b0mb

Members
  • Posts

    116
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by b0mb

  1. I guess so - manually spin down fixes the problem. Any idea for a perm solution? Gesendet von meinem Redmi Note 3 mit Tapatalk
  2. Yes! It´s part of the array but it´s no data written to it yet Just woke my server from S3 May 2 20:41:48 twilightzone s3_sleep: Disk activity on going: sdc May 2 20:41:48 twilightzone s3_sleep: Disk activity detected. Reset timers. May 2 20:42:48 twilightzone s3_sleep: Disk activity on going: sdc May 2 20:42:48 twilightzone s3_sleep: Disk activity detected. Reset timers. All drives of my Array are shown as spundown....hmmmm
  3. Not SSD - SDD [emoji6] Cache drive is indeed a SSD and already excluded... Gesendet von meinem Redmi Note 3 mit Tapatalk
  4. I'm having trouble with latest version of dynamix S3 plugin. It's quite often reporting activity on SDD. But SDD is my only drive that is not used yet and the interface shows that the drives are all spun down. Any advice? Thx! b0mb Gesendet von meinem Redmi Note 3 mit Tapatalk
  5. b0mb

    Driveorder

    Oh! I forgot to mention. I don't have any parity as I don't need one for the data stored within my array. Gesendet von meinem Redmi Note 3 mit Tapatalk
  6. Hi! I'm going to add a new drive to my array today. Can I change the order of the drivers while doing this? For example: I have 3 drives added to my array and want to add drive 4. Can this be drive be added as drive 1 or do I have to add it add drive 4? Thx! b0mb Gesendet von meinem Redmi Note 3 mit Tapatalk
  7. Hi! I use the Dynamix S3 Plugin for putting my system into sleep which is working quite well. I´ve set a delay for "Extra delay after array inactivity" but is this really minutes? I´ve read somewhere that the entry i do there is minutes but sometimes my server goes faster into S3 mode. Does some1 have a tipp for me? Thx! b0mb
  8. Hi! I use the Dynamix S3 Plugin for putting my system into sleep which is working quite well. I´ve set a delay for "Extra delay after array inactivity" but is this really minutes? I´ve read somewhere that the entry i do there is minutes but sometimes my server goes faster into S3 mode. Does some1 have a tipp for me? Thx! b0mb
  9. Thx a lot dude! I love Duplicati
  10. I apologize, i´ve found the problem now... as i´m quite new to unRAID i didn´t recognize the log and how to access it before.... It was some problem withe the .log and .ini file of sabnzbd in appdata folder. After changing the rights everything is working fine
  11. i am not really sure whether this is a problem that only belongs to me or not... i´m using the linuxserver.io dockers quite a time now - in the past on OMV Now all my dockers from linuxserver.io like nzbget, htpc manager or organizr are working like a charm but this sabnzbd container won´t even show me the webinterface...
  12. Hey! Just tried this docker container on latest unraid 6.3.3 but it can´t connect to the web interface. Does some1 have a solution? I tried binhex container which is working well. b0mb
  13. So problem seems to be solved. To be honest i build my new server based on apollo lake j3455 last saturday and i did not use my old OMV system that much... before i had a HP Microserver I´ve put an old 4-Port Gigabitswitch between the server and my fritzbox and everything seems to be fine now.... GiGABiT LAN for around 8 hrs now without any troube
  14. So after waking the server this morning from S3 i have again 1 GBIT and im leeching stable with around 50 MB/S for about half an hour now. I´ve set the dynamix plugin to force GBiT LAN while awaking.... I´ll watch this now and if it turns back i´ll try booting latest linux mint from usb, connect my notebook and change the cable we´ll see ^^
  15. i will try changing the cable tomorrow but it´s really wicked... 100 MBIT => reboot => downloading with 450 MBiT@peak => 100 MBiT hmmmmm btw. the switch the server is connected to is a cable fritz box
  16. Since yesterday i was running OMV on my server and everything was running well.... so i can´t believe the problem is cable related....
  17. what´s really wicked... i started bios update from within the asrock bios (latest one already installed), then i´ve bootet unraid und i had a working Gbit Line.... now after a few minutes it changed to 100 MBiT... that´s really annoying
  18. problem seems to be back... does any1 know how to solve this problem? i´ve never had problems with my connection - started with unraid ^^ Settings for eth0: Supported ports: [ TP MII ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full Supported pause frame use: No Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full Advertised pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Link partner advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full Link partner advertised pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only Link partner advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Speed: 100Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: MII PHYAD: 0 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: on Supports Wake-on: pumbg Wake-on: g Current message level: 0x00000033 (51) drv probe ifdown ifup Link detected: yes Mainboard is a Asrock j3455 itx with realtek LAN. b0mb
  19. Hi! I have an array that consists of 4 disks. I just wanted to add my first share. So what kind of allocation method and split level shall i use? Most kind of my stuff is media like movies and series. I´m also going to install emby docker container. b0mb
  20. It's all good. I've only switched from OMV to Unraid. All so my Realtek onboard NIC is listing 1000 MBit while using ethtool. But autonegotiate sets the connection to 100 MBit. Gesendet von meinem Redmi Note 3 mit Tapatalk
  21. Hi! I'm actually preclearing my drives ski that I can start my unraid trial. The lan connection is actually set to 100 MBit instead of 1 Gbit. What's the best way to change this permanently in unraid? b0mb Gesendet von meinem Redmi Note 3 mit Tapatalk
  22. OK! I´ll start from scratch so its important for me that this will really work.... edit: very nice! thx for info and the screen that says all
  23. My data it's anything else than sensitive so no problem with possible corruption. And you can say 100% that spinning up and down of single drives in an BTRFS formatted array will work? I like the filesystem. Gesendet von meinem Redmi Note 3 mit Tapatalk