RadTechDad

Would it be possible to add other types of fields, and/or conditionals / logic to the CA templates? Like drop-down menus, or boolean variables? Some basic if/else logic? What I'm thinking is that when you try to install an app, if you say yes/no to one question in the template, then it will enable/disable other fields in the template.

I'm just going to put this here for anyone else. If you look at the written guide on Ibracorp's website (https://docs.ibracorp.io/cloudflare-tunnel/), the first step they say is to create the appdata directory and give it proper permissions first with the following command: mkdir -p /mnt/user/appdata/cloudflared/ && chmod -R 777 /mnt/user/appdata/cloudflared/ Then you can follow the rest of the video.

So I'm a little lost. In the Ibracorp video, when you take a look at his installed docker apps, he didn't already have the dockerized container installed Am I supposed to install it before following the directions on the GitHub page? I tried following without it, but I'm getting the following error: `error writing cert to /home/nonroot/.cloudflared/cert.pem: open /home/nonroot/.cloudflared/cert.pem: permission denied` I know that `/home/nonroot/` doesn't exist in my filesystem, am I supposed to create it? Then I read something on here that if I use the dockerized container, i'm supposed to use some UUID/token in the advanced settings. I saw that, but where do I get that from? Do i have to create a tunnel first through cloudflare's site?

System Buttons used to work for me, but now it doesn't. They're just gone.

Okay, so I upgraded again through the WebUI so as to provide new diagnostic configs. I updated, rebooted, and now everything is working okay. I'm not sure what happened the first time around, but thank you all for your help.

Here's a list of my devices.... looks like I have a few. Not sure which ones are relavent: IOMMU group 0: [8086:1918] 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500 v5/6th Gen Core Processor Host Bridge/DRAM Registers (rev 07) IOMMU group 1: [8086:1901] 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500 v5/6th Gen Core Processor PCIe Controller (x16) (rev 07) IOMMU group 2: [8086:191d] 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation HD Graphics P530 (rev 06) IOMMU group 3: [8086:a12f] 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 100 Series/C230 Series Chipset Family USB 3.0 xHCI Controller (rev 31) [8086:a131] 00:14.2 Signal processing controller: Intel Corporation 100 Series/C230 Series Chipset Family Thermal Subsystem (rev 31) IOMMU group 4: [8086:a13a] 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 100 Series/C230 Series Chipset Family MEI Controller #1 (rev 31) [8086:a13d] 00:16.3 Serial controller: Intel Corporation 100 Series/C230 Series Chipset Family KT Redirection (rev 31) IOMMU group 5: [8086:a102] 00:17.0 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Q170/Q150/B150/H170/H110/Z170/CM236 Chipset SATA Controller [AHCI Mode] (rev 31) IOMMU group 6: [8086:a110] 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 100 Series/C230 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port #1 (rev f1) IOMMU group 7: [8086:a114] 00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 100 Series/C230 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port #5 (rev f1) IOMMU group 8: [8086:a149] 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation C236 Chipset LPC/eSPI Controller (rev 31) [8086:a121] 00:1f.2 Memory controller: Intel Corporation 100 Series/C230 Series Chipset Family Power Management Controller (rev 31) [8086:a170] 00:1f.3 Audio device: Intel Corporation 100 Series/C230 Series Chipset Family HD Audio Controller (rev 31) [8086:a123] 00:1f.4 SMBus: Intel Corporation 100 Series/C230 Series Chipset Family SMBus (rev 31) IOMMU group 9: [8086:15b7] 00:1f.6 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection (2) I219-LM (rev 31) IOMMU group 10: [104c:8240] 02:00.0 PCI bridge: Texas Instruments XIO2001 PCI Express-to-PCI Bridge IOMMU group 11: [1000:0097] 04:00.0 Serial Attached SCSI controller: Broadcom / LSI SAS3008 PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS-3 (rev 02) I've included it now. sal-9000-diagnostics-20210416-1046.zip

@ChatNoir OMG. Thank you so much! However, I'm running into a HUGE issue. With 6.9.2, some of my drives aren't being recognized: So I downgraded back to 6.8.3 and my drives are recognized again: Is this a known issue with 6.9.2? What can I do to resolve this?

I saw that there was an update for Unraid, so I ran it. Because I'm tired I just went into "zone out" mode and I'm not sure what happened. I thought it finished, which is why I think I closed the popup dialog, but again, not sure. After I closed the dialog, Unraid was still saying there was an update and some of the page wasn't rendering correctly. So I stupidly rebooting thinking (again, because I'm tired), oh, this must be like Windows and need to reboot after updating. Well, now it won't start up. I cannot access it via SSH and cannot access it via WebGUi. Did I just screw up my whole server? Since many of the settings are stored on the USB, is there a way that I can just reinstall the newest version and import all my old settings without the loss of data?

So are you saying that it SHOULD be 192.168.8.1? The IP of my original network? Yes, I already setup the static route.

