[Test your translations]

On 6/27/2020 at 7:15 AM, bonienl said:

I have expanded the .woff and .ttf format files and included more languages support (including Polish).

Thank You, should I expect the change will take effect in the next beta?

[Test your translations]

On 6/22/2020 at 3:35 PM, bonienl said:

The GUI has 4 different formats installed: eot, svg, ttf and woff

 

It is the browser that decides which format to use, different browsers use different formats.

Yes, i'm aware Still, all these available formats lack multiple language-specific glyphs, including polish. Would You be so kind as to update the files, or direct me towards a person that is responsible for it, please?

[Test your translations]

@bonienl would it be possible to update WOFF fonts to include glyps from other languages than presently available?

In my case i have a mix of clear-sans and times new roman which looks quite ugly

That's just the main navbar, but it;'s the same everywhere.

Apparently according to FontDrop, the Clear Sans version unRaid is using does support only 15 languages, not including polish:

 

Whereas the TTF font available for download here: https://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/clear-sans supports 36 languages including polish.

 

It seems that even if I locally install this TTF version, my browsers (Chrome and Firefox) default to the woff fonts that do not include polish characters

 

[Test your translations]

6 hours ago, Squid said:

You can edit /config/plugins/dynamix/dynamix.cfg  on the flash driveand completely remove the line (and don't leave a blank line in its place)

locale="xx_XX"

and then reload any page on the UI to go back to English.

Thanks!

[Test your translations]

42 minutes ago, Squid said:

Neither Settings - Display - Language or the little switch language icon on the tool bar don't work?

I think the language switch icon, might have been working, but other pages were mostly empty. The problem was caused by wrong format of line ends (CRLF) instead of (LF). Restarting solved that fortunately - unRaid had only English after reboot.

 

Still, out of curiosity - is there any path accessible to the user via ssh, where the config is located?

[Polish language help]

Is there any possibility of defining national date format? I unRaid the default is for example "Thursday, 2019 Aprlil 4". In polish it makes no sense, because we are used to a different format like "Thursday, 4 April 2019" which translates to "Czwartek, 4 kwietnia 2019".

[Test your translations]

Testing first two files after translation. Per instruction i've zipped whole folder, uploaded and switched to Polish. then parts of GUI work ok, but crucially the forms for reverting to english or reuploading the zip file do not work at all.

I know that restarting reverts to english, but how do i change the GUI language back to english via the terminal, to avoid restarting?

[Case icon requests]

On 3/26/2020 at 2:09 PM, Mex said:

 

That is wonderful, already put to good use, thank You!

[Case icon requests]

Good Sir, would it be possible to create an icon for Microserver Gen8?

 

 

[[Support] Linuxserver.io - Duplicati]

6 hours ago, Niklas said:

Since last update, my backups to OneDrive stopped working.

 

Getting this when testing the connection:

"Error

Failed to connect: Only 'http' and 'https' schemes are allowed. Parameter name: requestUri"

 

Same problem here. Temporary solution that I came up with is to edit the docker settings and change repository to an older version: "linuxserver/duplicati:v2.0.4.23-2.0.4.23_beta_2019-07-14-ls27"

 

[Basic questions about terminal after boot]

7 minutes ago, Squid said:

What plugins are installed?

The list is as follows:

 

CA Backup / Restore Appdata
Community Applications
Dynamix SSD TRIM
Dynamix System Information
Dynamix System Statistics
Dynamix System Temperature
File Activity
Fix Common Problems
Nerd Tools
Open Files
OpenVPN Client
OpenVPN Server TUN mode
rclone
Unassigned Devices
unBALANCE
User Scripts
Wake On Lan support

 

Strange thing... does the screenshot look similar to what a curl would output?

[Basic questions about terminal after boot]

Hi there!

 

Noticed some "table" appearing at the very end of boot process, after starting samba daemons in console, what is it, and what are the speeds in the table about if anybody knows?

Also - can I change something in config files to clear the screen after boot, so only login prompt is visible?

 

[User cannot access share, underlying filesystem group unexpectedly set to 2000, permissions all over the place]

On 6/18/2019 at 8:56 PM, itimpi said:

Those look correct!     nobody/users is what the New Permissions script sets.  

OK, so if that does that, then is it normal that afterwards the files get permissions depending on the username that put them there instead of nobody?

[User cannot access share, underlying filesystem group unexpectedly set to 2000, permissions all over the place]

8 minutes ago, itimpi said:

What protocol is the share set to use?

All my shares use only SMB.

Just found out, I can use the "Docker Safe New Permissions", running it now, will report the results. Still the question remains, why so vast differences in the state of folder permissions in the first place.

 

EDIT:

 

Permissions in old folders and files seem to be fixed, but any newly created folder gains again different settings, is that how it's supposed to be? Does not make any sense to me
 

drwxrwxrwx 1 he users          0 Jun 18 19:58 New\ folder/
drwxrwsrwx 1 nobody  users        226 Feb 11 12:54 Old\ Folder/

 

[User cannot access share, underlying filesystem group unexpectedly set to 2000, permissions all over the place]

I have two users set up in unRaid, let's call them "he" and "she"

There is a share called "common" with access set in unRaid as Read/Write to both "he" and "she" users.

There is a folder on that share that "he" can open and write to, but "she" cannot.

When I check via terminal the underlying permissions they are set to:

drwxrwx--- 1 he  2000          0 Jun 18 18:38 Folder/

What is stranger, there are other folders in the same share with totally different permissions:

drwxrws--- 1 he  2000        100 Oct  7  2017 Folder2/
drwxr-xr-x 1 he  2000       4096 Apr 17 08:53 Folder3/
drwxrwxrwx 1 he users       8192 Jun 12 13:24 Folder4/

Why are the permissions so vastly different?

