TDA

Members
  • Posts

    181
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TDA

  1. Hi,

    I've recently UPGRADED to version 18.0.2 and tried to enable ONLYOFFICE.

    I've enabled "Community Document Server" and the "OnlyOffice" App.

    I can create a document but when I try to open it I get:

    "ONLYOFFICE cannot be reached. Please contact admin"

     

    What I'm missing here?

  2. 42 minutes ago, Squid said:

    What I see is that you're trying to reinstall a second instance after searching for "sonarr".  I honestly never tried doing that.  Does it work for you if doing this from the "Installed Apps" section?  That's how the system is actually designed to work.

     

    But, now that I can see what you're trying to do I can fix or disallow that operation unless you're within installed apps ( have to look at the code tonight )

     

    EDIT: Thank God you were trying a rather generic search term.  If you did a search for something that only had one result, then I'd be spending hours again trying to figure out what was happening, only to come back with the original answer of it's impossible ;) 

    Ah well!
    I didn't know there was a designed way to use it - cause as said, it has worked one time (with Collabora and Nextcloud); and I reinstalled it through the search 🙂
    But trying from the installed tab definitely works!
    Thank you for the help!
     

  3. 12 minutes ago, Squid said:

     

    This ^^^

     

    I can't replicate the problem, and as far as I can tell there's no way that CreateXML error should be possible.  The file will tell me if the problem is on CA's end or if its in your browser (ie: some addon like MewCx interfering with the communication)

    Hello,
    I've tried SONARR (linuxserver)

     

    displayed.json

  4. On 2/6/2020 at 8:35 PM, Squid said:

    All my quick tests show that this should work no problems for you.  Anything weird going on I should know about?  Can you install any other docker app?

    Hello,

    Since the reinstall isn't working anymore, is there something I could check/analyse to find a solution?
    I really need the ability to install the same docker multiple times. (i.e: BETA version of a docker, multi instance of BW, ... )

    Cheers

  5. 7 minutes ago, Squid said:

    All my quick tests show that this should work no problems for you.  Anything weird going on I should know about?  Can you install any other docker app?

    I've only problem when I try to reinstall something.

    Bitwarden & Collabora (the two I've tested).

     

    Installing is working just fine.

     

  6. 13 hours ago, Squid said:

    Just so we're clear, is that error showing up when you click the reinstall default icon (ie: showing up within CA), or afterwards after the template shows up?  And, if it's afterwards, is the template screen that pops up populated or empty?

    Hi,

    The error show up as soon as i click the reinstall default icon.

  7. 45 minutes ago, Roxedus said:

    Yes. But the variable gets set, with the value of NULL, which makes the container shutdown. I wont remove it because I feel like its the best way to get started, even though you don't need to do it this way.

    Hmm.. maybe is the best way to get started, but what is with the users who don't want it?
    When not needed, is always better to have an admin access disabled when accessible from the Internet (even if it's a base64 pwd).
    So there is no way to use this container without the ADMIN_TOKEN ?

    46 minutes ago, Roxedus said:

    Depending on how you tried to add the second one, it may have tried to use the template from @cheesemarathon

    I simply tried to add it through the CommunityApp.

  8. 6 hours ago, Roxedus said:

    It's not really. However the container wont run if its blank and marking it as required forces the user to fill it, and I agree with the method SpaceInvader showed in his video to create the user. Using the admin page works independently of allowing signups.

    I know it wont run since is mandatory.
    My question is why? Since the old mpbrasil container didn't need it to start - and neither BW need it (mandatory).

    Isn't possible to modify the template and set the entry NOT_MANDATORY?

    Since isn't really needed for BW itself.

    6 hours ago, Roxedus said:

    Does your original container use the mpbrasil repository?

    I migrated from mprasil to this - maybe I forgot something?

  9. Hello,

    I've two question.

    1) I've already setup an instance of BW, now I was trying to add a second one and I get following error:

    CreateXML: XML file was missing

    2) Why is mandatory to have an ACCESS_TOKEN?
    I mean obviously you need one WHEN you need to access the admin console, but when you don't need it - you could just avoid to have an access_token and an admin page.

     

    Thanks 🙂

  10. Hello Everyone,

    I wanted to know how to reset the routing table (or the whole network settings) back to default.

    About a year ago I played a little with the routing tables - and now I don't know what/why I did some of the settings.

    Since I'm about to configure my new unifiy switch & Opnsense (with vlans&co) I need default settings to be able to connect the extern accessible docker to the correct VLAN.

