. Unraid onto cache NVMe drives tested with fio gives 200-2000 MB/s performance, average 1200 MB/s. Perhaps a bit lower than native drives but that's fine. This is also using fuse so excludes that as a cause I would think. Saving files to a cache share using Samba and it'll max out at about 480MB/s, which on the face of the the other tests I would hope to get closer to full wire speed. It's very stable at 480MB/s. smbd seems to top out at 70% of one core, so as single thread on that basis I perhaps could expect 700MB/s or so at max anyway. I was going to end my post with the following lines but then I had one final idea. I checked the CPU governor mode on Proxmox, I vaguely remembered setting it to powersave. I changed this back to performance using echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor If you aren't running in a VM you can now set this in the settings page in version 7. This instantly increased throughput to 800MB/s ! The ondemand governor also performs similarly, and that's what I'm going to leave it on, don't need to be running at full speed when there is nothing to do. At that point I'm reasonably happy, unless anyone has any ideas for the last 200MB or so.
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
@EDACerton has suggested to me that his template that uses the official docker container becomes the replacement for my container. I think this is a good idea, and thank you. We'll work together to test/document cut over and then I'll update the instructions for this to reference his.
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
Hello everyone. At this point I want to step back from supporting this docker container, I don't use it personally at all. That was clear with the recent update that I just pushed without testing it at all, sorry but as I said I don't use this and have no interest in it anymore. For 99%+ of people the plugin is better and should be used. For the 1% of people doing odd things, you have some choices to make. Some of you take over the management of this, it's easy, run a script, push to docker hub I'l work with you and good folk at Unraid on how to best manage the transition as I have no idea You individually use the script to build your own images Something else - ideas on a postcard I'm going to put a date of the end of June for the last updates I will push to this, so after that unless someone wants to pick this up it will go stale at that point.
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
Please use the plugin instead. This is only for specialist use cases now.
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
1.64.0 == 1.64 == latest
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
Please check that the plugin isn't a better fit for you. This is only really for specialised use cases at this point.
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
1.62.1 = 1.62 = latest
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
1.60.1 = 1.60 = latest
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
latest = 1.58.2 = 1.58
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
This is the support thread for the docker container not the plugin. I think you want to be here http:// /topic/136889-plugin-tailscale/
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
1.58.2 == 1.58 == latest
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
latest == 1.56.1 == 1.56 is now available
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
At this point @plantsandbinary I would stop using this and install the plugin instead. This is really for special used cases using docker and private networks only now. I would also try using ip addresses only to exclude dns issues in the first instance for troubleshooting. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
1.54.1 has been pushed and latest updated to this version
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
1.52.1 has been pushed. Latest to be tagged later. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
1.50.1 = 1.50 = latest
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
Please use the plugin. This is only for use in specialist cases now. However there is nothing to automatically log you in provided by tailscale so issue will be elsewhere.
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
1.48.1 has been pushed, latest will be tagged in a week or so
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
Hi. I have updated the top of this post to indicate that people should now use the plugin in almost all circumstances. It's just a better user experience for most use cases. I will continue to update this for at least the next six months, and longer of people are using it for reasons that the plugin cannot support such as private docker networks. If you are using it for something else please do let me know in advance. Also if anyone else wants to jump in to help, it's super simple, please let me know. At this point I will not answer any support questions for access to unraid over this container, please use the plugin, it's better, even I'm using it. Well I may asnwer them, just to point people to the plugin. I'd like to thans all those that have helped support people since I set this up, which was initially just because I wanted tailsacle for myself, I wasn't expecting so many people to use it.
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
Let's clear a couple of things up. I have never provided the support for this really, I did this to scratch my own itch when there was no tailscale for unraid. I will continue to update this while it is used. So I haven't changed what I'm doing, I've only ever updated versions. Other kind folk have supported people using it, with occasional input from me if I have time. Now that there is a plugin you are totally within you rights to use that, and indeed I will likely be updating the front page of this to suggest that unless you are using tailscale to do funky fun things with groups of docker containers you probably should.
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
1.46.1 = 1.46 = latest
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
1.44.2 and 1.46.0 are now available latest is pointing at 1.44.2 for now
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
Are you using the plugin or the docker container? You say plug-in. This is for the container not the plug-in
-
[Support] Tailscale Support Thread
The fact that you can ping your client device tailscale address form unraid, but no vica versa suggest ACLs/firewalls. Have you set any custom ACLs in the tailscale admin interface? Have you done anything to unraid with firewalls?