Jump to content

Datapotomus

Members
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Datapotomus

  1. Ok, so I sort of figured it out. If I turn off bridging on eth1, and eth2 then leave it on, on eth0, then bridge them all together it seems to work correctly. # Generated settings: IFNAME[0]="br0" BRNAME[0]="br0" BRSTP[0]="yes" BRFD[0]="0" BRNICS[0]="eth0 eth1 eth2" PROTOCOL[0]="ipv4" USE_DHCP[0]="no" IPADDR[0]="192.168.1.253" NETMASK[0]="255.255.255.0" GATEWAY[0]="192.168.1.1" DNS_SERVER1="192.168.1.254" DNS_SERVER2="192.168.1.1" DNS_SERVER3="1.1.1.1" USE_DHCP6[0]="yes" DHCP6_KEEPRESOLV="no" SYSNICS="1" If someone has a better way to do this than bridging ports that aren't even plugged in I'm all ears. However, it does look like doing this does seem to persist after reboot.
  2. # Generated settings: IFNAME[0]="br0" BRNAME[0]="br0" BRSTP[0]="no" BRFD[0]="0" BRNICS[0]="eth0" PROTOCOL[0]="ipv4" USE_DHCP[0]="no" IPADDR[0]="192.168.1.253" NETMASK[0]="255.255.255.0" GATEWAY[0]="192.168.1.1" DNS_SERVER1="1.1.1.1" DNS_SERVER2="192.168.1.1" DNS_SERVER3="8.8.8.8" USE_DHCP6[0]="yes" DHCP6_KEEPRESOLV="no" IFNAME[1]="br1" BRNAME[1]="br1" BRNICS[1]="eth1" BRSTP[1]="no" BRFD[1]="0" PROTOCOL[1]="ipv4" USE_DHCP[1]="no" IPADDR[1]="192.168.1.252" NETMASK[1]="255.255.255.0" GATEWAY[1]="192.168.1.1" IFNAME[2]="br2" BRNAME[2]="br2" BRNICS[2]="eth2" BRSTP[2]="no" BRFD[2]="0" PROTOCOL[2]="ipv4" USE_DHCP[2]="no" IPADDR[2]="192.168.1.251" NETMASK[2]="255.255.255.0" GATEWAY[2]="192.168.1.1" SYSNICS="3" Here you go. Like I said, the most baffling thing about it. Is that it worked just fine with the previous version of unraid when I downgraded. As well as naturally working before the upgrade.
  3. Hey All, I've been running into an issue after upgrading to 6.7.2 . Where br2 becomes the default route. The issue with this is that I don't have anything plugged into br2. I am currently only using br0, because it is my 10G link. br1, and br2 are only 1G links. So, I really don't want to use them. I was able to fix this by modifying the route table manually. However, if I modify it manually after a reboot it reverts right back. The weird thing is also if I downgrade back to 6.6.7 I don't have this issue. So, my primary question is what is the best option for making the br0 route persistent across reboots?
  4. I figured the issue out a little later. Posting the solution now. I needed to make a copy of the serverconfig.xml, and named it serverconfig_new.xml. Then I changed it in the docker configuration page GAME_PARAMS to -configfile=serverconfig_new.xml -logfile 7DaysToDie_Data/output_log.txt $@. After that 7DTD worked just fine. Thanks for the work on the container.
  5. 7DTD docker log.txtHey all I'm running into an issue with the 7DTD container. I got it started with no issue.I shut down the container. I make the changes to the serverconfig.xml then start it back up. As soon as I start it back up my changes seemed to get revered back to the default. I did make sure that the files saved, by exiting, and opening it back up, and it does save, but the second I start the container back up it wipes the file. Has anyone else run into this, and figured out a way to not have it wipe?
  6. I guess I would add to the question with are there like a settings.xml or another configuration file you could set up https with? I agree with the VPN comment, because I wouldn't open up my NAS externally. I would still like my NAS to be configured for https. I could see small offices that might also like this functionality.
  7. Limetech is currently working on a container that should be better supported than this one. The main thing I don't like about using a VM, is the additional overhead in resources that using another OS requires.
  8. Are there any plans on you guys putting making crashplan available through the limetech templates? I saw that there is a repo, but it doesn't look like it has been published to the hub yet.
  9. I have submitted a ticket to code 42 requesting that they change the link to a more generic "latest" link. That way if you do attempt to create a new container you should be able to just download the latest version, and not have to do a download then an upgrade. This would still require a change on the source repository. However, the link would only have to be changed one more time in the source repository.
  10. I'm running into an issue after the update as well. I attempted to even clear out my crashplan docker configuration directory, and start with a new container and image. It just now sits on "upgrading" when opening the GUI in windows.
  11. Hey just wondering if this was going to be updated for 4.2 looking at the install. It looks like it is still pulling from 3.7. JAVACOMMON=`which java` # Downloading Crashplan wget -nv http://download.code42.com/installs/linux/install/CrashPlan/CrashPlan_3.7.0_Linux.tgz -O - | tar -zx -C /tmp # Installation directory Wondering if the new link can be added? http://download.code42.com/installs/linux/install/CrashPlan/CrashPlan_4.2.0_Linux.tgz
×
×
  • Create New...