dsmith44

I think the advice provided has fixed this, I see a key and crt file created, however am not sure how to use this feature. Can someone who does please pull deasmi/unraid-tailscale:dev-1.24.2 and try it out. I'd like some people to check this before I promote to latest. Thanks

This is unfortunately a bug, I think, and is open with upstream. https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/4322 Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I am getting the same thing I'm afraid. I have filed a bug report, lets see what they say. https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/4322

There is no logfile saved that I'm aware of, all logs go to stdout as per docker standard - so everything that's logged will be under the 'Logs' menu in unraid if you click on the container name.

1.22.2 = 1.22 = latest new release. Sorry this has been a while.

Dev builds are available. Please see here. https://github.com/deasmi/unraid-tailscale/issues/9 I will probably wait for 1.22.1 before moving latest tag.

Thanks, updated.

I think this shouldwork fine, but will need some command line stuff. I will investigate. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

New release pushed 1.20.2 = 1.20 = latest

I've just tried this on my dev box and If I connect to http://100.x.y.z I get redirected to the default https://servername page If I connect to https://100.x.y.z I do not get redirected and the login page loads Does that work for you? If not you might need to seek help in the general forum, as if the 100.x.y.z address is working tailscale is up and running, and sadly I'm no expert on the redirect functionality.

Yes, thanks, forgot to post an update. As @blaine07 pointed out I've push a build 1.20.1 = 1.20 = latest

I don’t think you can use more than 20 devices without a separate account, and therefore network. You aren’t self hosting either as all the clever stuff is in their cloud. This is just an end point. Running another instance on the same server would therefore be pointless. I think they do have a free multi user as well, I’ve just noticed, bottom of this page. https://tailscale.com/pricing/

1.18.1 has been released and tagged as 1.18.1, 1.18 and latest.

Unless you are doing something funky and giving Docker containers their own IP address it should just work. Are you using the IP address of the tailscale interface, and not the one you see in the console? The links in the console won’t work as they assume you are on the LAN. It’ll start 100.x.x.x. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hello everyone. Tailscale for unraid has become rather more popular than I ever imagined, when I started this it was in the great tradition of scratching my own itch, wanting to access my sever over tailscale. Since then there have been over 250,000 downloads, there are tutorials on youtube, and increasing numbers of requests for new features and support. So I think it might be time to open this up a little bit more and so I have a few asks. Firstly, if you want a new feature, or think you have found a bug please don't post them here - or at least not only here, please create an issue on github if at all possile. https://github.com/deasmi/unraid-tailscale Secondly I'm just one person and while this is a realatively simple thing, it's really just packaging tailscale, using it can get more complicated as new features are always being added. So if you'd like to get involved as a developer or tester for future things please let me know by sending me a DM along with how you'd like to help. Thank you Dean

There isn't to my knowledge, due to what tailscale is trying to do. I think this is by design and there are no options to disable either protocol in the underlying software. It will use any connection it can find to connect to the control plane, ipv4 or ipv6 and ideally both, so that when another host tries to connect it has the best chance of being able to connect. The log lines are totally harmless.

I ran unraid-api in debug mode and got the following, last line repeats forever. Connecting to internal for the first time. ⌨️ INTERNAL:CONNECTING ⌨️ INTERNAL:CONNECTED ☁️ RELAY:CONNECTING <ws> my_servers[4fc0a96c-XXXX-400b-XXXX-9055331fa536] connected. ☁️ RELAY:200:OK:RECONNECTING:NOW ☁️ RELAY:200:OK:RECONNECTING:NOW ☁️ RELAY:200:OK:RECONNECTING:NOW <ws> upc[58c97493-XXXX-40f6-XXXX-219c2d8ce450] connected. 📒 Checking "https://unraiddev.x.y.com" for CORS access. ✔️ Origin check passed, granting CORS! Found API key for my_servers "unraid_XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX" ☁️ RELAY:200:OK:RECONNECTING:NOW ☁️ RELAY:200:OK:RECONNECTING:NOW ☁️ RELAY:200:OK:RECONNECTING:NOW ☁️ RELAY:200:OK:RECONNECTING:NOW ☁️ RELAY:200:OK:RECONNECTING:NOW ☁️ RELAY:200:OK:RECONNECTING:NOW ☁️ RELAY:200:OK:RECONNECTING:NOW ☁️ RELAY:200:OK:RECONNECTING:NOW ☁️ RELAY:200:OK:RECONNECTING:NOW ☁️ RELAY:200:OK:RECONNECTING:NOW

Something isn't happening, as I don't have 'My servers' on the forum header.

No, unraid is running in a VM, but it has its own IP address and there is no proxy, reverse or otherwise, between it and the internet.

Hello. I am looking at this for use with the tailscale container I look after. Link below. The issue is that if you are coming in over a VPN connection all the links will be to the LAN ip address of the server and not the VPN ip address, this breaks them. I wonder is the source to this container on github or elsewhere, I'd be happy to look at adding the feature to rewrite the links and send a pull request if connected via tailscale. Thanks Dean

1.16.2 now released - tagged as 1.16.2 1.16 latest

Shouldn't have said that should I..... 1.16.1 has dropped, pushed and latest updated.

@FoxyNC I had a bit more of a look at this today, and I can see why this would be useful but.... As they say themselves tailscale runs as root, so all files would be written as root if they allowed automatic downloads. It feels inherently a bad idea to allow files to drop with root ownership into a system, which is why you have to approve them currently I feel. Hopefully they'll fix this and support a second userid for file uploads and add options to support that. If/when that happens I'll take a look at this, as while ssh/sftp work fine from a PC/Mac that's not so useful form a mobile device, so I can see the use case here. Edit: I'll keep and eye on this https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/2312

I had no idea this was a thing, and it’s certainly not something that I’d be planning on testing while it’s in alpha. If you are connected to tailscale you can just sftp to the server, or even connect to the actual shares? The instructions for taildrop do also seem to indicate that you have to accept every file on Linux. https://tailscale.com/kb/1106/taildrop/ If this changes at a later date when out of alpha/beta perhaps we’ll revisit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk