Froberg

Maybe use something like nginx proxy manager to pass through to it. Assuming you have static IP and a domain of course.

So yeah, I'm currently running an Avoton board, the ASRock Rack C2750d4i. It's treated me fairly well, but it's getting on in age and I've just made an investment in two new rack-mount server cabinets so everything is due for a rotation. I want to use the avoton board for my backup server, to replace a "temporary", now going on two years, Celeron based solution, due to the extremely low power consumption, and get something with just a bit more oomph for daily operations. Running Plex is my primary use, but I also have owncloud and a few other services running. Essentially I'm hoping for more snappyness overall. Most of my equipment can do direct-play so transcoding isn't a huge priority. I've looked over what's available but it quickly becomes tricky to find hardware when you have some specific needs. IPMI is a must. I'm too used to it by now, and it's come in handy once or twice. Dual NIC's. I am using gigabit at home still, but future proofing won't hurt me. I would prefer ECC memory. Performance per watt is a factor. Specifically I'd prefer some direct recommendations from other UnRaid users, for obvious reasons, so hit me up! 🙂

Flash stick creation aside, it's entirely likely you'll never want to use anything else ever again. (famous last words) I even have two licenses now. I have tried everything else out there. UnRaid, by and large, just works. As for USB. 2.0 is basically required, as is a low capacity drive like 2-8GB in size as preferred. Quality drive, too. Other than that, yes, they really need to fix this utility.

I really fear this is causing a hindrance for some people who are new to UnRaid.

That would be exactly how my own nextcloud container is running. Not sure how you'd get it to do that in the first place. Maybe it's a nextcloud config issue. i set up sub.tld.dom for mine and it works just fine.

This. UnRaid for me is a lesson in the KISS principle. (Keep It Simple, Stupid) I work in IT but I like using UnRaid at home, because of it's simplicity and it's ability to just keep functioning. I've tightened up the security, of course, but it's excellent for my limited home needs and I only have one docker exposed to the internet through nginx proxy manager for phone-backup purposes. It works wonderfully, it's been more stable than anything I've run at home previously and it runs on a shoebox, as my backup box can attest. I actually just built the backup box to buy another unraid license to support the developers. I keep recommending it to absolutely everyone - and I really appreciate the transparency about these security issues, and also the willingness to discuss why certain choices are made. It makes you trustworthy, so keep it up.

Mine's up at http://x.x.x.x:9091/transmission/web/ I did not modify it from the default afaik.

So the container, for me, is broken right now. Web interface never loads, log indicates this: To support LSIO projects visit: https://www.linuxserver.io/donate/ ------------------------------------- GID/UID ------------------------------------- User uid: 99 User gid: 100 ------------------------------------- [cont-init.d] 10-adduser: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 30-config: executing... [cont-init.d] 30-config: exited 0. [cont-init.d] 99-custom-files: executing... [custom-init] no custom files found exiting... [cont-init.d] 99-custom-files: exited 0. [cont-init.d] done. [services.d] starting services [services.d] done. 2020-05-27 18:16:24 INFO MAIN :: [918cfe7] Broken providers found: [''] 2020-05-27 18:16:27 INFO MAIN :: [918cfe7] 12345: Unable to find the show in the database 2020-05-27 18:16:28 INFO MAIN :: [918cfe7] 353095: Unable to find IMDb info in the database: Torben Chris Rydder Op 2020-05-27 18:16:28 INFO MAIN :: [918cfe7] 380840: Unable to find IMDb info in the database: Savmordet 2020-05-27 18:16:28 INFO MAIN :: [918cfe7] Starting Medusa [master] using '/config/config.ini' 2020-05-27 18:16:28 INFO TORNADO :: [918cfe7] Starting Medusa on http://0.0.0.0:8081/ 2020-05-27 18:16:28 INFO MAIN :: [918cfe7] Updating exception_cache and exception_season_cache 2020-05-27 18:16:28 INFO MAIN :: [918cfe7] Finished processing 3250 scene exceptions. 2020-05-27 18:16:28 INFO MAIN :: [918cfe7] Building internal name cache for all shows It's tempting to blame the 0.0.0.0 address, but it seems like the UI *is* up on the proper address. It just does.. nothing.. except display a loading animation. I tried forcing an update to no avail. Any suggestions? I'd rather not lose my database after all. Update; further inspection, and obvious troubleshooting, resulted in FireFox being to blame in this instance. All is well in Chrome. Huh.