It appears "she" can access only these folders, which have a group set to "users" instead of 2000. How do I safely repair the permissions? Do i simply use chmod, or is there some setting in the GUI?

[add reboot now to "Reboot required to apply Unraid OS update"]

Just do it so You have to click twice in different parts of the screen. So first - "reboot now", and then it expands, requires You to move mouse to the right, and press "confirm". Just in case I doulble-click it by accident.

[(SOLVED) Cannot start array after buying key.]

22 minutes ago, bonienl said:

Not a bug. You told the system to use encryption for that particular disk.

Subsequently it will ask you to enter a passphrase (or file) and will format the disk with encryption enabled.

Remember that everytime you change the file system (with or without encryption) it will require a disk format to start using the newly selected file system.

Be warned: when formatting a disk you will loose all data on it (don't make the mistake to think it can be recovered using parity)

No, I never told unRaid to encrypt that particular disk, as stated in the previous post. I only told the system, that in case I add a new drive, the default filesystem should be xfs-encrypted - at least that is how in the settings this option is explained: "Defines the default file system type to create when an unmountable array device is formatted."

[(SOLVED) Cannot start array after buying key.]

OK, problem Solved, I think it's a bug actually.

If in Settings > Disk Settings > Default file system is set to "xfs-encrypted", (which I probably set during my testing, and never actually encrypted any drives), than You will not be able to start array, even if it consists of only non-encrypted drives.

The question what happens after applying password on Main screen, to enable array Start button is still to be answered.

 

 

[(SOLVED) Cannot start array after buying key.]

Hey, the trial worked great, bought the key (basic - 4 devices), and it prompted  me to stop array to finish installing the key. Did that. Now the button to start array is greyed out and cannot be pressed.

I rebooted the machine, array autostarted correctly. But if i stop it from GUI, I cannot start it due to greyed-out start button. So in effect every array stop, requires a machine reboot to restart the array.

 

EDIT:

 

Interestingly, when the array is stopped, it apparently cannot be started because it prompts me to "Enter new passphrase", as if the drives were encrypted? All of them re plain xfs and btrfs, so why the prompt? Should i put anything as the passphrase and its confirmation, or would it enable the encryption and god forbid format the drives?

[OpenVPN Server & Client for unRAID 6.2+ (6.1 are still supported)]

Is it possible to separate configuration form, to be able to set different port and address for the server to operate on, and different port to be input into user configs? I have my OpenVpn server running on power 1194 internally, but it is visible outside on port 443 using a dynamic dns name. With current config it is impossible to automatically generate working configs for the clients.

[Parity calculation speed]

46 minutes ago, johnnie.black said:

Write cache for parity disk is disabled, you can turn it on with:

 

hdparm -W1 /dev/sdX

  

Might go back to default after a reboot.

 

42 minutes ago, johnnie.black said:

In fact it's disabled for all your disks, very unusual. something is/was disabling it.

 

I guess that was the fastest and finest diagnosis of any problem I had ever. 160MBps now Worked like a charm, appreciate it!

 

Curious about that cache being disabled everywhere, even though in BIOS it's enabled. Will investigate further and update this post if i find the reason. Wonder if maybe DiskSpeed or other benchmarking tool i used, disabled it to get more "pure" results.

[Parity calculation speed]

6 hours ago, trurl said:

What I was getting at is that if you have reconstruct write on, then when you write to a disk in the array, all the other disks should be read.

 

Are you saying reading from a data disk is that slow? Reading a data drive doesn't involve parity, just the drive being read.

Yes, read speed from data disk is the same as write speed to parity disk - around 45-49 MBps.

 

1 hour ago, johnnie.black said:

If you mean parity sync, check in the bios that write cache is enable, if it is and still slow then please post the diagnostics: Tools -> Diagnostics

Not sure if I named it correctly - basically in my array there is one 8TB data drive. I added another identical 8TB new and empty drive to the array as parity disk. I clicked "Parity-sync/data rebuild" to fill parity disk with parity data. Since then the speed of this process is very slow. The caching is enabled in BIOS.

 

Looking through diagnostics I found lsscsi.txt which showed queue_depth of both my 8TB drives as 1, which if i understand correctly means NCQ is disabled. On the other hand in unRaid settings, NCQ is set to be enabled. Could this be the problem?

 

I do attach diagnostics below. 

 

 

[Parity calculation speed]

I am, the data drive has read speed matching the write speed of parity drive. Currently 47,9 MBps. If it helps diagnostically, I'm running 6.7.0-rc7

[Parity calculation speed]

Thanks for the answer. In disk settings, the Tunable(md_write_method), is since 5 minutes after the installation set to "reconstruct write". Is it possible that the disks do not use the setting, or have it reset somehow? Can i verify the method that is actually in use?

[Parity calculation speed]

Hi there!

 

Let me start by saying that i am just trying unRaid for the last few days and like it a lot!

I do have a question about parity calculation though. My HW is HP Microserver gen8 with G1610T CPU, two WD REDs 3 TB, two shucked HGST HE 8TB and 128GB SSD for cache.

 In my PC al HDDs bench slightly below 200MBps, in unRaid while doing parity calculation with only 2x8TB connected (2x3TB are unmounted, and not associated) the speed I am seeing is 40-50MBps. Is this to be expected? CPU load is never greater than 20%, so what is the bottleneck here?