tunetyme

no

Perhaps I am missing a big piece of the issue of an unclean shutdown. A power failure will cause an unclean shutdown. This will create massive parity errors. Does that mean if I lose a data drive in a power failure and parity is now erroneous, I won't be able to reconstruct my damage drive?

That's what happens when you look into the glass of water from the top instead of the sides.

Ask Trurl, I find things that are impossible, I've been driving him crazy for weeks. I think I will need to get a room there, my bar bill in Greensboro will be HUGE...

BTW how do I set this to check for updates (along with other plugins.)

Share S is set for both included (disk2,disk3,disk4,disk5,disk6) and excluded (disk7) disks Share P is set for both included (disk1) and excluded (disk7) disks Cleared these.

After Rescan I thought this would automatically update (rescan) after rebooting the system Warnings Found Suggested Fix Docker Update Check not enabled Recommended to enable update checks for docker applications Ignored Errors & Warnings Suggested Fix Plugin Update Check not enabled Highly recommended to have dynamix check for plugin updates (including for the webUI All Ignored Errors & Warnings Plugin Update Check not enabled Share S is set for both included (disk2,disk3,disk4,disk5,disk6) and excluded (disk7) disks Share P is set for both included (disk1) and excluded (disk7) disks

This is straight from FCP Warnings Found Suggested Fix Share S is set for both included (disk2,disk3,disk4,disk5,disk6) and excluded (disk7,disk8) disks While if you're careful this isn't a problem, there is absolutely no reason ever to specify BOTH included and excluded disks. It is far easier and safer to only set either the included list or the excluded list. Fix it here: Ignored Errors & Warnings Suggested Fix Plugin Update Check not enabled Highly recommended to have dynamix check for plugin updates (including for the webUI All Ignored Errors & Warnings Plugin Update Check not enabled Share S is set for both included (disk2,disk3,disk4,disk5,disk6) and excluded (disk7) disks Share P is set for both included (disk1) and excluded (disk7) disks

Fix Common Problems This only diagnosed the problem my error. It was set under User Shares in the GUI

I certainly tried to make changes from within the plugin

No adjustments and yes they are from the flash drive

As requested, I think you were addressing this request to me. S.cfg P.cfg

Yes, It gives me the warning for both shares P and S. I have rebooted as well. I could put a couple of disks in those to slots and see if that will allow me to "uncheck" those disks, however I have formatted them to be backup disks NTFS. Will that be a problem?

Here are the diagnostics. tower-diagnostics-20170406-1153.zip

Available slots and my disk number are the same number in my system. I forget that I organize things a little differently than most people. The slot number is the disk number so slot number 7 is disk number 7. Now that I have finished the conversions there isn't a disk 7 or 8 in the system.

I have recently upgrades my system from 4.7 to 6.3.2 and have upgraded several disks from 2 to 4TB. Current configuration is: 6 data XFS 1 cache BTRFS 1 parity 2 empty slots disks 7 & 8 (used for preclearing, copying etc. 2 shares P and S I went through the conversion process from rfs to xfs. In that process there was a recommendation to have both include in each plus exclude slots 7 & 8 (disk). I have an error for both shares saying I am including and excluding and to correct this. Both share indicate that neither share is excluding any disks. However it also only shows 6 disks not 8. How can I correct this?

There wasn't a file or directory. I removed the directory from the command line rm -r /mnt/disk3/disk3 The disk3 share is now gone Thank-you

It is empty. The problem is that I can't delete the folder. The folder did not show up on disk3 until I rebooted the server.

Sorry for the delay tree.txt

I am using the command line from th console

That is the display I saw but not clear how to copy and paste to the forum

disk3 shows up under disk3 -S -disk3 user0 -disk3 user -disk3 the "-" is to signify a subdirectory

Regrettably, I rebooted the server. tree /mnt -L 2 This is the recommendation from "Fix Common Problems" While there *may be* (doubtful) valid use cases for having a share named identically to a disk share, this is only going to cause some confusion as if disk shares are enabled, then you will have duplicated share names, and possibly if disk shares are not enabled, then you might not be able to gain access to the share. This is usually caused by moving the contents of one disk to another (XFS Conversion?) and an improperly placed slash. The solution is to move the contents of the user share named disk3 to be placed within a validly named share. Ask for assistance on the forums for guidance on doing this. Under user0 /.. /s /p /disk3 No files or directories under disk3 /mnt/disk3 /s /disk3 No files or directories under disk3

Error can't do a /mnt/disk3/disk3 only able to do /mnt/disk3 on both sides

OK. It just didn't seem right to copy to itself. Thanks for the clarification