Blaze9

Yes, sorry I mean literally just local connections to the server are giving me 10MB/s. If I host a file on nginx and try downloading on a remote network (wifi at friends, or mobile network) it works fine and gives me a fairly fast speed. This has been puzzling me for literally 2-3 years! =(

It can't be network connections. Everything else aside from local file transfers to the array gives me 100MB/s. Downloads using wget, usenet, p2p, etc. Just transferring files to the server locally is giving me slow speeds. All external connections are using my full connection bandwidth

Yes.... That was my first check. Please see post again.

Hey, (warning: sorry for mixing MB/s and Mbps, just didn't want to do a wrong conversion anywhere so I'm just using whatever the product is reporting. Ie if it says 100MB/s I'm not converting that to Mbps, and vice-versa!) I've been testing this extensively. I've transferred files from my laptop (wifi) and desktop (2.5G) to my unraid server on the same internal network, on the same switch, on different switches, on the same vLAN, on different vlans, over the built in WireGuard VPN, any networking change I could do I made. I always get a max of 10MB/s. The eth0/eth1 adaptors on unraid are full gigabit duplex connections. On any P2P/wget/usenet connection on the unraid server gets the full gigabit connection speeds on both up and downloads. I have a network speed tracking docker setup and both upload/download on the server has never dropped below 600Mbps. Even Plex transfers max out at ~80-100MB/s upload when people are streaming 4k content. I've transferred files from laptop/desktop -> unraid and unraid -> laptop/desktop and I always get 10MB/s. Doesn't matter protocol: sFTP transfers, SMB transfers (both Windows and OSX), HTTPs via docker containers (even simple a nginx docker container hosting a test 1GB file), and even iperf3 bidirectional is 10MB/s. Removing Unraid from the equation even on two wifi devices I get over 400Mbps device-to-device (two S22's iperf3) This really sucks when I'm trying to transfer large pictures/videos from my desktop to my server for backing up purposes. Sys Info: Unraid Version: 6.9.2 Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+, Version REV:1.10 Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2630 x2 80GB of ECC RAM 4x 1GB ethernet ports, 2x connected w/ cat6A to new Unifi equipment. Both switch + Unraid showing 1Gb connection. Attaching diagnostics as well. Thank you for everyone for taking a look! (This was happening on an old system too. I transferred to a new supermicro chassis which had existing hardware. On my old motherboard it did the same thing. So i highly doubt it is hardware based... has to be some weird config issue somewhere..) mk4alpha-diagnostics-20220520-2111.zip

Hey ya'll I have a 3 drive cache pool in raid1. All 3 drives are 1TB, I have 1.5TB of usable space. One of my drives (sdg) has given me errors, so I replaced the drive with an identical new ssd (sdd). sdg is still connected as an unassigned drive. When I do a btrfs balance, my logs are still showing entries saying Feb 16 02:24:21 Mk4Alpha kernel: BTRFS info (device sdg1): found 14 extents Feb 16 02:24:22 Mk4Alpha kernel: BTRFS info (device sdg1): relocating block group 10354819727360 flags data|raid1 I'm not sure why? I don't have access right now to the server to disconnect the failing drive. Is that the only way to truly remove the drive? If I bring the array down, is Wireguard still active? That's my only way into the server right now. I tried doing btrfs device delete missing /mnt/cache but this says `ERROR: error removing device 'missing': no missing devices found to remove` And the following is my output for the pool from btrfs root@Mk4Alpha:~# btrfs filesystem show Label: none uuid: 7ed018b8-03ec-408f-b72f-64210d53b1ed Total devices 3 FS bytes used 540.46GiB devid 2 size 931.51GiB used 370.00GiB path /dev/sdf1 devid 3 size 931.51GiB used 368.03GiB path /dev/sdd1 devid 4 size 931.51GiB used 368.03GiB path /dev/sdc1 Thanks! mk4alpha-diagnostics-20220216-0230.zip

Yup, this was the thing. It says xfs - encrypted for some reason. I might have changed it to that a while ago but forgot about it. Set it to regular xfs and deleted my passkey and we're all good now! Thank you

Hey guys, I just upgraded my unraid license to PRO since I added in my 13-15th drives. Once I configured the new array, it said Configuration valid, but START was grayed out. Under start it said in red font to enter a new passphrase for encryption. Is this something required now? I never setup encryption before, and never entered a phrase/file. I just made an insecure decryption file, and used that for now, and everything is working as it was before I added in the new drives (all data/dockers/VMs present).I haven't had the chance to restart yet to see if the encryption was actually set... I'm on 6.8.3 incase that was needed. Thanks!