OMG, Thank you!!! This is exactly the same thing that was happening to me and the reason i was about to post! First off, thank you for having the same unraid setup as me (custom domain, using cloudflare, same issue with wireguard). Secondly, I took your suggestion and went with it. I didn’t like having my domain root (domain.com) not being protected by cloudflare’s proxy. So i created a subdomain (vpn.domain.com) for this purpose. So my A record still is protected by Cloudflare, but now my subdomain’s CNAME record isn’t. I know in the end it still points to the same place, but I still feel better having it setup this way. One last question though... From what I read, the Peer DNS Server should point to the router OR to another DNS server. My network uses the 192.168.8.0/24, but WG uses the 10.253.0.0/24. So my server usually has 192.168.8.10, but gets assigned 10.253.0.1 through WG. So when it comes time to fill in the Peer DNS Server, would I put in the router’s IP as 192.168.8.1? Because when I do that, it doesn’t work — I can connect to the VPN, I can access the router at 192.168.8.1, but I cannot access the unraid server at 192.168.8.10 OR at 10.253.0.1. Oh, it DOES show that it’s trying to connect to my unraid server via the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.unraid.net domain. So in the end I’m forced to put in 1.1.1.1 to get it all to work correctly. I would prefer to just put in my router’s IP so that if i ever change the DNS Server, I just change it in one place (my router) as opposed to my router AND the WG settings.

I tried following the tutorial on the blog (https://unraid.net/blog/wireguard-on-unraid). I am able to connect to my VPN, however, I lose my internet connection and cannot connect to the server or any other computer on the lan. Also, I tend to access my unraid dashboard by going to domain.local, but when I'm connected via VPN, how should I connect to my dashboard? Should domain.local still work? Or do I have to connect to it via IP? Am I supposed to use my internal IP address? or the new IP address range that is being assigned via VPN? (I tried both, but nothing is working -- which is why I'm posting about this in the first place). Attached is an image of my settings (domain name replaced). And I have the port forwarded in my router. Can someone help me figure out what's going on? This is my first time trying to use WireGuard. I usually use a commercial VPN solution without issues.

I'm running into the exact same issue. I can connect to my VPN, but no internet connection, nor can i see any of my other computers on the network. Also, I tend to access my unraid dashboard by going to domain.local, but when I'm connected via VPN, how should I connect to my dashboard? Should domain.local still work? Or do I have to connect to it via IP? Am I supposed to use my internal IP address? or the new IP address range that is being assigned via VPN? (I tried both, but nothing is working -- which is why I'm posting about this in the first place).

Thanks, I JUST saw that.

This was working fine for me a few days ago. The only thing I've done was added a SAS controller to my hardware. I updated Krusader and now I'm getting the following message:

I’m new to Unraid and docker, and have very little experience with virtualization. I just want to make sure that I have the concepts correct when it comes to how I want to setup my Unraid server. I would like to create a Development Environment on my server. I just wanted some advice on how to best implement this? Should I start installing the languages and compilers that I need straight into Unraid? Should I download docker-ized versions of the languages and compilers? Should I run a VM to create an “environment” for development? And then maybe run Docker from within the VM? Should I go with Vagrant? I basically want a setup that I can connect to from my iPad or laptop (Macbook Air) or PC (Win 10) and still have access to all the same tools, IDE, compilers, resources, etc. I saw the “binhex pycharm” docker image, but the info doesn’t even say if Python is included and if so, what version?

So in the past, I just had a Synology DS411+II with 4, 2TB (Old Seagate Barracudas) drives in a RAID 5 configuration. I was just going to offload the data from the 2 TB drives onto another computer, then reformat those drives for use in Unraid. However, it seems that the case I have for my server only supports 4 drives and since I have an almost empt 15U rack, I was thinking of getting a rack enclosure. However, it’s been a while since I’ve looked into controller hardware. I’m looking for advice on an HDD rackmount enclosure and/or if I should go SATA or SAS or even mini-SAS. My sata connections on the mobo are full too (just 2), so I’d like to get a controller that also will let me add a couple more drives inside the server tower. [edit] Just found out that something like this exists: Rosewill RSV-L4500 - Server Case or Chassis, 4U Rackmount - 15 x Internal Bays, 8 x Cooling Fans Included Could this be a viable option? And why would someone go for something like this RAID Machine N4424RM 24-bay 12G SAS Expander Rackmount JBOD Enclosure for $2000 when they can just get a server case like above that already supports 15 drives for about $200? Does something like this RAID machine HAVE to run a RAID configuration? Can’t it just be hooked up to an Unraid server and used as a data array? I mean, it even says, JBOD.

This is probably what I'll have to do because I can't afford to buy new drives just for the server. I was hoping to reuse what I already have so I can sell the synology without any drives. The synology works, it's just slow and can't handle everything I want to use it for. I cannot transfer directly from one onto the other because I don't have any spare drives.

I have an older Synology with four 2TB hard drives on there. I'd like to move my data onto my unRaid server that I just got. I have a 1TB SSD that i'll be using for the cache, and a 3TB HDD that i'll be using for parity. Am I able to just take the drives out of the Synology and hook them up to my unRaid server and have unRaid do it's thing?