gacpac

Members
  • Posts

    669
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by gacpac

  1. 23 minutes ago, gacpac said:

    Hi, 

     

    I keep getting a similar error in windows server 2019. For whatever reason i cannot install smbDirect meaning smb2.0 and 3.0. And this is a VM in unraid. I've been going through the nic card path and it seems this forum has other workarounds with group policy that technically i don't need because im using my laptop with windows 10 and windows 11 pro just fine?

    Wow so this worked for me. i'm sure it wasn't that way and well it probably shouldn't be. I have all my shares secured so you need a username and password to access them, besides my downloads/garbage pile. I'll send a support ticket just for research and they can take it with a grain of salt for improvement.  

     

  2. Hi, 

     

    I keep getting a similar error in windows server 2019. For whatever reason i cannot install smbDirect meaning smb2.0 and 3.0. And this is a VM in unraid. I've been going through the nic card path and it seems this forum has other workarounds with group policy that technically i don't need because im using my laptop with windows 10 and windows 11 pro just fine?

  3. People who might have had issues with rust desk. I couldn't connect remotely to somehwre outside the network. My solution was to create a custom dns override in pfsense to point rustdesk.mydomain.com to my local unraid server.

    That way outside and inside have the same names. Quite interesting didn't think it will matter.

    Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

  4. I'm using the appdata backup plugin, so when the backup runs it goes to a folder with all the dockers. Is there a way I can either set it to a separate folder or maybe in the duplicati forum filter to only backup plex

    Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

  5. 4 minutes ago, ich777 said:

    I would recommend that you read the documentation, especially this section.

     

    For Windows you can make a executable like linked above, but yes, that's how it's supposed to be done, you can also start the server without a key so to speak to let anyone connect to the server but that's up to you.

    the first time that started without the key it didn't work at all, that was my mistake. But well I'm fine with manually adding devices with key :)

     

    Question, after the key gets generated i assume i should edit the docker and add it in there in case i have to redo the docker or something happens, right?

  6. 41 minutes ago, ich777 said:

    Me too.... What keeps crashing? Did you change anything in the template?

    A bit more information would be really helpful.

     

    No, this is not the commercial version this is the version for private use.

    What does the log say?

    I sort of figured it out i kept looking for a a web gui in the docker. And for logs well i wiped the whole docker and started from scratch and it worked this time. 

     

    Also installed the client and manually added the host settings and key. It that how is supposed to work all the time? 

  7. 5 hours ago, ich777 said:

    Are you using Unraid? If yes, just use the template as is and it will work, you don't need to pass through any other variables, everything is preconfigured and nothing needed.

     

    The default configuration will work OOB:

    grafik.thumb.png.1bfb8c1b11f45564ef0baf59352b13bd.png

    ("--key _" ensures that your server requires clients to use the key which is generated on first start)

     

     

    Please also keep in mind my container is not the one that you've linked since my container contains both the Server and Relay.

    I'm so confused with my setup i just added it and not sure how to get anything else. it keeps crashing 

  8. On 11/25/2023 at 10:38 PM, BVD said:

     

    I think what you're experiencing is Confirmation Bias. And you sort of side-stepped my point, but that's alright, we can run with it -

     

    Yes, a good number of people want VM snapshots and backups in the UI (and absolutely, it'd be a valuable feature) - no, it's not all, nor even a majority (as we can tell from the poll results here). When it comes to unraid user engagement, reddit is a ghostland compared to these forums. VM backups are quantifiably less desired by the unraid user base than... Well, multiple arrays in this case. 

     

    I'd argue that the 'biggest reason' people move to virtualize unraid is actually two separate reasons - if you read through the history of this forum, the years of posts that've come through within that time, there are two recurring themes:

    1. The handling of licensing is *extremely* annoying - having to effectively 'turn off my NAS' to replace or add a drive is utterly absurd. And worse, now that ZFS is 'included', you have to shut down everything in order to do any work on it as well. Any NAS OS should be able to remain online for anything short of a (non-media) hardware failure, or an OS update. This is a pretty huge failure in design IMO.
    2. Having to work around all the various "unraid-isms" - if you want to make anything persistent, it takes a bunch of extra steps to do so, steps that are unnecessary on (literally anything else). Even simple things like keeping your bash history, installing a package, they're all so unnecessarily complicated that folks effectively 'graduate' to another OS. Used to be any user could easily recompile the kernel after installing whatever packages they might find useful to them, now you have this location you have to put the package, and wait for unraid to re-install it each time you reboot. More down time (see licensing above). Just a million little cuts like this.

     

    In the last 6 months, all of 9k people have downloaded the macinabox image - across all of dockerhubs users, not just unraid. This isn't as common as you seem to be alluding to. In 4 years, it's had ~2.5m pulls, again, across all of dockerhub - how many of those are folks updating to a new image? Or pulling another copy on another machine?

     

    What percentage of docker users are also unraid users?

     

    If you can show me verifiable numbers that say otherwise, I'm absolutely open to them, and my apologies in advance if so; I just don't believe unraid users running macos in a vm alongside a windows vm is nearly as common as those simply running windows machines, especially given the OS's target audience.

     

     As for corporate doublespeak... Lol? I don't know how to respond to this honestly, and I don't mean to be rude here, it just feels more like someone lashing out than working to justify their position in a logical and reasoned way...? I don't have a horse in this race  🤷‍♂️

    I read your comment still doesn't make it less important, VM enhancements probably don't bother you as much, but that's you Sr. Everyone else in this only post likes to be able to do something as basic as a snapshot

    • Thanks 1
  9. 10 hours ago, SimonF said:

    In this file has the PCI devices to be bound to vfio.

     

    root@computenode:~# cat /boot/config/vfio-pci.cfg
    BIND=0000:03:00.0|8086:56a0 0000:05:00.0|8086:56a 0000:05:01.0|8086:56a0
    root@computenode:~# 

     

    On my system 05:01.0 does not exist so my VMs do not auto start. So I would need to remove this. Also the vendor:product is in correct.

     

    Take a note of your devices in tools->system devices. 

     

    Make a change to the checked devices save and then set how you want this will update the file in /boot.

     

    So I unchecked group 20 saved, added in group 20 and now my file looks like this

     

    root@computenode:~# cat /boot/config/vfio-pci.cfg
    BIND=0000:03:00.0|8086:56a0root@computenode:~# 

     

    Changes do not take effect until a reboot.

     

    image.png

     

     

     

    Thanks, i'll review and report back if i have issues

  10. Oh wow, it's really been while since i posted. Anyhow, i started having issues with my privoxy, although I think i'm the only one using it lol. I'm getting this problem and I know for sure nobody else is using port 8118

     

    image.thumb.png.0dff1aff6a678bfbf165d93cb7dc7ac1.png

     

    I'll troubleshoot and see what my findings are. Maybe is time to get a fresh template from the CA? I've had this running since day one, and now most of the settings are persistent. 

  11. Maybe someone already had this happen, I want to be able to backup to the cloud my backups, which granted i can simply tell the folder in duplicati backup /mnt/user/appdatabackup my problem is that i keep 3 copies and i only want to backup the last one which is 13gb. How can i go about doing that?

  12. 1 hour ago, ChatNoir said:

    From what I understand there will also be the possibility to have single ZFS drives in the Array.

    That would work the same way as XFS or single BTRFS Array drives.

     

     

    That I'm in for. I'm sure there's benefits simply not sure what I get.