NY152

Members
  • Posts

    110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NY152

  1. NY152

    VMs Error

    Hello, When I want to launch a VM, if I do it after another has been launched (still running or not), I get this error: unraid internal error: qemu unexpectedly closed the monitor: qxl_send_events: spice-server bug: guest stopped, ignoring If I restart unraid, I can launch the VM that was causing concern. In fact only the first VM launched works, then you have to reboot. Probably a qemu-related process that remains open? Is there a way to check this so I don't have to reboot every time? Thanks in advance unRAID Version: 6.10.3
  2. Hello, For the past 2 days, the password I set for the GUI months and months ago is no longer recognized. How to reset it because I no longer have access to my transfers Thanks to those who will help me.
  3. Hello, I am a user of the Apache-PHP container but I would like to be able to change some PHP values in its INI file but I don't have access to it. Changing the values in the PHP code does not work (tested with upload_max_filesize without success). Changing values in an .htaccess file doesn't work any better, worse, you get a 500 error. Accessing the container via the console does not work for me on my unRAID server. Thanks for helping me with how to fix my problem.
  4. Personally, sometimes the redirections don't work. A reboot fixes the problem but I would like to understand why it doesn't work after a while. In the logs, I have an error concerning certbot : 2021-05-12 12:05:01,023:DEBUG:certbot._internal.log:Exiting abnormally: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/certbot/bin/certbot", line 8, in <module> sys.exit(main()) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/certbot/main.py", line 15, in main return internal_main.main(cli_args) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/certbot/_internal/main.py", line 1403, in main plugins = plugins_disco.PluginsRegistry.find_all() File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/certbot/_internal/plugins/disco.py", line 237, in find_all plugin_ep = cls._load_entry_point(entry_point, plugins, with_prefix=False) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/certbot/_internal/plugins/disco.py", line 255, in _load_entry_point plugin_ep = PluginEntryPoint(entry_point, with_prefix) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/certbot/_internal/plugins/disco.py", line 51, in __init__ self.plugin_cls: interfaces.IPluginFactory = entry_point.load() File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2461, in load self.require(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2484, in require items = working_set.resolve(reqs, env, installer, extras=self.extras) File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 787, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req, requirers) pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'future<1,>=0' distribution was not found and is required by dns-lexicon 2021-05-12 12:05:01,023:ERROR:certbot._internal.log:An unexpected error occurred: 2021-05-12 12:05:01,023:ERROR:certbot._internal.log:pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'future<1,>=0' distribution was If anyone has a solution, I'm interested Thanks
  5. The argument regarding ransomware (this was still an example) is that if a ransonware attacks file encryption, the source of its files (the original therefore) is deleted in favor of the encrypted version, the recycle bin could be a rampart in the sense that we would recover the original! So limiting access to a defined user would make sense. Placing them elsewhere would perhaps be more logical if we listen to you (Samba rights) although I doubt it because, for example, on a Synology NAS, the recycle bin can be limited to only the administrators of the machine so the thing is quite possible no ?
  6. For security reasons, it might be good to have the possibility to set the access authorization to the recycle bin to a single user (who will be considered as administrator (root for example) of the recycle bin) with which we will not connect by sharing. This would act as a safeguard in the event of compromised security (ransonware for example) You can also think about not storing the recycle bin in the share but in a place not accessible to the share !
  7. Hello, would it be possible to have an option to restrict access to the recycle bin to administrators only (or to selected users)?
  8. Hello, Almost 1 year since the release of the last stable version, it's been a long time. When will we have the privilege of seeing the arrival of v6.9 in stable version?
  9. Hello, I have walked through a little thread regarding accessing the recycle bin! It would be good to offer an option that automatically makes the trash folder and its contents completely inaccessible to the logged in user. Why ? For security purposes ! Imagine that the user is the victim of a virus or ransonware, the files in the recycle bin could save hours of work ^^ This is why the configuration of the recycle bin must be able to be configured (a bit like on Synology's DSM in short)
  10. Afin de fixer certains problèmes de droits dans mon serveur, j'ai tenté d'aller dans Tools > New Permissions Que je ne choisisse qu'un seul disque et / ou partage, j'ai ceci : Rien ne s'affiche, j'aimerai comprendre. J'ai beau laisser ce popup une éternité, rien ne s'y affiche et mes droits sont toujours aux fraises ... J'aimerai ne pas casser les droits de mes partages aussi si quelqu'un aurait la commande permettant de fixer tous les disques et tous les partages en SSH, je prends ^^ D'avancer, merci
  11. Hello, I am using ubooquity docker on my unRAID server and would like to add more directories. Only I don't know how to add more from the docker management interface. Could someone enlighten me? Thank you EDIT : Rights problem, resolved