     

    So... how to reset routing table to default?

     

    Thanks in advice.

  11. Hello everyone,

    Does anyone know if NEXTCLOUD generates certificates automatically ?
    Cause on my NGINX PROXY MANAGER console I see that the cert is expired ... but when I connect to the website the expiration date isn't the same as the one shown in NGINX PROXY MANAGER.

     

    EDIT:
    Iis there plan to implement DNS Authorization (for Wildcards) ?

  12. Hello Everyone,

    Today I wanted to install a Docker Container, so I switched to the APP TAB.

    I saw then this warning:

    Backup Server Active. Some icons may not appear, and plugin installations may be affected

     

    I was wondering... from where does this warning come?

    Cause I wasn't doing any backup (BACKUP/RESTORE Plugin is set to do backups on sunday).

  13. On 1/12/2020 at 4:40 PM, ndaringer said:

    Not 100% sure if this is the best way to do it or not, but here is what I did to migrate to the bitwardenrs docker

     

    !!!!! Stop your existing bitwarden docker and then make a backup of your existing bitwarden appdata folder !!!!!

    I did this using the unraid web terminal as follows:

    • cd /mnt/user/appdata/
    • tar -cvzf bw.tgz /mnt/user/appdata/bitwarden

    Copy that tgz file to at least 3 places. You should see it in the root of your appdata share.

     

    Now that you've backed up your precious bitwarden data, let's do the migration.

     

    Go to CA and open the template to install the bitwardenrs docker

     

    Y8eDv2C.thumb.png.7004032fdf96c76c6af2dea9e8abe1c7.png

     

    1. set the webui port to the same port you had previously used for bitwarden.
    2. make sure the appdata folder matches your old appdata folder
    3. set your server admin email address
    4. lastly, set your admin token with a long random string. I used 'openssl rand -base64 48' to make the string.

    You should be able to hit Apply now and it should create the new docker for you.

     

    Hope this helps.

    Hello,

    Thanks for the answer.

    It worked perfectly.


    My only doubt though, is why on earth is the ADMIN_TOKEN mandatory?
    I don't want the ADMIN CONSOLE to be available all the time - only when needed, like with the "old" version...

    Since the ADMIN CONSOLE doesn't support 2FA; it would be better to be able to disable it when it's not needed.

     

  14. Hello Everyone,

    Today I wanted to install a Docker Container, so I switched to the APP TAB.

    I saw then this warning:

    Backup Server Active. Some icons may not appear, and plugin installations may be affected

     

    I was wondering... from where does this warning come?

    Cause I wasn't doing any backup (BACKUP/RESTORE Plugin is set to do backups on sunday).

  15. 52 minutes ago, trurl said:

    Seems an odd quirk of the BIOS. Unless it was somehow in the boot order I wouldn't think it would care. Was exFAT the format of the disk when it was purchased?

     

    Of course, neither format will work in the array, but it doesn't matter what format it has if you are replacing/rebuilding another array disk since it will be overwritten with the filesystem of the original disk.

    Of course it was EXFAT; also the other 2 8TB were EXFAT and with these I hadn't problem.

    Wathever, now I'm preclearing the disk ;-)

  16. 1 hour ago, trurl said:

    Here is another recent thread that might have some useful information:

     

    https://forums.unraid.net/topic/87075-how-many-drives-on-one-power-cable

     

    Ok a the end I found a solution myself.

    I write it down - cause, you never know - maybe someone could encounter the same behaviour.

     

    So first of all, I've never seen such a behaviour.

    I connected the drive to Window to check if atleast there weren't problem.

    In fact the drive on windows worked perfectly.

    I then runned a couple of tests (W/R, SMART, ... ) and was all fine.

     

    At the end I though ok, last try:

    I formatted the drive from EXFAT to NTFS and I put the disk in the same exact place where it wasn't working (so insted of the 2TB disk).

    It's working perfectly.

     

    So the unconventional solution for such a problem was to FORMAT THE DISK IN NTFS.

  17. 42 minutes ago, trurl said:

    Here is another recent thread that might have some useful information:

     

    https://forums.unraid.net/topic/87075-how-many-drives-on-one-power-cable

     

    I've tried following but without luck:

    Disconnected ALL DISKS and connected only the offending DISK.

    Still same problem.


    I then though ok, maybe the disk has some issue - but connecting the disk to WINDOWS works just fine.

     

    The disk itself cannot be the problem, since I have other 2 disks in my system that are the exact same model and size and it just works fine.