KINGPIN LET ME BUY YOU A BEER. HOLY SHIT I spent 2-3 hours trying to get my system to boot after adding in a new LSI card. USB just would not boot, even though the BIOS detected my sandisk cruiser as boot drive. Just kept on getting the select boot media message. Bought a new USB, did a whole reinstall of unraid, but nothing. Followed your advice, disabled all boot options for PCIE devices. Not only does it boot, but no more device specific boot options are coming up anymore, so much faster boot too! Dude you rock man, seriously. For people who are gonna browse this: I have a X8DT6, and two LSI SAS cards + a 4 port SATA PCIe card. Disabled 'options ROM' as directed under Advanced UPNP for ALL PCIe slots. I included my GPU (GTX 960) and unraid is still utilizing it properly for plex encoding/decoding without any issues. Only options I kept on were for LAN.

Interesting. I've never turned on advanced view under docker before, but I'm still getting a huge number of these commands running at random points on my server. Is there anything else that can be causing it? Of course I don't really mind since the usage isn't over 5-10%, but I'd like to figure out what the actual issue is!

I agree, I need to try this. I don't have physical access to the machine for a while (1+ week) while I'm away but I think that's the logical last step in seeing if it's anything on my network side (I doubt, but who knows) or if it's the machine itself.

Hey! Thanks for the reply. I didn't mean to sound like I was annoyed that there were no replies previously, I just meant to say that ya I posted before but I didn't get anything so let me try again. 😃 I will need to checkout jumbo frames and see if they are enabled/disabled and go from there! Thanks for the suggestion, I didn't check that out yet. I'll post the diagnostics as soon as possible, not accessible right now. Unraid version is the latest 6.8.x, have not updated to 6.9.2 yet. But honestly this issue has been there since 5.x, I just dealt with it lol. But now I'm ingesting alot of pictures since I'm getting I to photography and it takes way too long to dump my cards. Edit: Just checked jumbo frames in my ubiquity hardware. MTU is at default of 1500, so AFAIK it is disabled.

Hey, I've been testing this extensively. I've transferred files from my laptop (wifi) and desktop (2.5G) to my unraid server on the same internal network, on the same switch, on different switches, on the same vLAN, on different vlans, any networking change I could do I made. I always get a max of 10MB/s. The eth0/eth1 adaptors on unraid are full gigabit duplex connections. On any P2P/wget/usenet connection on the unraid server gets the full gigabit connection speeds on both up and downloads. I have a network speed tracking service setup and both upload/download on the server has never dropped below 600Mbps. I've transferred files from laptop/desktop -> unraid and unraid -> laptop/desktop and I always get 10MB/s. Doesn't matter protocol: sFTP transfers, SMB transfers (both Windows and OSX), HTTPs via docker containers (even simple a nginx docker container hosting a test 1GB file), and even iperf3 bidirectional is 10MB/s. This really sucks when I'm trying to transfer large pictures/videos from my desktop to my server for backing up purposes. Some server info, It's an older server: Supermicro X8DT6 2x Intel X5690 48GB DDR3 ECC memory 1TB cache drive (in RAID1, 2x1TB SSDs) ~50TB storage, 15TB free Ran the diskspeed script and all drives are getting 150MB/s or higher. I've posted before here, and no replies for any solution or even why this is happening. Any further info or if I can provide some additional info to troubleshoot, please let me know!

Bumping this, it's been a while with no replies! Any help appreciated! Sabnzb+, plex, qbt all hit high transfer rates, still only LAN to windows/mac/android file transfers are super slow.

Hy ya'll. I'm getting super slow connections between my MBP/Windows desktops (Desktop is wired, MBP is wireless). Speed tests between server and external network (using speedtest-tracker docker) shows minimum of 850Mbps up and down, so connection between my switch and Unraid is fine. Speed tests between clients (wired) show the same 800/800 connection, and wireless shows around 350-400Mbps up/down so all my connections are not the issue. I'm transferring using SMB shares on both windows and mac. Mounting it with `smb://192.168.99.10` (server's IP). I can access all my shares. I've tried creating a new share on my SSD Cache array and writing to just that from my clients so I skip parity writing. It still doesn't allow for fast transfers. iPerf3 also shows slow transfers, around 5Mbps. All services running on unraid can serve files fast. Plex constantly shows 100Mbps+ connections when I'm streaming a 4k file from Unraid. I can also download at 100MB/s (full gig pipe) when using torrents on qBT on unraid. Running out of options. I use my share to backup my DSLR pics and it's getting quite annoying waiting hours for a single SD card to be backed up... Does anyone have suggestions?

Hey all, Having some issues troubleshooting this one. I have the linuxserver sabNZB docker, and the qbittorrent docker. They both download to the same directory '/mnt/user/Downloads'. I -have- set PUID and PGID to 99/100, and UMASK to 000 for both containers. However, whenever I download something using SAB, the files created don't have proper permissions to be modified by windows/linux machines accessing the drive via SMB. The machines can read the files, but can't move/delete/modify. The files created by qbittorrent's container are fine though(can be deleted/moved/etc), and they both have same permission settings as far as I'm aware. I have to run docker safe new permissions in order to allow windows/linux machines to move them. Has anyone run into this before? Any suggestions?