  12. nginx crashes randomly. This can be found in /var/log/nginx/error.log # cat /var/log/nginx/error.log 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to unix:/var/run/nginx.socket failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to 192.168.0.100:8081 failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to [2a01:e0a:2f6:9220::188b:5653]:8081 failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to unix:/var/run/nginx.socket failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to 192.168.0.100:8081 failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to [2a01:e0a:2f6:9220::188b:5653]:8081 failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to unix:/var/run/nginx.socket failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to 192.168.0.100:8081 failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to [2a01:e0a:2f6:9220::188b:5653]:8081 failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to unix:/var/run/nginx.socket failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to 192.168.0.100:8081 failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to [2a01:e0a:2f6:9220::188b:5653]:8081 failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to unix:/var/run/nginx.socket failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to 192.168.0.100:8081 failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to [2a01:e0a:2f6:9220::188b:5653]:8081 failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: still could not bind() 2020/07/07 21:14:42 [info] 24358#24358: Using 131072KiB of shared memory for nchan in /etc/nginx/nginx.conf:143 2020/07/07 21:14:45 [alert] 8297#8297: *15136 open socket #17 left in connection 9 2020/07/07 21:14:45 [alert] 8297#8297: aborting A little help would be appreciated
  13. So it works ... Almost! When I want to connect to it, I come back to the login page without error message (no bad login or other) Strange ...
  14. I found the problem, ngnix does not launch, it returns this error: nginx: [emerg] cannot load certificate "/etc/ssl/certs/unraid_bundle.pem": BIO_new_file() failed (SSL: error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or directory:fopen('/etc/ssl/certs/unraid_bundle.pem','r') error:2006D080:BIO routines:BIO_new_file:no such file) However, I have a certificate on the USB key. I am looking for ways to correct this error.
  15. Hello, After a long period of trouble, I reached my server and turned it back on a little later. Since then, everything seems to be working except the webgui. Even when starting on the webgui instead of the console, localhost does not work. Internet works, I type my message from the webgui ... Please help me correct this error.
  16. Hello, I hope I have posted the message in the correct category. I look for a box with at least 12 3.5' HDD bays for a new unRAID server. All the references that I find are no longer available or not deliverable in France. Anyone have a recent reference to advise me? Thank you in advance
  17. The fan works however ... I even have several fans and several sensors. The CPU does not exceed 40 ° C, same for my GPUs (the description of the config is in signature) I just restarted it and the server has been running normally for 15 minutes (a parity check has started, let's hope nothing untoward happens during this procedure, with 7 4 TB hard disks (including 2 for parity), it will not take 5 minutes! For the moment, the server is running but I leave the subject open because the situation is still strange and even if the situation seems resolved, it may not be the case. EDIT : The server is still running smoothly ...
  18. The BIOS beep is racing and I have this: general protection fault fffc [# 1] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 2] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 3] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 4] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 5] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 6] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 7] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 8] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 9] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 10] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 11] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 12] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 13] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 14] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 15] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 16] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 17] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 18] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 19] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 20] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 21] SMP PTI No kernel panic this time ...
  19. How to do this without losing the server configuration?
  20. Hello, I just installed the latest update and on reboot, I have this on the screen: Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: vsnprintf+0x4e0/0x4ef Kernel Offset: disabled ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in vsnprintf+0x4e0/0x4ef ]--- So I no longer have access to my server: / I need your help, thanks
  21. I am looking to secure an unraid server with a VPN. What I mainly want is for internet traffic to be cut if the VPN is disconnected (or before it connects) Is it possible ? My VPN is NordVPN Thank you for your help
  22. These are opvn profiles so I do not see what would be wrong configured (especially if only the update of dockers is impacted) In the debug console of my browser, I have this error: POST http://192.168.0.5:8000/plugins/dynamix.docker.manager/include/DockerUpdate.php 504 (Gateway Time-out)
  23. I have access from a Win10 in VM and from ArchLinux in VM too. If I go so far as to say that only Docker Hub is impacted it is because I have no other network-level problem on this server. It's the only worry, really.
  24. And only Docker Hub would be impacted? I doubt. As said above, even my VMs are powered with this VPN connection and without any worries.
  25. I just found the cause ... It comes from my VPN. All this is very counterproductive, if to update the dockers, we must not have a VPN, all this seems to me not very "clean"!