Yeah me too. My piHole is in br0 and has an IP address assigned, and I can access it just fine. NPM just can't, to my knowledge, access the other virtual networks for the remapping. Anyone feel free to correct me, of course.

It has been a while since I set it up, but I think it only functions correctly when used in bridge, otherwise it can't access what it needs. I went through the same issue, I'm pretty sure, actually. Point being; I'm fairly sure it that it needs to be in bridge mode for it to be able to reach the addresses of other systems in bridge mode. Not sure if creating an entirely separate network for nginx and web-facing services would work though.

Why do you want to? You have app.plex.tv for managing it. Failing that, just launch web-interface from the plex docker.

Yes, well, the intent of the docker is to expose it to the internet to some degree, makes sense to me that it's password protected by default. If you haven't actually made any setup, just remove it and re-install. If it persists with the data during this, you can always use Community Application Cleanup App Data to get a fresh start - or just specify a different app-data directory (config directory) during initial setup of the docker. The config directory if you wanna poke around in console is @ /mnt/user/appdata/NginxProxyManager per default, I couldn't find anything to manually define a local user at a cursory glance.

I want something with fairly low power consumption, since it'll be running 24/7. I don't see intel delivering on that any time soon, sadly. And Plex can't utilize AMD as yet, unless I missed the news or something.

William is, indeed, one awesome individual. I have an ASRock Rack Board myself and have also been in contact with him. Extremely perceptive, helpful and I can't imagine what ASRock Rack would be like without him. Personally I'm not sure what to upgrade with. I want to use my current board (C2750D4I) as my backup box, but I am completely stumped on what to replace it with. I really don't want such a demanding CPU, as I don't really have the need for it. I would like to be able to throw up a VM though, so yeah. Guess I just have to keep an eye on ASRock Rack releases.

You're saying that it works outside your network? I had a similar issue with a Linksys router, that had a feature that I of course can't remember what was, that specifically prevented something like nginx working from inside the network. Outside it was fine. Maybe look at your router settings and try turning some stuff off?

It should be in bridge. As should Sonarr, by the way, AFAIK. I have medusa and transmission in bridge mode and all is well in the world.

There's a community application "cleanup appadata" that can ensure you get everything.

Seems your settings are identical to mine. It's probably down to the vpn-specific stuff, then. I'd try removing the docker entirely and re-adding it all other things being equal to what worked for you before. I'm assuming you're sure that your PIA is paid and active of course.

What are your network settings for the docker?

No guarantee either US or UK supports port forwarding. I have success with Israel.

Select another country and try again.

Side note; you had a setting; add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=15768000; includeSubDomains; preload;"; Does that help with the issue of nextcloud timing out during update procedures?

Anyone else experiencing the docker memory leaking itself to death after the latest update? It's suddenly starting at 700ish MB memory and then just growing until it reaches my max-limit. I've just had to change it from a 2GB to 4GB limit just to mitigate a bit. Anyone else noticed this? Update; well it's been a week without killing itself, here's hoping - and a new update came out too. It's running at a stable-ish 1GB memory use.

Depends on router upnp, either way it's ports opened by my reckoning. Edit; opening up to the possibility that I am wrong on this, so if anyone knows better, feel free to correct me. Mine's just running on the local LAN - but since it's BT protocol one assumes that upnp be required. But yeah.

1. You can select the ports, but yes, you need to be able to open ports. Using VPN would void this requirement, although I've not tried setting up a specific docker over a VPN other than one that came with VPN built-in. 2. Log issue is solved by setting log-values for the docker. 3. No. Less overhead on a docker, but it's a web-ui so.. I just realized I could've been more helpful regarding the log-issue; I've set this as extra parameters on the docker; --memory=2G --log-opt max-size=50m --log-opt max-file=1